False Flag Terror Attack In France Sees Harsh Military Rules Imposed

Fact checked

The terror attack in Nice was a government orchestrated false flag operation designed to thwart the snowballing citizen uprising, and allow the authorities to impose harsh military measures across the country.

The terror attack in Nice was a government orchestrated false flag operation designed to thwart the snowballing citizen uprising, and allow the authorities to impose harsh military measures across the country.

The terror attack in Nice, France could not have come at a more auspicious time for the deeply unpopular President Hollande and his embattled government, leading many to believe this was a false flag government orchestrated attack.  The government and authorities have been struggling to control a citizen uprising for the past three months and now they can impose more state of emergency measures, call up military operational reserves, and justify clamping down on any dissidents to thwart the uprising movement.

Not long before the attack happened, French President Hollande said the national state of emergency was to be lifted, so it seems like a strange coincidence for an event to appear right away – on Bastille Day, the country’s national day celebrating the French Revolution in 1789 – allowing the state of emergency to be immediately reinstated, the current revolution to be thwarted, and the New World Order’s march to an authoritarian one world government to continue unimpeded.

Why is France getting attacked? It all started after France said they were going to recognize Palestine as a state, then they started getting odd ‘terror’ events which are used to demonize Muslims. The same happened with Belgium after they started moving in the same direction. Norway also had a mass killing after they sided with Palestine. A a pro-Palestine and anti-Israel political youth organization was attacked, leaving 77 dead.

In October 2014, France’s foreign minister said France would recognise a Palestinian state even if peace talks with Israel fails.

In November 2015 we had the Paris attacks.

In Belgium the parties of the new centre right government agreed to recognise Palestine as a state. The Chamber of Representatives adopted a resolution in favour of this motion in 2015.

Then we had the 2016 Brussels bombings.

Norway upgraded the Palestinian mission in Oslo to an embassy in December 2010, and Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre called for the creation of a Palestinian state within a year.

Then we had the 2011 Norway attacks.

The attacks in Norway were on the largest political youth organization, Workers’ Youth League, who were calling for a boycott of Israel in response to their crimes against humanity in Gaza. Many anti-Israel politicians of the future were killed off that day.

The most obvious suspect with the most to gain from such events is the CIA/Mossad. If it is them, they are trying to turn public opinion against Muslims, so there will be less pressure on the French government to help Palestine, and the New World Order can retain control.

While the mainstream media colludes with the authorities and suppreses news of the massive citizen uprising in France – the largest protests in the country since the French Revolution – they will give the false flag terror event blanket coverage for the next two weeks because this suits the purposes of their masters, the New World Order.

The people of France have been bravely rising up against their elitist ruling class for the last three months, then on Bastille Day, the day the French celebrate their ancestors rising up and overthrowing the elites, the current New World Order aligned government performed an inside job designed to save their skins and thwart the new French Revolution.

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Email: baxter@thepeoplesvoice.tv
Baxter Dmitry

24 Comments

  1. Excellent analysis, Monsieur Baxter!
    Proof of hoax…see the photo of big white truck after supposedly
    running over 100+ people. It’s PRISTINE! Where’s the gore?

    The monsters operating Global Deep State will be the death of humanity and planet earth.

  2. Excellent analysis, Monsieur Baxter!
    Proof of hoax…see the photo of big white truck after supposedly
    running over 100+ people. It’s PRISTINE! Where’s the gore?

    The monsters operating Global Deep State will be the death of humanity and planet earth.

  3. …you’re being sarcastic in this ‘joke’ short article..? I can’t believe that anyone could be so thick and unimaginative to seriously believe that there’s any truth to your claims; unless, of course, they suffered from an undiagnosed psychosis or a paranoid delusional personality disorder.
    If you don’t believe that either of these two categories apply to you, consider the logical basis of these claims; not just the supporting evidence, but the logical framework of your argument for the existence of a massive worldwide conspiracy. Do you understand the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning? If you don’t, educate yourself by reading Karl Popper.
    The problem with your inductive reasoning is that it’s all based on inference to the extent that you create an infallible argument much like the arguments used to prove the existence of God. For example, any proof against the existence of a God is turned on its head and held up as proof of gods existence. Likewise any evidence or proof I could find to demonstrate that your conspiracy theory isn’t true, will be used to demonstrate the cleverness, influence and universal power of the devious, shadowy people and organisations who run the world. The organisations you claim manipulate politics and financial markets to deliver their aims will be by definition able to twist the truth and create whatever proofs needed to establish the ‘truth’ and destroy the credibility of anything contrary.
    So there’s absolutely no point at all arguing with someone like you who relies on inference and circular argument.

    • Then why did you spend all that time typing out an argument, that pretty much all came down to the point that there was no point in you doing exactly what you were doing, while still doing it?

      And there really is quite a lot of reasons and past precedent supporting his theory. Netanyahu made a public statement saying France would be attacked right after France sided against Israel, preceding the attacks, and then lo and behold, and Muslim group suddenly attacks a country that just sided with them on a very important issue? And this is a vote where… ugh, I want to South Africa but I’d have to google to be sure, and I really just don’t feel like being an asshole who googles half the information in their online comment. If not South Africa, definitely some other country, (and you’re welcome to google to confirm this) changes their vote for Palestine after a last minute phone call from Israel. All that is well documented by major news organisations. Why would you think it unreasonable or pointless to consider what you know, consider that past governments have been proven or admitted to carrying out false flag attacks in recent years, consider obvious motives and then theorise based on fairly established facts? And a false flag attack doesn’t mean no one was really killed. People can be coerced into carrying out attacks, and governments certainly can and have lied about the identity of attackers. Remember the 3 people who were reported by the media as being definitely responsible for Charlie Hebdo? The one that wasn’t killed was the kid with the rock solid alibi of being in school.

      And it is still just a theory. Not really comparable to a religious extremist attempting to prove conclusively god exists. I understand you’re all for pointlessness, but I’m not, so incase you’ve missed this, the point of my comment has really been simply to say stop being silly.

        • I don’t know what your point is? And as a kiwi I kind of feel obliged to point out before 2014 France committed its own government endorsed terrorist attacks on countries that also weren’t bombing it or that had colonized it. So I don’t know. How off topic do you feel like going?

  4. …you’re being sarcastic in this ‘joke’ short article..? I can’t believe that anyone could be so thick and unimaginative to seriously believe that there’s any truth to your claims; unless, of course, they suffered from an undiagnosed psychosis or a paranoid delusional personality disorder.
    If you don’t believe that either of these two categories apply to you, consider the logical basis of these claims; not just the supporting evidence, but the logical framework of your argument for the existence of a massive worldwide conspiracy. Do you understand the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning? If you don’t, educate yourself by reading Karl Popper.
    The problem with your inductive reasoning is that it’s all based on inference to the extent that you create an infallible argument much like the arguments used to prove the existence of God. For example, any proof against the existence of a God is turned on its head and held up as proof of gods existence. Likewise any evidence or proof I could find to demonstrate that your conspiracy theory isn’t true, will be used to demonstrate the cleverness, influence and universal power of the devious, shadowy people and organisations who run the world. The organisations you claim manipulate politics and financial markets to deliver their aims will be by definition able to twist the truth and create whatever proofs needed to establish the ‘truth’ and destroy the credibility of anything contrary.
    So there’s absolutely no point at all arguing with someone like you who relies on inference and circular argument.

    • Then why did you spend all that time typing out an argument, that pretty much all came down to the point that there was no point in you doing exactly what you were doing, while still doing it?

      And there really is quite a lot of reasons and past precedent supporting his theory. Netanyahu made a public statement saying France would be attacked right after France sided against Israel, preceding the attacks, and then lo and behold, and Muslim group suddenly attacks a country that just sided with them on a very important issue? And this is a vote where… ugh, I want to South Africa but I’d have to google to be sure, and I really just don’t feel like being an asshole who googles half the information in their online comment. If not South Africa, definitely some other country, (and you’re welcome to google to confirm this) changes their vote for Palestine after a last minute phone call from Israel. All that is well documented by major news organisations. Why would you think it unreasonable or pointless to consider what you know, consider that past governments have been proven or admitted to carrying out false flag attacks in recent years, consider obvious motives and then theorise based on fairly established facts? And a false flag attack doesn’t mean no one was really killed. People can be coerced into carrying out attacks, and governments certainly can and have lied about the identity of attackers. Remember the 3 people who were reported by the media as being definitely responsible for Charlie Hebdo? The one that wasn’t killed was the kid with the rock solid alibi of being in school.

      And it is still just a theory. Not really comparable to a religious extremist attempting to prove conclusively god exists. I understand you’re all for pointlessness, but I’m not, so incase you’ve missed this, the point of my comment has really been simply to say stop being silly.

    • I don’t know what your point is? And as a kiwi I kind of feel obliged to point out before 2014 France committed its own government endorsed terrorist attacks on countries that also weren’t bombing it or that had colonized it. So I don’t know. How off topic do you feel like going?

  5. This is entirely reasonable speculation, and I can’t say I didn’t think exactly the same thing they day Netanyahu threatened France after their decision to vote for Palestine. But I’m a bit uncomfortable about the New World Order angle, and not just because that requires too many stabs in the dark. If the NWO is responsible, don’t we have to take a bit of the blame too? If the world’s elite are the ones directing these events, where does their power to do so come from? Ultimately, money, is my best guess, especially when that money is used to corrupt world governments. And when supposed members of the NWO are the CEOs of companies we all buy from, aren’t we the ones empowering them in the first place, because we’re so damn fucking entitled? Who gives a shit if our recently acquired habits and tastes fuck up the environment, employ child labour, cause resource wars, and result in landfills that will be around long after we’re gone? Enough of us ignore over population and do what the fuck we like in regard to our family sizes. Maybe, if we really want to look at the bigger picture sensibly, we probably need to accept we deserve whatever’s coming and if we’re going to spend our energies on anything, it should be working on ourselves and our own lifestyles so we’re not part of the problem, and not handing over money and power to the people we’d prop up as the big bad guys?

  6. This is entirely reasonable speculation, and I can’t say I didn’t think exactly the same thing they day Netanyahu threatened France after their decision to vote for Palestine. But I’m a bit uncomfortable about the New World Order angle, and not just because that requires too many stabs in the dark. If the NWO is responsible, don’t we have to take a bit of the blame too? If the world’s elite are the ones directing these events, where does their power to do so come from? Ultimately, money, is my best guess, especially when that money is used to corrupt world governments. And when supposed members of the NWO are the CEOs of companies we all buy from, aren’t we the ones empowering them in the first place, because we’re so damn fucking entitled? Who gives a shit if our recently acquired habits and tastes fuck up the environment, employ child labour, cause resource wars, and result in landfills that will be around long after we’re gone? Enough of us ignore over population and do what the fuck we like in regard to our family sizes. Maybe, if we really want to look at the bigger picture sensibly, we probably need to accept we deserve whatever’s coming and if we’re going to spend our energies on anything, it should be working on ourselves and our own lifestyles so we’re not part of the problem, and not handing over money and power to the people we’d prop up as the big bad guys?

  7. Excellent article.. and spot on with what’s going on.

    Note, when hasbara-trolls appear in the comment section and start waffling, then you know for sure they’re worried the truth is getting out.

  8. Excellent article.. and spot on with what’s going on.

    Note, when hasbara-trolls appear in the comment section and start waffling, then you know for sure they’re worried the truth is getting out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.