Mainstream Media Silent Over Starmer Rent Boys Trial

The UK’s mainstream media is remaining silent about the start of a trial involving three Ukrainian men accused of carrying out arson attacks on property linked to Sir Keir Starmer.

The defendants, Roman Lavrynovych, 21, Petro Pochynok, 34, and Stanislav Carpiuc, 26—appeared at the Central Criminal Court in London, where proceedings have now begun.

All three just happen to be ‘rent boys’, which is British slang for for male prostitutes,

The three face serious charges arising from three coordinated incidents over five days last year. A car was set alight in Kentish Town on 8 May. Three days later, a fire was started at the front door of a converted flat in Islington. Then In the early hours of 12 May, another fire at a property in the same Kentish Town street where Keir Starmer had lived before he moved into Downing Street.

All three have entered not guilty pleas, and a jury has been sworn in. Despite the case getting underway, it has received little to no coverage from major news outlets and broadcasters.

Looks like the establishment is trying to hide something…in fact the silence from the press tells us everything we need to know.

The Canary reports: The court has not imposed any special reporting restrictions beyond the usual that apply to any criminal case. There is no ‘DSMA‘ (formerly D-notice) Government restriction on reporting that the Canary is aware of. Even if there were, it would not be binding and amounts to no more than a Government request – one that is supposed to be listed on the DSMA website. Yet no ‘MSM’ are touching it, at least yet.

Lavrynovych faces three separate charges of arson with intent to endanger life. Pochynok and Carpiuc face one count each of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life. All targeted Starmer.

Yet the media have hardly mentioned the case and have asked none of the obvious questions. Why would the three target Starmer? Why are they all Ukrainian? Is there an intelligence connection? Is there a connection to UK involvement in the Ukraine-Russia war? Why are most of the ‘MSM’ refusing to touch the case?

What’s important to note is the context for the case. The CPS has not charged the three under counter-terror laws – therefore, indicating that the alleged crimes were not over Starmer’s politics, or that of the Government, but of a personal nature to the PM or his family.

Overall, objection that the silence is respecting the presumption of innocence or protecting the right to a fair trial falls down in an instant. All that is needed to show that nonsense up is a glance at the headlines regarding trials and the extent of press attendance at the trials to provide hour-by-hour coverage for the curious.

Trials that don’t involve those protected by the state, at least – or in Starmer’s case, more likely the deep state. Starmer has been described as the “long-time servant of the British security state” and with good reason.