Elon Musk Ousts Fauci: “Gain-of-Function Is Just Another Way of Saying Bioweapon”

Fact checked
Elon Musk exposes Anthony Fauci - says gain-of-function is just another way of saying bioweapon

Twitter CEO Elon Musk slammed Dr. Anthony Fauci on Wednesday, accusing Biden’s Chief Medical Advisor of overseeing the creation of a “COVID bioweapon” which has killed millions around the world.

In several Twitter posts, Musk exposed incriminating information about Fauci with his followers.

“Almost no one seems to realize that the head of bioethics at NIH – the person who is supposed to make sure that Fauci behaves ethically – is his wife,” Musk said.

“‘Gain-of-function’ in this context is just another way of saying ‘bioweapon.’”

“Some good nuggets in article.”

“Important to note that Fauci authored 2012 paper arguing for gain-of-function research!”

“Obama wisely put this on pause, but Fauci restarted it.”

“Despite these glaring issues, Twitter nonetheless had an internal Slack channel unironically called ‘Fauci Fan Club.’”


Slaynews.com reports: Musk linked to a Yahoo article from May 2021 that said:

The Weekend Australian unearthed a paper Fauci wrote for the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012 in which he argued in support of gain-of-function research.

Such research involves making viruses more infectious and/or deadly.

Experts have raised the possibility that the COVID-19 pandemic could have originated from a potential lab leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where gain-of-function experiments on bat coronaviruses have been conducted.

Despite the risks involved, Fauci called gain-of-function experiments “important work” in his 2012 writing:

“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?

“Many ask reasonable questions: given the possibility of such a scenario – however remote – should the initial experiments have been performed and/or published in the first place, and what were the processes involved in this decision?

“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.

“It is more likely that a pandemic would occur in nature, and the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.

“Within the research community, many have expressed concern that important research progress could come to a halt just because of the fear that someone, somewhere, might attempt to replicate these experiments sloppily.

“This is a valid concern.”



  1. I’m. Really not interested in seeing twitter feeds as a news story. I’ve been trying to tell people his wife’s responsible because if her “ethics” of writing books targeted at college students calling for them to volunteer as Guinea pigs for big pharmas profits and powers in creating transhumans, which create an morality of nazi ism whereby people are just disposable commodities, just human resources to be exploited for the benefit of their superiors.
    Corporate law aka neo naziiism /fascism reigning over Christian theology. Like Satanism.

  2. It was`nt MR.marbells it was wayne MCcormack at HHMI playingFn dark program/SS kilroy,he killed millions cost trillions but MISSED (THE MARK)*** bb** hughes* hidden*

  3. So his wife is in charge of the bioethics… Small world – no pun intended Mister Fauci… Would you push your retirement date up to… say… tomorrow please?

  4. Huh, why didn’t the media make the connections between Fauci and his bioethical oversight over the past couple years?

  5. Gain of Function, has many uses. Some utility can arrive in the form of new medications. Yet, when the Wuhan virus escapes from the Chinese bioweapons laboratory, only the stupid fool would fail to connect the dots. The real shame, that Trump did not order massive conventional strikes against the facility in Wuhan, and its chain of command.

    • there is no “wuhan virus”. thats all idiocy. it was rebranding the common cold and flu as “deadly”. that was what escaped. fear porn.

        • Use common sense.try it it will prove your brain cells function. There is no “new”virus.that was proven by the fact none has been studied.hoaxes are intended to test the limits of believability of the masses. Cold and flu season arrives yearly. Just because some profiteers told you it was a different name doesn’t prove its other than colds or flu. The power of suggestion is amazing when dealing with gullible people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.