Not Guilty: Cop Who Jumped on Hood of Car And Murdered Unarmed Couple

Fact checked
Not Guilty: Cop Who Jumped on Hood of Car And Murdered Unarmed Couple

Michael Brelo, the Cleveland officer who jumped on the hood of a car and shot an unarmed couple, was found not guilty on all counts Saturday morning for the shooting and subsequent deaths of Timothy Russell and Malissa Williams.

The verdict follows recent information which showed that the cops knew the couple was unarmed..

As the Free Thought Project reported in February,

In the hours following the shooting, Patrolman James Hummel sent texts in which he said “they all knew” neither of the victims had a gun – that the officers had mistaken a silver can of soda pop for a weapon, prosecutors said.

The texts said that what some of the officers had suspected were gunshots were actually backfires from the fleeing car, that Brelo “was going to be in trouble,” and that “everyone knew Brelo did something wrong,” prosecutors said.

The judge ruled that Brelo jumping on the hood of the car and dumping his magazine into an unarmed couple was “constitutionally justifiable” because it “wasn’t clear that any perceived threat to the officers was over.”

According to CNN,

Emotions ran high outside the courtroom in Cleveland — where public outrage over several recent police shootings has been palpable — after the verdict was read. One woman wept inconsolably on its steps.

Some held up signs, outraged that Brelo was not convicted.

“All I know is that I don’t trust police no more. No police. None,” proclaimed one man, adding that “I can’t recover from this. …This verdict isn’t real. This verdict is fake.

 

2 Comments

  1. And what was it that the officer had stopped them for anyway, and why did he feel it necessary to draw his gun on them? were they actually posing a threat or what. Seems government appointed thugs get away with blatant murder. The cop should have his firearms license removed and be demoted or retired from the police force, as he cannot seem to make a rational well calculated decision before endlessly firing at unarmed people and thinks hes done a good job. Serve and Protect!

  2. And what was it that the officer had stopped them for anyway, and why did he feel it necessary to draw his gun on them? were they actually posing a threat or what. Seems government appointed thugs get away with blatant murder. The cop should have his firearms license removed and be demoted or retired from the police force, as he cannot seem to make a rational well calculated decision before endlessly firing at unarmed people and thinks hes done a good job. Serve and Protect!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.