UK Blocks Russia's UN Security Council Statement On Skripal Poisoning Probe

X Facebook LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram

Why would the UK block Russia’s UN Security Council statement calling for an “urgent and civilized” investigation into the poisoning of former double agent Sergei Skripal in Salisbury?

The proposed draft, unlike previous UK and US statements, did not assign blame for the incident, but instead urged “all member states concerned to consult and cooperate” in the investigation as prescribed by the Chemical Weapons Convention.

BYPASS THE CENSORS

You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

According to Russian UN mission spokesman Fedor Strzhizhovskiy the UK wanted to amend the document in a way that would have distorted its initial meaning.

JOIN THE MEDIA REVOLUTION - CLAIM YOUR STAKE IN ALTERNATIVE MEDIA!

Earlier in the day, Russia’s UN envoy called the UK’s allegations that Moscow was responsible “completely unacceptable” and demanded to see material proof of the accusations.

RT reports: Moscow previously rejected a 36-hour ultimatum from UK Prime Minister Theresa May to explain how what she says is a Soviet-engineered nerve agent called Novichok was brought into the UK to poison former double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter.

At the emergency UNSC meeting on Wednesday, the UK blamed Russia for “unlawful use of force” in the “attempted murder” of Skripal. The accusations were promptly backed by the US, which also pointed the finger at Russia while praising the UK response that included the expulsion of 23 Russian diplomats.

Speaking at the UNSC, Russia’s UN representative Vassily Nebenzia noted that Moscow has nothing to gain from the death of the long-retired former spy, who has kept a low profile since he settled in the UK in 2010. He also cast doubt on the assertion from the British laboratory that the gas used was actually Novichok. Referring to the very short time frame that the UK scientists managed to come to such a definitive conclusion, Nebenzia suggested the UK must have samples and formula of its own.