One of the founders Greenpeace says that the environmental movement has been hijacked by the left, whose goal is to instill fear and guilt into the public.
In an email made public by the Epoch Times this week, Patrick Moore said that Greenpeace started as a science-based organization but it evolved into a “political fundraising organization,” which is why he left the group 15 years after its founding.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
Moore also explained that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is not a science organization but “a political organization composed of the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program”
“The IPCC hires scientists to provide them with ‘information’ that supports the ‘climate emergency’ narrative” he stated.
Breitbart reports: Moore said that environmental campaigns against fossil fuels, nuclear energy, CO2, and plastic are designed “to make people think the world will come to an end unless we cripple our civilization and destroy our economy.”
Green policies advocated by the left “are not technically achievable,” he declared, as evidenced by Europe’s energy crisis, “which Putin is taking advantage of.”
The crisis is of their own making by “refusing to develop their own natural gas resources, opposing nuclear energy, and adopting an impossible position on fossil fuels in general,” he stated.
Moore, whose formal science education includes a BSc Honors in science and forestry and a Ph.D. in ecology, said that virtually all of Greenpeace’s extensive advertising and fundraising campaigns are based on false narratives, such as that of the alleged polar bear crisis.
“In fact, the polar bear population has increased from 6,000 to 8,000 in 1973 to 30,000 to 50,000 today. This is not disputed,” Moore said.
“But now they say the polar bear will go extinct in 2100 as if they have a magic crystal ball that can predict the future. In fact, this past winter in the Arctic saw an expansion of ice from previous years, and Antarctica was colder during the last winter than in the past 50 years,” he added.
“I believe the human population has always been vulnerable to people who predict doom with false stories,” Moore said.
The environmental apocalypse theory is mostly about “political power and control,” he said, but the actual situation is not nearly as negative as people are told.
“Today, in the richest countries, our descendants are making decisions that our grandchildren will have to pay for,” he said. “Predictions that the world is coming to an end have been made for thousands of years. Not once has this come true. Why should we believe it now?”
Niamh Harris
Latest posts by Niamh Harris (see all)
- Soaring Numbers Of Foreigners Claim Asylum In Britain Despite Arriving On Regular Visas - December 2, 2023
- Vaccine Pusher Dr. Peter Hotez Warns Disease X Is Coming & Will Be Worse Than Covid - December 2, 2023
- Zelensky Admits Ukraine May Never Join NATO - December 2, 2023
It’s called the Hegelian dialectic, and it’s always been a reliable means of ruling by fear, which is why it was used for the scamdemic depopulation program.
Green energy is a GOOD thing no matter which way the wind blows
Green energy means nuclear energy and nothing could be worse for the future of the planet. Rhem talking green is all crap They mean nuclear.
There has always been wars and plagues that have reduced population. Now science US keeping people alive who should be dead, dick people needing constant profit making services Infertile women giving birth to babies usually who have sick babies themselves.
They lie. Always have They lie and murder and steal Always have from the beginning.
They always use scapegoats, in this case if climate change its is, we the people who demanded to be made dependent on electricity, who demanded an end to wood fires and wonderful chip hws and oil fuelled home heating which was fantastic, almost silent and really warmed your whole house super well withput blowing free ing cold air outside Billions of reverse cycle air conditioners have been used to make cities and high density populations believe that it is jotter in summer and colder in winter now. On purpose To deceive.
Oh for Gods sake join the dots Use your noodle. Its obvious as All of it.
There’s “Climate Change” on the planet Neptune, how may car exhausts are there?
NepTOON is nothing but GAS you bass!
New Study Finds Unexpected Temperature Changes on Neptune
A new study reports an unexpected, globally averaged drop of about 8 °C between 2003 and 2018.” Researchers, including scientists from NASA, analyzed ground-based images of Neptune taken in the mid-infrared range between 2003 and 2020.Apr 15, 2022
I GOT melted DONUTS all over the Dash!!! are you sure?
The Big name Nature and Climate ORGs are co-opted by industry and profiteers.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0bb87d75968836b84bb2be17c0fb30471ab1282fe01e1b261b9d260e39fc3347.jpg
Otherwise this would be on network TV and shown in classrooms.
of course it is fake. CO2 levels are the same as they always have been in recent recorded history. 1800s to now, the CO2 makes up .04% of the atmosphere. No change has occurred. none.
When the talk about C02 levels in PPMs, they are being deceptive. If you start your car in a garage and have a CO2 meter in the garage, yes the C02 ppms will drastically go up, but open the garage door the CO2 levels will quickly go back to .04%. The forces of diffusion and osmosis constantly even atmospheric gases around the planet exposing the CO2 to the leaves of plants, where they are absorbed and converted into carbon and oxygen.
This happens 24 hours a day over half the sunlite planet all the time. even the surface of the ocean have plankton that do this.
The CO2 “problem” is a complete hoax.
If CO2 was accumulating in the atmosphere, the aircraft fuel consumption charts, true airspeed charts and so on, would have to be updated, and fuel air mixtures of all kinds of equipment would have to constantly recalibrated.
I was arguing with a guy on the internet about where the CO2 went since it was still only .04%, he pulled a monkey out of his ass, telling me it accumulated high in the atmosphere forming a layer of CO2 as some altitude.
I then revealed I was a commercial pilot and never seen a warning from the FAA about not to fly at a certain altitude to aviod my engine from failing by flying thru a layer of CO2. I then quickly lost my account on that site.