Bill Gates Urged The US To Reject Govt Regulators Over Covid In Favor Of Big Pharma Vaccine Developers

Fact checked
Bill Gates

A year ago Bill Gates urged Americans to reject government regulators and embrace private-sector vaccine developers instead.

The billionaire philanthropist, who just so happens to fund and profit from those big pharma companies, said he doubted that the FDA & CDC could be trusted on Covid & vaccines..

One year on and we see both the US and the UK governments have been ignoring the advice of their own health officials and regulators.

In the UK, the governments own vaccine advisers, the Joint Committee on Vacination and Immunisation (JCVI) said last month that it had decided NOT to recommend Covid vaccinations for healthy 12 -15 year old children.

Following significant political and media pressure to approve the jab, Chris Whitty and other chief Medical Officers, went ahead regardless and authorised the use of Covid vaccinations for British teens. Whitty justified the decision on the grounds that there were other benefits such as reducing the disruption to the school term.

Likewise in the US top health officials have urged the White House to delay plans to administer Covid vaccine boosters to millions of Americans. They pointed to insufficient data. In fact , two top FDA executives involved in vaccine research abruptly resigned in September amid a reported power struggle with the White House over the booster jabs. 

In an Op-ed for RT Helen Buyniski reports: Like much of the advice Gates has spouted during the Covid-19 pandemic, his dismissal of the regulators was self-serving and unsupported by medical expertise or evidence. Worse, it was reported uncritically by the media establishment, many of whom neglected to disclose the money they receive from the Gates Foundation alongside their fawning coverage of its founder.

As a major investor in the pharmaceutical sector who has shoveled millions of dollars into development of seven different vaccines for the novel coronavirus alone, Gates stands to make trillions if one of “his” jabs eventually “wins.” He has made no secret of his desire to vaccinate the entire population of the earth, a mind-bogglingly expensive project that would presumably be paid for by the same hapless governments that have been bullied into assuming all the liability for the rushed jab’s side effects.

With the US and other countries already inking multiple high-dollar deals for hitherto-untested (and in a few cases, clearly unsafe) vaccines, the only potential obstacles to the biggest payday in pharmaceutical history are the regulators, which – though largely defanged and domesticated by a muscular pharmaceutical lobby – still require a few basic safety requirements to be met in order to roll out a new shot. After a patient in AstraZeneca’s vaccine trial was left with serious spinal cord damage, it was the FDA that voiced concerns about resuming the trial – even as British regulators merrily green-lighted potential further harms. Every regulatory roadblock is more money Gates has to shell out to eventually recoup his investment.

There’s good reason to be cautious. Pandemrix, the last rush-developed vaccine rolled out under the watch of the man in charge of the Trump administration’s vaccine gold rush – former GlaxoSmithKline vaccine director Moncef Slaoui – left hundreds of children ill, including brain damage, and cost the UK government millions of pounds in restitution payments.

Gates can perhaps be forgiven for his ignorance of the Pandemrix saga. After all, the Microsoft founder is not a doctor. He never even graduated college, let alone attended medical school. But his staggering financial success has been used to distract from his total lack of expertise, and especially since the pandemic began, he’s been carted out to speak on topics about which he knows next to nothing. From the utility of lockdowns (he loves ‘em) to hydroxychloroquine treatment (evil, bad, wrong) to conspiracy theorists (censor them), there’s no subject on which Gates’ word isn’t treated as gospel.

But it’s easy to see the conflicts of interest here, too. A population locked down for an extended period is much more likely to accept a vaccine as a condition for regaining their freedom, no matter how untested or unsafe. An effective, low-cost treatment for Covid-19 – which many doctors swear hydroxychloroquine is when administered alongside zinc and an antibiotic – would completely scuttle his universal vaccination plan. And given how many of those so-called conspiracy theorists are speculating about Gates’ real motivations (hint: the man who wants to surveil the entire surface of the earth from space and talks about digital “certificates to show who’s had Covid-19 or been vaccinated is probably not doing this out of a love for humanity), he has every reason to want them silenced.

Indeed, the conflicts of interest in the vast majority of Gates’ public statements are so obvious they wouldn’t even bear mentioning –  except that not one mainstream media article worshipfully reprinting his “words of wisdom” mentions them. With so few reasons to trust Gates, why is he still trotted out as an expert on every topic?

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hands out millions of dollars every year to news outlets to “inform and engage communities,” and most well-known English-language media are on their list of grantees. In addition to titles like the Guardian, Financial Times, National Public Radio, and NBCUniversal, the very entities supposedly tasked with guarding journalistic integrity are in Gates’ pocket. Groups like the Poynter Institute, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, the Center for Investigative Reporting, and the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting have all benefited from the vaccine magnate’s largesse. And by donating to entities like the New Venture Fund, Gates can funnel money to other media outlets without explicitly declaring where the money is going.

While representatives of the Gates Foundation have hotly denied their donations pay for loyalty (or, in the case of the fact-checkers who reflexively defend the billionaire against any and all unsavory claims, for selective truth-telling), a recent report by the Columbia Journalism Review found Gates had basically bought the most trusted names in news. More disturbingly, it found evidence that the Gates Foundation had in at least one case gone over the heads of reporters to pressure their editors to quash stories critical of it. Money talks, especially in the perpetually cash-strapped journalism industry.


  1. If someone shot him and cut his head off, it would not bother me. even if they did that to his entire blood line. It would not bother me. I would find the defendant not guilty.

  2. Give him the 3 finger salute Cntrl-Alt-Delete then the ‘blue screen of death” – microsoft style, obsolete and into the nearest landfill

  3. He’s another one who was set up by the City like his dad before him, who really stole Windows or Microsoft from the real inventor and gave it to him to reap billions as privatised tax collection really for telecommunications services which should be the government’s. His dad was the original baby killer abortion ust under the guise of “family planning” And its really about maintaining white supremacy Their class, rheir circle don’t abort their babies. They like Africans to abort and Asians and Indians. And poor white peasants.

  4. Journalists who preach their sermons are very well rewarded. Journalists who play the two party political delusion are well rewarded Most journalists are whores Some few aren’t. Many are just young a d naive and used as pawns because they’re too naive to know they’re gullible. Like cops and teachers and nurses and clerks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.