Ukrainian Officials: ‘Schift Show’ Special Witness Lev Parnas Is a “LIAR”

Fact checked
Ukrainian officials warn that upcoming impeachment witness Lev Parnas is a known liar

Upcoming impeachment witness Lev Parnas is a known liar when it comes to information about US aid to Ukraine, according to Ukrainian officials.

Earlier this week it was discovered that Parnas was prepared to testify before the ‘Schift Show’ against President Trump.

Thegatewaypundit.com reports: Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman are the two associates of Rudy Giuliani from Ukraine who were indicted by the Southern District of New York in October.

Parnas told The New York Times that back in May he told the Ukrainian government that unless the new Zelensky government opened an investigation into Hunter and Joe Biden.  According to The New York Times r Lev Parnas said Rudy “directed him in May of ’19, 2019, to call the president of Ukraine,” Zelensky, “and to tell him that Zelensky’s aid would not be forthcoming if he didn’t agree to investigate the Bidens.”

Rush Limbaugh described Lev Parnas as Schiff’s “surprise witness.

FOX News reporter John Roberts confirmed that Lev Parnas will likely be the Democrat Party’s surprise witness in the Schiff’s show trial.

Via Lou Dobbs Tonight:

But it looks like Schiff’s secret witness is a complete liar.

Ukrainian officials condemned Lev Parnas and say he is lying!

What Parnas said IS A COMPLETE LIE!

Benjamin Goldman at Pen Media reported:

Serhiy Shefir, the first aid to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, revealed that Democrat witness Lev Parnas lied about a meeting where he claimed he threatened to withhold military aid.

Parnas told the New York Times last week that he and Shefir discussed withholding $400 million in aid form Ukraine unless they investigated the Bidens. Shefir, however, doesn’t remember it that way.

Serhiy Shefir told Kyiv Post, an English language Ukrainian newspaper, that his meeting with Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman was “neither long nor informative”.

According to him, the only thing that Parnas and Fruman discussed was trying to set up a meeting between President Zelensky and Rudy, something they apparently didn’t even take seriously.

“We said that we will gladly meet with him, but only officially, after the inauguration, and that there can be no meeting now.”

Shefir said that Fruman and Parnas told him the point of the meeting was “they want to help this country” since they are Ukrainians themselves. Shefir, however, was not convinced.

“The meeting took place before we started at the job, and we didn’t get very deep into what their ‘help’ would be. These were general words said over a cup of tea.”

Serhiy Shefir also said that he didn’t really give any weight to either Lev Parnas or Igor Fruman, saying they didn’t consider them representatives of President Trump.

“We didn’t perceive them as representatives of the White House. Even now, I don’t understand what their role was. It was a meeting of private citizens with a private citizen.”

Read the rest here.

4 Comments

  1. Soviet Schiffs #KangarooCourt https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d9a057ba6f6d7d7424b767e6f220636bef357693bcf55545962e4dea89afa8c1.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/eca94e0167d64c6a0c04e17eefe033c44c67cce001b55dee4f7dd44ab8dfcded.jpg Here are the facts and nothing but the facts! This is how it’s unfolded!:

    1. Democrats initiate this sham impeachment based on 4th-person hearsay from a disgruntled Progressive, attempting to raise money on his 4th-person hearsay, later represented by a disgruntled Progressive lawyer. But really, democrats have been planning this as a back-up with Deep State traitors since at least day one of Trump’s Presidency.

    2. Pelosi confidently launches impeachment inquiry, thinking official records of the call will not turn up.

    3. Trump releases official transcripts of the call within 48 hours of the sham kick-off.

    4. Pelosi panics, when she realizes that the “whistle-blower testimony” is a complete and total fabrication, obviously designed with malice towards President Trump. No person who had actually had close access to that call would have ever drawn the conclusions or confused the words spoken, so much, as the “whistle-blower” did.

    5. Pelosi immediately tries to walk things back and claim it was just a casual assessment, nothing too formal yet. This was her last chance to abandon this plan, state “It appears the whistle-blower’s account does not accurately reflect the official transcripts of the call, so we really can’t use this particular information to open an impeachment inquiry. We need something more sufficient.”

    That was her last chance. But Pelosi got railed by the new extremists of The Democrat Party and finds she can’t back off. She threw caution to the wind, joined the political suicide pact of the extreme voices and jumped.

    6. The process begins but Democrats don’t really want this process they initiated. So they try to shift the narrative by claiming they are passive victims in this charade, that somehow President Trump is the aggressor in their unethical pursuit to unseat him.

    They lash-out at Republicans wanting to follow process, they act paranoid, guilty and defensive, dodging questions about the “whistle-blower”, getting angry when other members are trying to get the information they claimed they wanted, when they launched this thing. Why would they act so evasive and desperate to exclude Republicans, impacting how legitimate their inquiry looks? They’re not the ones being investigated, here: What are they so worried about?

    Of course we know what they’re so worried about but for the sake of the argument, we can wonder why they would be so focused on ensuring information tied to the whistle-blower not being uncovered.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.