WHO Claims Trans Women’s Milk ‘Just As Good’ For Babies As Breast Milk

The World Health Organization has officially abandoned biology: it now insists that the pharmaceutical concoction squeezed from the chests of men on cross-sex hormones is every bit as nutritious for infants as actual breast milk from the child’s mother.

The BBC, predictably, broadcast this lunacy as if it were a triumphant leap forward for humanity instead of a grotesque betrayal of infants and basic science.

University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust proudly announced they’re following “WHO guidance” and treating male chest-milk as interchangeable with the real thing. Their evidence? One (1) case report where a baby didn’t immediately drop dead, plus the usual domperidone + spironolactone cocktail that forces male bodies to leak fluid. That’s it. That’s the “science.”

The BBC helpfully labeled anyone pointing out that only female mammals lactate as “campaign groups” – because apparently stating basic biology is now hate speech.

Reminder of what actual breast milk contains that no pill-popping male secreting “chest milk” will ever produce:

• Live stem cells
• Species-specific human milk oligosaccharides (over 200 types)
• Maternal antibodies tuned to the baby’s exact environment
• Zero synthetic cross-sex hormones

But sure, keep telling new mothers their baby can thrive on whatever drips out after a man takes enough drugs.

The same WHO that botched COVID, pushed opioids for Big Pharma, and can’t define “woman” anymore has spoken. Case closed.

The BBC didn’t bother asking for long-term data (because there isn’t any). They just parroted the press release and moved on.