A newly declassified U.S. government document has confirmed what alternative media have been reporting for years: the 9/11 attacks were an inside job perpetrated by U.S. government assets.
A court filing from the Guantanamo Military Commission, the court considering the cases of defendants accused of carrying out the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, reveal that the CIA recruited two of the hijackers before they flew planes into the World Trade Center buildings.
Infowars.com reports: The filing was originally published in July 2021 but was heavily redacted. Now a “unexpurgated” copy has been provided by independent researchers, according to RT’s Felix Livshitz.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
The document details DEA veteran Don Canestraro’s investigation of potential Saudi government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, conducted at the request of the defendants’ lawyers.
Canesraro and numerous FBI agents in the investigation appear to conclude that the CIA obstructed official investigations ostensibly to conceal its infiltration of Al Qaeda.
From RT:
Of the great many enduring mysteries of the 9/11 attacks still unresolved over two decades later, perhaps the biggest and gravest relate to the activities of Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar in the 18 months leading up to that fateful day. The pair traveled to the US on multi-entry visas in January 2000, despite having repeatedly been flagged by the CIA and NSA previously as likely Al Qaeda terrorists.
Mere days before their arrival, they attended an Al Qaeda summit in Kuala Lumpur, during which key details of the 9/11 attacks are likely to have been discussed and agreed. The meeting was secretly photographed and videotaped by Malaysian authorities at the direct request of the CIA’s Alec Station, a special unit set up to track Osama bin Laden, although oddly, no audio was captured.
Still, this background should’ve been sufficient to prevent Hazmi and Midhar from entering the US – or at least enough for the FBI to be informed of their presence in the country. As it was, they were admitted for a six-month period at Los Angeles International airport without incident, and Bureau representatives within Alec Station were blocked from sharing this information with their superiors by the CIA.
When a member of the CIA’s Alex Station suggested informing the FBI about the two hijackers obtaining visas to the U.S., he was shut down.
“We’ve got to tell the Bureau about this. These guys clearly are bad. One of them, at least, has a multiple-entry visa to the US. We’ve got to tell the FBI,” Mark Rossini, a member of Alec Station, recalled telling his colleagues. “[But the CIA] said to me, ‘No, it’s not the FBI’s case, not the FBI’s jurisdiction.’”
The FBI agents in the files claimed the CIA also concealed information from the bureau about the two hijackers’ main U.S. contact, Omar al-Bayoumi, who was under FBI investigation.
Additionally, they believe the CIA used Saudi Arabia as a go-between to recruit the two hijackers’ in order to circumvent laws forbidding the Agency from conducting spy operations on U.S. soil.
Though the lead investigator Canestraro doesn’t assert the reason behind the CIA’s decision to withhold information from the FBI that could have prevented the 9/11 attacks, the nature of the CIA’s clandestine Alec Station suggests nefarious motives.
“Canestraro does not make any conclusions as to why the CIA concealed vital information from the FBI prior to the attacks, which potentially could have prevented their execution, and why the Bureau subsequently played along with the Agency’s coverup. Although one answer is provided by the unusual nature of Alec Station’s setup,” Livshitz wrote.
“Namely, that far from infiltrating an Al Qaeda cell to avert terrorism, the Agency was seeking to influence and direct its activities in order to cause terrorism, outside standard recruitment channels. Having stumbled upon such a monstrous connivance, the FBI would’ve known well to leave the entire subject well alone.”
Now that the public is familiar with the intelligence community’s antics to overthrow a sitting U.S. president, the notion the CIA could bear some responsibility for the 9/11 attacks seems within the realm of possibility.
After all, the U.S. government has a storied history of perpetrating false flag operations against the American people.
Sean Adl-Tabatabai
I don’t know if planes were involved or not, but I do know controlled demolition was used for sure in all three towers.
I do know the pilots were not from afghanistan or saudi arabia, they were computer driven or remotely controlled, if planes were actually used
I agree w you that no planes were involved. Aluminium planes couldn’t penetrate the exterior steel framing of the Twin Towers. PDJT & numerous engineers have stated this. And I also saw a video years ago that was filmed by a private citizen & it showed no planes hit the towers. It was controlled demolition.
A tornado can drive a blade of straw into a tree trunk
And your point? No tornado’s were involved. This was a controlled demolition.
10 airplanes hitting the towers would make a mess but could not turn 400,000 cubic yards of concrete into smoke.
Idiot.
And that pentagon plane can’t fly that low to the ground without crashing.
ground effect would be an issue, going that fast.
ground effect is like an air cushion between teh plane’s wings and ground. the faster the plane is going the stronger the ground effect would be. A pilot has to bleed off speed to disapate the ground effect. The video showing the blurr gitting the pentagon indicates it was going fast, there fore had a huge ground effect if it was a B767
That’s right The German courts were authorised to do N independent investigation and they concluded that the suspects named by the west were nit guilty at all and that the story was a load of baloney. Basically Which we all knew from the start Who in their right ever bflievex some tourists just happened to have a little domestic video camera, conveniently pointed in the right place yo capture the footage which by magic was instantly connected to the entire world’s media’s. It took them 6 months to set up live TV coverage of the winter Olympics at the time.
Nukes, used on all 3 buildings.
I did have to do a radiation survey on an xray maching at one of the buildings in the neighborhood a few years after 911. I thought my radiation meter was breaking, it kept pulsating high every once in a while. I walked out and changed the batteries and it seemed to stablize to normal, but would spike every once in awhile. after that I exchanged it for a new one. Not sure if it was the radiation meter or maybe it was the environment.
please, just watch the videos over and over again of the towers falling and see the demolition going on. So obvious.
911 ON 911 spy codes^^^ sent!!! WW call4WAR!!!U DON~T want2know WTF it means!!!!.
Sept 9th, I working for a special security equipment company. we had 5 units there at the Boston American Airlines checkpoint. Boston was my service territory. I took a call from the checkpoint that all five units were down. 5 out of 5. we had an agreement with the FAA that this is not acceptable.
So I got on the delta shuttle the next morning up to Boston. I fixed all 5 units in like 3 hours. they were all silly problems. One was a strange one. someone got into the password menu and changed a calibration Knot. I almost didn’t catch it. So someone with the password got in and made the unit unable to detect any explosives. I scratched my head on that one.
I flew back that afternoon, and on the 10th I flew to the northeast to Livermore labs. and on the morning of the 11th, one of the other engineers called me and told me a plane flew into the towers, I was sitting in the hotel parking lot when he called. then scream, that a second plane hit the other tower.
The point of the this story is that I am wondering if they actually put explosives in the airplane. It was unusual for 5 units to go out. all at the same check point. we had them at all the checkpoints, no problems.
yeah, this story has more holes than the gov report…i don’t believe planes flew into the buildings and like you say, the were demolished by professionals…so where is that in this story?
The smoking gun that it was an inside job was WTC Building No 7. It was not hit by any airplane and was only slightly on fire and yet the 47 story steel building fell onto its own footprint in 9 seconds on the same day. It was a controlled demolition.
A lot of us ‘oldsters’ allready figured this out. Yes, there were ‘planes’ involved, remote controlled, drone/cruse missile guidance attached and loaded with special explosive packages to penetrate . Meanwhile…. the walls and especially the basement, other measures. This was a planned exercise, and used also to test experimental tech. , in summarizing all the information that is available. The CIA had the tech, the Mossad and the Pentagon were in collusion. I don’t expect any of the responsible people to ever be held accountable in my lifetime, but YHWH knows who these are.
proof of the remote controlled missile is the video that showed a british tv crew filming on the nyc street, when they all looked up at something that flew over their heads into the wtc.
typical govt psyops. note they decided to market a “real fbi” stories show. lol lol having those fools describe the false flags as if they were real. they showcase the boston bombing lie.
Why did Brussels get all the opium produced in Afghanistan in the 20 years of the illegal invasion?
Fill them full of paper and aluminum strips
God Bless the flight attendant that told the truth. Our government suppresses technology. It seems that AFTER 911 we came up with drone tech,voice simulators and fake news/narratives.
Wait – were planes used on 9-11? Jet fuel is to blame? How does jet fuel turn steel girders into dust particles?
Well, you know, it is the thing that does that. like CNN says. what is wrong with you?
What’s wrong with me? Well, I’ll have to self-diagnose by watching CNN, CBS, NBC and Doctor Sanjay Gupta
did my sarcasim escape you?
Not at all… I just added some in retort *cheers*
Thank you anonymous for helping to keep my faith in the 911 community. There were no planes. John O Leary made that clear. Doing maneuvers that expert trained pilots couldn’t reproduce multiple times in simulators. So nice to the 1st comment throw water on the plane BS.
If you still believe in planes hitting buildings, a good place to start debunking that theory is to just look at pictures of the cockpit on a jumbo jet. Then ask yourself the question, “Could a person with barely any flight experience who couldn’t fly a single engine Cessna, according to his flight instructor, be able to do maneuvers that veteran pilots are incapable of and pinpoint 2 jets hitting the towers?
CIA Mocking Bird Disinformation here.
Shaped Charge 5th Generation Israeli Nukes buried 150 feet under each WTC tower brought down the buildings.
I do know the buildings were brought down by combat engineers, but someone said they were brought down by nukes buried under the foundation. if that was the case we would have seen the building sink into the ground, instead we saw the floors collapsing at the speed of gravity meaning that there was no resistance from floor to floor. So each floor did not offer any resistance on the way down. how can that happen with no engineered explosions.
No planes in Twin Towers, no plane in Pentagon, no plane in Shanksville & no plane in 7 Tower
Ladies and Gentilmen, please, within a half a day, within rock throw distance from each other, Three buildings very gracefully fell down at the speed of gravity collapsing in their own foot print.
Please go to the mirror and tell yourselves that you were stupid to believe that could happen without demolition explosives.
I know I went to the mirror and admited I was fooled. I should have realized it a few days later. We could have saved our country and went after these people. It would have been easier back then. Now all the people that could help us are gone.
WTC 7 collapse announced by BBC 20 min (or so) before it happened. What more evidence do we need?
Now that is just cwazy tolk. BBC would never lie.
WTC #7 was the building that the Shanksville PA crashed plane was supposed to hit. The Shanksville plane was actually shot down by a low flying military jet which the witnessing residents in Shanksville described as a low-flying small all white jet. There was an 8 mile trail of luggage which NBC news actually broadcast for a couple of days – which demonstrates that the jet was hit by a missile and flew in a disabled condition for a time until crashing into a nearby neighborhood which was not the site the mainstream media had reported. A story was quickly concocted that the Shanksville plane was headed for the White House and Cheney was rushed underground etc etc….which was a successful narrative with the public (but closer scrutiny shows otherwise). The WH narrative was all BS. Since Larry Silverstein had prepared a huge insurance policy on the WTC towers, building #7 had already been pre-wired with C4 charges weeks prior to ensure a complete demolish when the AA airliner hit it. Same with the twin towers – all video evidence confirms explosive charges detonating perfectly in a timed sequence floor by floor to ensure a symmetrical, mostly straight down collapse. The pentagon building was hit by a missile btw, no landing gear forgings or wing structures or fuselage were visible immediately after the event – just a large 15′ diameter hole which went through several rings /layers of that building. CNN’s Jamie McIntyre spilled the bean on live TV and repeated the same information, which he had to quickly retract but we all saw and recorded the initial photos and video.
Another B.S. straw man story to muddy the waters of what really happened on 9/11. The only thing you can be sure of regarding 9/11, is it was a “Inside job” and our government was all in.
Deluded lies spread along with bull dung. The Internet was supposed to make people smarter. What a waste
….no other explanation ever made any sense. If the US government is involved, a false flag is a more than fair assumption.