Texas Supreme Court Prohibits School District From Mandating Covid Jabs

Fact checked
Texas governor

Following Thurdsay’s intervention by the Texas Supreme Court, employees of the San Antonio Independent School District are not required to receive the Covid-19 vaccine as a condition of employment.

The Supreme Court sided with Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton and halted the vaccine mandate for the San Antonio school district employees on Thursday, hours before it was set to take effect.

Employees can no longer be fired for not getting the jab , and if anyone is fired, the Texas Attorney General’s office says they should call the office and let the AG’s staff know.

Just The News reports: The Texas Supreme Court issued a temporary stay, halting enforcement of San Antonio ISD’s mandate requiring that all employees receive both COVID-19 doses by Friday (Oct. 15).

“No local entity is above state law,” Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement. “I am glad to see that the Supreme Court of Texas has again confirmed that the Governor’s decisions control at both the state and local levels. This decision should serve as a reminder to all Texas school districts that they should be using their limited funds on educating children and equipping teachers, not defending unlawful vaccine mandates.”

The court said it granted relief while it considered the state’s petition for writ of mandamus. It also said it expressed no view on the merits of the state’s claims.

The vaccine mandate lawsuits as well as lawsuits related to the mandating of mask wearing challenge the legality of Gov. Greg Abbott’s executive orders, which use the Texas Disaster Act as a justification for issuing them.

Several lawsuits last year filed against the governor asked the court to address the 1975-era law, arguing that the executive orders fell outside the scope of the law. The law has never been challenged in its history.

The court also said it has “not yet had the opportunity to consider the merits of these challenges. Our role has been to issue orders preserving the status quo. In the case of local governmental entities seeking to impose new mask mandates, we stayed temporary-relief orders permitting those mandates.”

The state sued SAISD, and the district court ruled in favor of SAISD. The state appealed, and because the Oct. 15 deadline was fast approaching, the state appealed to the Supreme Court to intervene. The court’s ruling essentially put the mandate on hold until the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has the opportunity to hear the case.

During a school board meeting Tuesday, SAISD officials said that nearly 80% of its employees had either submitted a request for exemption or proof that they received both COVID-19 shots.