A number of famous U.S. military heroes slammed Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman on Tuesday, calling him “prissy,” a “disgrace,” and “an operative with an agenda.”
Former Navy SEAL Carl Higbie called for Lt. Col. Vindman to be dishonorably discharged for conduct unbecoming, lying under oath and undermining the president of the United States on foreign policy.
Vindman on Tuesday earned the scorn of his military peers for testifying against his commander-in-chief, in uniform, before the House intelligence Committee as part of the Democrats’ unraveling impeachment inquisition.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
AMGreatness reports: Early in the hearing, Vindman tersely corrected Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), the top Republican on the Intel Committee, when the congressman referred to him as “Mr. Vindman.”
The awkward moment came amid a back-and-forth over the identity of one of an unnamed official Vindman briefed about President Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Vindman’s lawyer and House Intel Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) objected to the questioning because they said it would lead to the disclosure of the so-called “whistleblower’s” identity.
“Mr. Vindman, you testified in your deposition that you did not know the whistleblower,” Nunes stated.
“Ranking member, it’s Lieutenant Colonel Vindman, please,” the witness scolded.
Nunes continued to question Vindman about who he had spoken with following Trump’s phone call, addressing Vindman by his rank, and Schiff repeatedly interjected to prevent Vindman exposing the identity of the whistleblower.
Vindman said that he spoke with two individuals outside the NSC regarding the call, and that both were government employees with “a need to know.”
When asked which agencies they were with, Vindman said he spoke to State Department official George Kent, and “an individual in the intelligence community.”
Left outside the loop was Vindman’s immediate supervisor Timothy Morrison, a Europe and Russia expert for the National Security Council, who testified later in the day. When later asked by Rep Jim Jordan (R-OH) why he didn’t go directly to his superior with his concerns, Vindman replied that “it was a really busy week. Also the lawyer told me not to talk to anyone else.”
“And yet you talked to your brother, to George Kent, and a CIA person you won’t name,” Jordan argued.
Vindman has maintained, like Chairman Schiff somewhat unconvincingly, that he does not know the identity of the whistleblower.
Multiple military vets made biting comments on Twitter about Vindman during and after his testimony.
Tim Kennedy, an active, Green Beret, Special Forces Sniper with tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, said “correcting a civilian about how to be addressed is for sure a way to make everyone in the military think you’re a douche bag.”
Mark Geist, a member of the heroic Annex Security Team that fought the Battle of Benghazi, Libya, on September, 11 2012, called Vindman a “disgrace.”
Former U.S. Navy SEAL and special warfare operator Robert James O’Neill said Vindman is an “operative with an agenda.” O’Neill is widely credited with firing the shot that killed Osama bin Laden.
Former Navy SEAL Carl Higbie called for Vindman to be dishonorably discharged. Higbie served two tours of duty in Operation Iraqi Freedom, reaching the rate of Special Warfare Operator, First Class.
Former US Army Special Forces soldier Jim Hanson called Vindman “prissy” and “the Frank Burns of the NSC,” who is “hated by everyone in his unit.”
Legendary Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrell, the “lone survivor” of a elite four-man operation that went terribly wrong in Afghanistan in 2005, spoke up on Twitter when an Army vet attacked the president’s son Donald Trump Jr.
“I served this country too,” Luttrell said. “Our job as those in the uniform is to protect those that don’t wear it, not to defame them, especially the the First Family.”
Lt. Col (Ret.) Jim Hickman, who remembers Vindman as an anti-American partisan, was particularly irked by Vindman’s decision to wear his full military uniform, telling American Greatness that he did it “to again make him beyond reproach, and to make a political statement against the President. He should’ve worn his daily uniform, which is a civilian suit, period.”
The Iraq/Afghanistan war vet said that civilians are under no obligation to refer to officers by their rank but it’s considered proper etiquette to do so while they are in uniform. However, he told American Greatness that Vindman shouldn’t have been in uniform.
“LTC Vindman showed his pompous, arrogant side in today’s hearing by demanding Congressman Nunes address him as Lieutenant Colonel Vindman,” Hickman said. “The same arrogance he showed by advising the Ukrainians to do just the opposite of what President Trump’s policy was. The same arrogance that has him working against the President as a partisan in Congressman Adam Schiff’s sham impeachment.”
He added, “I witnessed this partisanship back in 2013 at Atlas Vision 13, and he hasn’t changed a bit.”
The retired officer went on to vent: “I cannot express how pissed off I am right now, having watched LTC Vindman have his ass kissed by the Democrats through the entire hearing to make him out as some sort of national hero, when I know he’s a partisan hack.”
Earlier this month, LTC Hickman shared his memories of Vindman’s disgraceful behavior in Germany on Twitter and with American Greatness. Later, the New York Times published an unfair hit-piece on the disabled vet, in an effort to discredit him.
LTC Hickman is a wounded warrior who fought in Afghanistan and Iraq and received numerous combat medals—including the Purple Heart. He took medical leave from the service in 2017 due to complications from his injuries
The Times didn’t refer to the war hero by his rank a single time in their piece.
“Makes me feel like all the harassment I went through was for nothing. Nobody even challenged his partisanship,” LTC Hickman told American Greatness.
The retired officer told American Greatness that his family has been receiving harassing and threatening phone calls since he decided to come forward with his story.
“My family and I have endured harassment for over two weeks now, because I stepped forward with the truth about Vindman. Today was a let down, and I call on anyone else who’s served with him and seen this same partisanship to have the courage to come forward,” he said. “Truth must be paramount, as there are those trying to malign against the constitution and the office of the presidency.”
Latest posts by Baxter Dmitry (see all)
- ‘Horrific’ John Podesta Snuff Film Circulating on Dark Web – Featuring Madeleine McCann - June 2, 2023
- Barack Obama Exposed As Secret Architect of ‘Pedophile Rights’ Movement in Schools - May 31, 2023
- Hundreds of YouTubers Who Pushed Covid Vaccines During Pandemic Now Have Turbo Cancers - May 31, 2023