Democrats Outraged after Texas passes law allowing users to sue Big Tech for Censorship

Texas passes law allowing users to sue social media for censorship

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram

The 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals has put a Texan law that allows Americans to sue far-left Big Tech companies back into effect.

According to reports, Texas introduced HB 20 last year after thousands of Trump supporters, including Donald Trump himself, were blocked on all of the main social media websites. A federal judge put HB 20 under temporary injunction in December, but that injunction has now been lifted.

BYPASS THE CENSORS

You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

Under the law, users will be able to sue Big Tech platforms with more than 50 million active monthly users such as Facebook and Twitter if they believe they were banned for their political views – something many argue is unconstitutional. HB 20 also bans social networks from removing or restricting content based on “the viewpoint of the user or another person.”

JOIN THE FIGHT: BECOME A CITIZEN JOURNALIST TODAY!

Engadget.com reports: Trade industry groups NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) managed to secure an injunction against the law last year. They argued that HB 20 would lead to the spread of misinformation and hate speech on social networks and that it also violates the websites’ First Amendment rights. The federal judge overseeing the case agreed that social networks have the right to moderate content under the First Amendment and also said that parts of the law are “prohibitively vague.”

In a hearing for the appeal filed by Texas, the state’s lawyers argued that social media platforms are “modern-day public squares.” That means they can be required to host content that they deem objectionable and are banned from censoring certain viewpoints. The 5th Circuit judges sided with Texas, with one even telling the trade groups during the hearing that social networks like Twitter are not websites but “internet providers” instead.

NetChoice counsel Chris Marchese called HB 20 “an assault on the First Amendment” and “constitutionally rotten from top to bottom” on Twitter. The trade groups plan to appeal immediately, but for now, HB 20 is fully in effect.

A federal court blocked a similar law in Florida last year after the judge ruled that it violates Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act that shields online platforms from liability for what their users’ post. Florida also appealed that decision, which will be decided by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.