Flock Safety Executives Are Using Surveillance Cameras to Stalk Underage Girls—Logs Prove It

Internal logs confirm it: a Flock Safety VP tapped into the Dunwoody camera network, scrolled past more than 400 other cameras covering parking lots, intersections, and storefronts—and instead zeroed in on a single feed: a kids’ gymnastics class.

He watched the entire session and logged out. No suspect. No emergency. Just underage girls in leotards doing the splits. He didn’t check a single other camera in the entire municipal grid.

The only question now is whether this was voyeurism, a dry run for something darker, or proof that the surveillance state was always designed to serve the elites—not protect the public.

A Pattern of Abuse or an Innocent Glitch?

While Flock Safety markets its network of automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and fixed cameras as tools for solving violent crime, this incident suggests a far more troubling application. The ability for corporate executives to remotely access municipal camera networks, ostensibly for “testing” or “maintenance,” represents a terrifying loophole in the public’s expectation of privacy.

If a corporate officer can log in to monitor a children’s sports class on a whim, what is to stop them from tracking political dissidents, domestic partners, or other vulnerable populations?

The Flaw in the System

This incident highlights the fundamental failure of “optics” in public safety technology. The infrastructure is often sold to cities with promises of strict “chain of custody” controls. Yet, as this event demonstrates, the chain is only as strong as the individuals holding it. When those individuals have the authority to browse feeds without oversight, the system becomes a private panopticon.

Residents of Dunwoody are left wondering: How long has this been happening? Is this an isolated incident, or is this standard operating procedure for tech executives granted “god mode” access?

Calls for an immediate third-party audit of the Dunwoody Flock system are growing louder, as the community grapples with the realization that the cameras meant to catch criminals may also be used to watch their children.

The Official Response

Flock Safety has yet to issue a full statement regarding the executive’s specific login activity, though sources suggest the company may attempt to dismiss this as a “routine diagnostic check.”

However, for a community already skeptical of mass surveillance, this explanation feels insufficient. The public is demanding to know the specific cause for the login and why the “diagnostic” was isolated to a gymnastics class rather than a more general system test.