The British Government has privately admitted that Ed Miliband’s wind turbines and solar farms are bad for the environment.
This is the first time that the Labour party have acknowledged that the rush for Net Zero will come at the expense of the environment…...but they are pushing ahead anyway.
Bureaucrats have admitted that the plans may destroy ‘nationally recognized sites, landscapes and historic environments’ as well as damaging ‘biodiversity and water resources’.
The Daily Mail reports: Officials also confess his schemes may increase ‘air emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, noise and vibrations, light pollution, dust and soils.’
They also say these negative effects could ‘occur repeatedly’ and ‘have impacts over the short, medium to long term’, as well as during construction.
The internal dossier, revealed in Freedom of Information requests seen by the Mail on Sunday, raises serious questions about Britain’s food security.
It says their changes will ‘remove some restrictions on green belt land… This could include agricultural land.’
The revelation will infuriate farmers, who are still reeling from Labour’s inheritance tax changes.
It comes as ‘Red Ed’ Miliband rams through mega solar farms across the country, to the fury of residents who live near these enormous projects.
Mr Miliband, the Doncaster North MP, celebrated his 25th ‘large scale’ green energy project last month. Ministers are expecting fierce opposition after they approved 157 more solar farms to be built by 2030.
He has repeatedly deployed draconian planning powers that allow him to overrule local voices when a project is deemed ‘nationally significant’.
Until now, the climate secretary, who is among the favourites to succeed the PM, has been pressing on under the guise of environmentalism.
These findings raise serious questions about how good these projects really are for the environment.
Claire Coutinho, Tory energy spokesman, said: ‘Ed Miliband cannot keep preaching about protecting the environment while covering Britain’s countryside with concrete, pylons and industrial infrastructure.
‘Time and again, he has chosen net zero dogma over common sense — and the public can now see the consequences.’