President Trump is on a winning streak, and his latest victory may be his most unexpected and important yet.
After months of trash talk and behind-the-scenes negotiations, Angela Merkel has had to substantially “water down” her G20 Climate Plan after coming up against the will of President Trump, who refused to cower or submit to the will of the globalists.
This is what American strength looks like. With a strong leader, negotiating with world leaders using the same business savvy that made him a successful businessman, we can ensure that America will be taken care of. Our best interests will be looked after.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
We will not be pushed around on the world stage by globalists any more.
Via Breitbart:
Germany has ‘massively weakened’ its climate action plan for next week’s G20 summit in Hamburg in order to appease Donald Trump.
According to a shocked report in the green, EU-linked propaganda outlet Climate Change News this represents a disastrous cultural surrender which
“….shows the degree to which the German presidency has bent to the will of the Trump White House.”
In public, Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel has been talking tough on climate change, promising to put it at the forefront of the G20 summit and making none-too-subtle swipes at any world leaders out there who happen to dissent from her position.
Without naming him, Merkel appeared to lament U.S. President Donald Trump’s uncertainty about human-induced climate change, saying, “We can’t, and we won’t, wait until the last person on Earth is convinced of the scientific evidence for climate change.”
Behind the scenes, however, it would appear that Merkel’s negotiating teams have been bending over backwards to tone down the climate action plan and avoid an embarrassing rejection by Donald Trump.
This can be seen by comparing the two draft climate action plans for the summit, one from March and the revised one from May. According to Climate Change News, American negotiators have watered it down considerably.
“The US massively weakened the language in the energy part of the action plan,” one source with knowledge of the negotiations said. “It pushed for references to so-called ‘clean’ fossil fuels and made it less explicit that the energy transition has to be built on energy efficiency and renewables.”
“It also provided cover to some other G20 members – such as the Saudis and Russia – to weaken some climate sections of the document, including the pledge to phase out fossil fuel subsidies.”
Here are some of the elements which have been removed from the original draft:
- A 2025 deadline for the end of fossil fuel subsidies
- References to the risk of “stranded assets”
- A call for “the alignment of public expenditure and infrastructure planning with the goals of the
- Paris Agreement”
- A push for carbon pricing
- A commitment to publish mid-century decarbonisation blueprints by next year
- A pledge to develop a “profound” climate plan for multilateral development banks
- Seven references to the UN’s 2018 review of nationally-determined contributions
- 11 references to the 2050 mid-century pathway for net zero emission
- 16 mentions of infrastructure decarbonisation
In other words, this represents the most massive victory for climate rationalism and energy realism – and a crushing and humiliating defeat for the globalists.
Baxter Dmitry
Email: baxter@thepeoplesvoice.tv
As far as I am concerned the USA needs to stay out of the phony Paris Accord, let those Global elitist fall flat on their faces with their phony list of to do and don’t do. We need to stop funding the corrupt world of the UN and Europe.
I have seen many videos that present convincing evidence and common sense that global warming is far more of a natural event than a man made one. I have yet to see as compelling a pro-warming video that has not skewed the science and lied or distorted facts to make points and not been outed for it. I see little convincing argument from pro-warming scientists.
Not to say we have made no effect on the environment but the minuscule % of “cure” they are projecting for the trillion$ they will “take” to do so, indicates to me the minuscule % of impact we have caused and they are able to correct of the so-called “man made” disaster.
They have also demonized co2 in the process… and distorted common sense science wanting to reduce co2 when it is what plants thrive on in the natural process of making clean oxygen for the same silly useless eaters/breathers who condemn co2 as a destructive and dangerous substance on our planet…
So if we reduce co2 we kill the trees. And if we kill the trees there won’t be enough oxygen produced to keep the humans alive. So let’s see. Who do we put on the ‘must die’ list? I say all those that believe this garbage be the first to go.
HOAX HOAX HOAX Are these fools watching the weather??