Kamala Harris Declared the Most Unpopular Vice President in US History

Fact checked
Kamala Harris deemed the most unpopular Vice President in U.S. history

The Democrats’ plan to install Kamala Harris as President is in disarray after new polls reveal that Harris is the most unpopular Vice President in U.S. history.

According to reports, people aged 18-29, the demographic that the far-left loves to take advantage of, only gave Harris a 36% approval rating, with 41% disapproving.

Per the Telegraph:

Alarmed Democrat strategists are grappling with the Vice President’s floundering poll numbers which show she is now “underwater,” meaning more Americans disapprove, than approve, of her job performance.

The White House intends to deploy her only in certain areas to campaign ahead of next year’s midterm Congressional elections, and will attempt to raise her profile by sending her on foreign trips in the coming months.

The disappointing first months of her term have also worried long-term strategists, many of whom had hoped she would run for president as early as the next elections.

Two recent polls both showed 46 per cent of Americans approved of Ms Harris, with 47 per cent and 48 per cent disapproving.

One of the most concerning elements for the White House is Ms Harris’s unpopularity among young people.

An Economist/YouGov poll found 41 per cent of voters aged 18-29 had an “unfavourable” view of Ms Harris, with only 36 per cent viewing her “favourably.” Ms Harris is also struggling with Hispanic voters, possibly due to her role leading US border policy.

Of the 48 per cent in the Economist/YouGov poll who viewed the vice president “unfavourably,” the vast majority [40 per cent] said they did so “very unfavourably.” Ms Harris has alienated some Hispanic voters by telling people from Central America “Do not come” to the US, while also infuriating conservatives and some independents by taking many weeks to physically visit the border.

A faltering performance in a high-profile TV interview with NBC in June left White House aides scrambling, and there have been numerous reports of dysfunction in her office.

According to Gallup 42.1 per cent approved of Mr Pence’s performance at that point, and 41.9 percent disapproved.

The previous vice president – Mr Biden – had an approval rating above 50 per cent after six months. Before that Dick Cheney, and Al Gore, were in the 60s at the same stage.

Even Dan Quayle, the much-mocked vice president of George H.W. Bush, was nowhere not underwater [sic] after six months.

He had an approval rating of 43 per cent, and disapproval of just 22 per cent, with 34 per cent undecided.

Thegatewaypundit.com reports: It appears as though Kamala telling Hispanics “do not come here” is one of her key gaffs:

Any guesses on what the democrats’ Plan C is?


  1. And the real poll results may even be lower :
    For instance :

    The Economist–YouGov poll

    July 10–13, 2021 — 1,500 U.S. Adult Citizens

    Registered 2020 Vote Party ID

    Dem (324) Republican (235) Independent (260)

    more Democrats sampled vs. Republicans were included in the
    results. It is not hard to get the results you want if the polls are
    assembled in this way, and this is always the method with these polls.

    A total of 819 from 1,500
    participants. Does that mean the rest were dumped because they are not
    registered to vote or affiliated with a party? Were their answers
    included in the reported percentages? Were the others thrown out for
    having the politically wrong answer? I guess they just disappeared
    overnight. Where have I heard that before?

    with all these polls affiliated with left-leaning organizations,
    there’s plain oversampling of those who have had 16-plus years of
    indoctrination and social engineering from the radicals who infest our
    local school systems and our state and private universities.

    these numbers are on the very last pages of pollsters’ methodology
    details. They tell the real story and highlight the bias of the media
    and affiliated academia members who assemble these polls. Just a little
    investigation by a real journalist would uncover grants above and
    beyond the norm for the university that participates. Attaching a
    university name to these findings is somehow supposed to give these
    untruthful polls street cred. Unfortunately, most of academia does not
    need much prodding to gin up these findings.

    So if you are of the “Left Media Type” or
    an esteemed member of “Academia,” try not to act so omniscient when you
    knowingly report lies to the public.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.