November 22nd 1963 remains etched in collective memory as the day President John F. Kennedy was gunned down in Dallas, Texas. The official narrative, peddled by the establishment for decades, points the finger at Lee Harvey Oswald, a lone gunman firing from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository. But what if the real truth has been buried under layers of government cover-ups and media complicity?
In 2017, I penned a bombshell article for UK’s Mail Online, daring to ask the unthinkable: Was Jacqueline Kennedy, the glamorous First Lady, the true assassin of JFK, hired by the CIA to pull the trigger on her own husband?
The official story, as laid out by the Warren Commission, claims Oswald fired two shots, one missing and one fatally striking Kennedy and wounding Governor John Connally in the presidential limousine as it cruised through Dealey Plaza. Yet the facts don’t add up. Independent investigators, including Dr. James Fetzer, author of ‘Murder in Dealey Plaza’, have long cast doubt on Oswald as the sole shooter, suggesting he was either a patsy or not acting alone. More shockingly, some propose that the fatal shot came from close range – potentially from someone inside the car itself. Could that someone have been Jackie Kennedy, the poised figure in the iconic pink suit, sitting mere inches from the President?
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
The motorcade rolled through Dealey Plaza at 12:29pm Central Standard Time, with JFK and Jackie in the back seat, Governor Connally and his wife Nellie in the middle. At 12:30pm, witnesses reported three shots. The Zapruder film, the haunting footage of the assassination, shows Kennedy clutching his chest before a second shot strikes his head, sending fragments of skull flying. Jackie, in a moment seared into history, climbs onto the back of the limousine, reportedly to retrieve a piece of her husband’s skull. But what if this peculiar action was no act of grief but a calculated move to obscure her role in the tragedy?
Justin Bieber Reveals Diddy and Usher Drained His Blood In Sickening Adrenochrome Rituals
Dr. Fetzer argues the fatal shot came from the front, not from behind as the Warren Commission claimed. Over 40 witnesses described a gaping, baseball-sized wound at the back of Kennedy’s head, inconsistent with the autopsy photos showing a small, neat hole at the neck. Fetzer alleges the autopsy X-rays were fabricated to conceal a massive blowout caused by a frontal shot. A close-range shot from within the car would explain the trajectory – and who was closer to JFK than his own wife?
The conspiracy deepens when we consider the CIA’s potential involvement. The agency’s disdain for Kennedy was no secret; his push to dismantle their unchecked power and his refusal to escalate the Cold War made him a target. In my Mail article, I raised the chilling possibility that Jackie, a figure adored by the public, could have been coerced or recruited by the CIA to eliminate her husband. Her behavior post-assassination fuels speculation: she refused to change out of her blood-stained pink suit, insisting, as she told Lady Bird Johnson, “I want them to see what they have done to Jack.” Was this a widow’s defiance or a carefully staged performance to deflect suspicion?
Sceptics might scoff but the evidence is hard to ignore. The Warren Commission’s report is riddled with holes, dismissing testimony that contradicts the lone-gunman theory. The autopsy, conducted under pressure at Bethesda Naval Hospital, was described as “rushed” and incomplete, with the Kennedy family exerting influence to expedite it. Why the hurry? Could it have been to prevent closer scrutiny of the wounds that might implicate a shooter in the car? And then there’s the mysterious bullet found by former Secret Service agent Paul Landis, who claimed in 2023 that he retrieved a bullet from the limousine and placed it on Kennedy’s stretcher – a detail that upends the single-bullet theory and suggests multiple shooters or a cover-up.
Jackie’s actions in the aftermath paint a complex picture. She stood by Lyndon Johnson as he was sworn in aboard Air Force One, still in her bloodied suit, a move some interpret as a signal of loyalty to the new regime. Her later life – marrying Greek tycoon Aristotle Onassis, distancing herself from the Kennedy legacy – only adds to the speculation that she was hiding a dark secret. Was her marriage to Onassis a reward for her silence or, perhaps, a means to escape the prying eyes of a nation obsessed with her tragedy?
The People’s Voice has uncovered no definitive proof that Jackie Kennedy pulled the trigger but the questions raised by my original article demand answers. Why did the Warren Commission ignore witnesses who saw a frontal shot? Why were the autopsy records manipulated? And why has the establishment worked so hard to suppress alternative theories? The idea that Jackie, a global icon, could have been a CIA asset is shocking but not implausible in a world where power and betrayal go hand in hand. As the 62nd anniversary of JFK’s death looms, it’s time to revisit the narrative and demand the truth.
Disclaimer: The above is a speculative piece based on conspiracy theories and does not claim definitive evidence. Readers are encouraged to question all narratives and seek the truth for themselves.
Sources:
- Jacqui Deevoy, “Was Jackie hired by the CIA to kill JFK?” Mail Online, November 22, 2017.
- Additional references on the JFK assassination and Jacqueline Kennedy’s actions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_John_F._Kennedy, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacqueline_Kennedy_Onassis, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-66792977
