Caitlin Clark — the face of the WNBA and the white hope of a league desperate for ratings — has officially been branded a “danger” to Black and queer women across America.
Her crime? Not a dirty play, not a racist tweet, not a hateful word — but simply opening her mouth for the first time to complain about the beatings she takes night after night on the hardwood.
And for that unforgivable sin, USA Today’s resident race-baiter Nancy Armour has declared the 22-year-old superstar an enabler of lynch mobs, a tool of white nationalists, and a threat to the very teammates and opponents who have been body-slamming her into the stanchions all season.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
In a jaw-dropping July 23 column, the self-proclaimed moral authority of the WNBA press box didn’t just criticize the Indiana Fever superstar — she effectively branded her a public enemy. Armour’s unhinged rant alleges that Clark, by simply opening her mouth about the relentless physical beatings she endures on the court, is now a “danger” to the league’s Black and queer players.
Justin Bieber Releases PROOF Madonna 'Shapeshifted Into a Reptilian' on Live TV
Yes, you read that right.
According to Armour, the very same Clark who has been shoved, elbowed, punched, and scratched game after game — often by the very “Black and queer” opponents Armour herself name-checks — is somehow the real villain. The abuse, it seems, is perfectly acceptable as long as it’s delivered by the “right” demographic. But the moment Clark dares to speak up? That’s where Armour draws the line — and draws it in blood.
But Armour didn’t stop at bad-faith criticism. She is gaslighting the nation.
In her column, the columnist flatly declares that Clark isn’t actually being abused at all. Those nasty shoves to the floor? The scratches across her face? The hard fouls that would earn any male player a flagrant ejection? All fiction, Armour insists. It’s just Clark’s “habit of flopping,” she writes — a theatrical performance designed to fool referees and fans alike.
And then came the truly unhinged leap.
Armour warns with grave solemnity that Clark’s so-called “flops” are now giving cover to “white nationalists” to commit lynchings against Black Americans.
“But just as Clark’s flops don’t occur behind closed doors, they don’t occur in a vacuum either,”Armour intoned, as if delivering a prophecy from on high.
She continued: “It seems there is a white nationalist element to Clark’s fandom that is deeply, deeply problematic, made even more so because the WNBA is made up predominantly of Black women, many of them queer.”
The accusation is as vile as it is baseless.
Armour then painted Clark as a knowing provocateur, claiming that when the rookie star complains to referees — using “profanity-laced tirades,” no less — those imaginary racists in the stands see “a white woman in need of saving” and allegedly “take matters into their own hands.”
To hammer home her point, Armour invoked the ghost of Emmett Till — because nothing says “sports column” like comparing a basketball argument to one of the most horrific hate crimes in American history.
“The WNBA’s All-Star Game this weekend is in Chicago, Emmett Till’s hometown,” Armour sneered, adding that an art gallery exhibit on Till’s life “if he hadn’t been lynched” somehow makes Clark complicit in racial violence.
But Armour conveniently forgot to mention a few inconvenient facts.
Like the Tuskegee University Archives’ estimate that nearly 1,300 white Americans were also lynched during the Jim Crow era. Or the CDC’s own data showing that more than 8,000 Black Americans are murdered every single year — not over 75 years, but annually — in America’s Democrat-run inner cities. Funny how that never makes it into Armour’s history lessons.
And here’s the kicker: Not a single report exists of any white nationalist — or anyone else — committing violence or crime using Caitlin Clark as an excuse. Not one. The entire narrative is a fiction cooked up in Armour’s fevered imagination, served hot to a credulous press corps.
Clark is a basketball player, not a political pawn. She’s a young woman getting beaten up on the court and daring to ask for fairness. For that, she’s been branded an enabler of lynch mobs by a columnist who desperately needs to step away from the keyboard and crack open a real history book.
The only danger in the WNBA right now is the race-baiting media vultures like Nancy Armour — who are far more interested in stoking division than reporting the truth.
