NYC Mayor, Who Banned Easter Church Services, Gives 400K Meals to Muslims Celebrating Ramadan

New York City socialist Mayor Bill de Blasio, who last month threatened to permanently close churches that do not comply with strict lockdown orders, has announced his administration will provide hundreds of thousands of free halal meals to Muslims celebrating Ramadan in the city.

Just weeks after threatening Christians and promising “enforcement agents” would shut down any Easter celebrations breaking lockdown orders, De Blasio described Ramadan as a “profoundly important holiday” and announced the city will feed New York’s Muslims holy meals until late May.

The Islamic holy month began Thursday and will run until May 23, and Muslims celebrating in New York City will be gifted with 400,000 halal meals courtesy of the American taxpayer, de Blasio announced.

De Blasio’s generosity towards the Muslim community sharply contrasts with his treatment of the city’s Christians amid the coronavirus crisis.

In March, the socialist mayor threatened to permanently shutter churches and synagogues, just weeks before Easter and Passover celebrations.

Now, de Blasio is literally catering to the city’s Muslims.

WesternJournal report: While the mayor and city officials were unprepared for the city’s health crisis and have shown Christians and Jews no sympathy during the related shutdowns, they’re now apparently sponsoring Islam.

De Blasio made the Ramadan announcement at a media briefing Thursday in which he lamented that Christians and Jews were unable to celebrate their respective holidays this month.

“We all wish that the celebrations of Easter and Passover could have been so different,” he said.

The mayor then described Ramadan as a “profoundly important holiday,” before announcing the city will feed New York’s Muslims holy meals until late May.

“One of Ramadan’s most noble callings is to feed the hungry. And it’s a crucial part of how the holiday is celebrated, to remember to be there for those in need. And that is now harder than ever,” de Blasio continued.

“Obviously, people can’t go to their mosques. In fact, mosques have often been a place that those who were hungry, those who were poor, would know they could go during Ramadan to break the fast,” he said.

“They knew there would always be a meal there for them. That’s not going to be true in this season. So, we want to, the city of New York wants to support this community as we’re supporting all communities.”

It’s nice to see the mayor step up and help a people of devoted faith during their time of worship.

But where were New York’s public officials as Christians and Jews attempted to attend church and synagogue services?

He was threatening them, and it was just three weeks ago.

“So, I want to say to all those who are preparing the potential of religious services this weekend — if you go to your synagogue, if you go to your church and attempt to hold services after having been told so often not to, our enforcement agents will have no choice but to shut down those services,” de Blasio said two weeks before Good Friday.

“No faith tradition endorses anything that endangers the members of that faith,” he said.

“So, the NYPD, Fire Department, Buildings Department, and everyone has been instructed that if they see worship services going on, they will go to the officials of that congregation, they’ll inform them they need to stop the services and disperse,” he continued.

“If that does not happen, they will take additional action up to the point of fines and potentially closing the building permanently,” de Blasio concluded.

The mayor made no mention of mosques in those comments.

While I am not arguing against feeding anyone in need of a meal during this time of crisis and uncertainty, and recognize that New York undoubtedly has a better hold on its number of cases and hospitalizations than it did a few weeks ago, de Blasio’s sudden goodwill approach toward people of faith reeks of favoritism toward Islam and thus raises questions about its constitutionality.

In Lemon v. Kurtzman in 1971, the U.S. Supreme Court established a “Lemon Test” weighing whether acts or policies by government are unconstitutional based on the First Amendment’s prohibiting the establishment of a religion.

In order to be constitutional, such a policy must have a nonreligious purpose, not end up promoting or favoring any set of religious beliefs and it must not overly entangle the government with religion, the court ruled.

While de Blasio’s contrasting policies for getting people of faith to stay at home during the coronavirus crisis might not end up in court, it would be interesting to hear him explain why he used a stick against Christians and Jews while offering Muslims a carrot.

• About
• Latest Posts

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Email: baxter@thepeoplesvoice.tv

Latest posts by Baxter Dmitry (see all)

• WEF-Linked Calgary Mayor Says ‘Never Being Able To Own a Home’ Gives You ‘More Freedom’ - April 19, 2024
• Biden Rewrites Title IX To ‘Protect LGBTQ’, Sex Now Equals ‘Gender Identity’ - April 19, 2024
• UN Report Declares ‘Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults’ - April 19, 2024