Site icon The People's Voice

UN Ruling Says ‘Climate Refugees’ Cannot Be Returned Back to Their Home Country

UN rulings says climate refugees cannot be returned to their home countries

It is unlawful for governments to return so-called “climate refugees” back to their home countries, the United Nations has ruled.

The ruling could force the United States to allow Central Americans to enter the country against the wishes of lawmakers.

Thegatewaypundit.com reports: This will essentially open US borders for good.

Now the left has combined open borders with junk science to create climate refugees.

Via The Central Tibetan Administration:

It is unlawful for governments to return people to countries where their lives might be threatened by the climate crisis, a landmark ruling by the United Nations human rights committee has found.

The judgment – which is the first of its kind – represents a legal “tipping point” and a moment that “opens the doorway” to future protection claims for people whose lives and wellbeing have been threatened due to global heating, experts say.

Tens of millions of people are expected to be displaced by global heating in the next decade.

The judgment relates to the case of Ioane Teitiota, a man from the Pacific nation of Kiribati, which is considered one of the countries most threatened by rising sea levels. He applied for protection in New Zealand in 2013, claiming his and his family’s lives were at risk.

The committee heard evidence of overcrowding on the island of South Tarawa, where Teitiota lived, saying that the population there had increased from 1,641 in 1947 to 50,000 in 2010 due to sea level rising leading to other islands becoming uninhabitable, which had led to violence and social tensions.

He also spoke of the lack of fresh water and difficulty growing crops due to salinity of the water table causing serious health issues for his family. He said that as Kiribati was predicted to be uninhabitable in 10 to 15 years, his life was endangered by remaining there.The New Zealand courts rejected Teitiota’s claim for protection.

Exit mobile version