Media Blackout: Mercenaries Attack Thousands of Native Americans

Fact checked
A systematic attempt by the elite to destroy communities of Native American tribes living in America is currently underway amid a total media blackout.

A systematic attempt by the elite to destroy communities of Native American tribes living in America is currently underway amid a total media blackout.

Recent footage has emerged showing corporate mercenaries, operating on behalf of Dakota Access Oil Company, using vicious attack dogs and pepper spray on thousands of peaceful indigenous protestors.

The violent attacks came one day after the Sioux Standing Rock tribe filed court papers identifying sacred sites and reiterating their claims the pipeline will pollute the Missori River and contaminate the water supply of thousands of people from their tribe.

It has also been revealed that over twenty major banks and financial institutions are banking on the pipeline going ahead.

On Saturday, Dakota Access Pipeline and Energy Transfer Partners brazenly used bulldozers to destroy our burial sites, prayer sites and culturally significant artifacts,” said tribal chairman David Archambault II in a press statement.

They did this on a holiday weekend, one day after we filed court papers identifying these sacred sites,” Archambault added. “The desecration of these ancient places has already caused the Standing Rock Sioux irreparable harm. We’re asking the court to halt this path of destruction.

On Sunday corporate mercenaries arrived with attack dogs and used the trained animals as weapons to illegally assault and terrorize the Native Americans. Protestors claim the dogs attacked human faces, as video evidence emerged of dogs with blood around their mouths.




The protests were launched on April 1 and have shut down construction along parts of the pipeline, however the violent and inhumane treatment of the Native American protestors on the holiday weekend represents a new low in human rights abuses perpetrated by the oil company and its financial backers.

If completed, the $3.8 billion pipeline would carry half a million barrels of crude per day from North Dakota’s Bakken oilfield to Illinois.

North Dakota pipeline protests

But at what cost? The project has faced months of stern resistance from the Standing Rock Sioux tribe who believe the pipeline will disturb sacred burial sites and contaminate the Missouri River – the water supply of 8,000 tribal members. Members of almost 200 other tribes from across the U.S. and Canada are protesting with the Standing Rock Sioux tribe in solidarity.

A federal judge is currently deciding whether construction should be stopped altogether, in response to a complaint filed by the tribe, which argues that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers illegally approved the project without their involvement. That decision is expected by Sept. 9.

Who’s Banking On The Dakota Access Pipeline?

The explosion of violence against protestors comes as a new investigation has exposed that more than 20 major banks and financial institutions are helping finance the Dakota Access pipeline.

The investigation, published by the research organization LittleSis, reveals that Bank of America, HSBC, UBS, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase and other major financial institutions have extended a $3.75 billion credit line to Energy Transfer, the parent company of Dakota Access LLC.

This interactive graph reveals who is banking on the pipeline going ahead:

UN Demands Avoidance Of ‘Further Human Rights Abuses’

Though the U.S. government and mainstream media is choosing to suppress the issue, a UN body has ruled that the Sioux must be included in planning of the pipeline project.

In a statement issued by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues on Wednesday, the forum’s chairman Alvaro Pop Ac called on the U.S. to provide the tribe a “fair, independent, impartial, open and transparent process to resolve this serious issue and to avoid escalation into violence and further human rights abuses.

Attack dogs were set on protestors on Saturday.
Attack dogs were set on protestors on Saturday.

Dalee Dorough, an Inuit member of the forum, said failure to consult with Sioux over the project violated the U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Article 19 of the declaration, which the U.S. endorsed in 2010, says: “States shall consult and co-operate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned in order to obtain their free, prior and informed consent before adopting and implementing legislative or administrative measures that may affect them. “

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Email: baxter@thepeoplesvoice.tv
Baxter Dmitry

7 Comments

  1. Best if the natives allow massive development of sun-power photovoltaics on their lands and encourage the use of electric transportation with energy derived from the sun. Elon Must will be happy to help them out. Thus the nasty Oil becomes redundant. But as long as the Natives drive gass guzzlers it is unfair of them to deny the passage of oil. Let Native americans lead the way by adopting non-oil dependent transportation

    • Who gave you the right to decide what the Native people should do with their lands.  They could drive around semi-trucks spewing oil and carbon everywhere and still refuse to allow anyone to do anything on their land.  

  2. THE FEDERAL TAKING OF OUR LANDS

    Q: If the management of Montana’s lands and resources is turned over to tribal control, what would be left?

    A: Not much.
    Here is a map of Montana that shows how much of Montana, and how may Montanans and businesses, would be subordinated and denied constitutional rights and protections afforded by the Bill of Rights if the tribes are used by F*USA to unconstitutionally further extend its unconstitutional jurisdiction.

    THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL “UNITED STATES”
    According to an authority no less than the United States Supreme Court, a second and parallel United States of America (I call it F*USA) has been created that is not subject to the Constitution nor the Bill of Rights. F*USA’s jurisdiction, however, is—or at least was—constitutionally constrained geographically to Washington D.C., federal enclaves, and U.S. possessions. Ever since that principle was established, however unconstitutionally, those who control F*USA have been extending their geographic control, or at least influence, to all lands within the legitimate USA.

    http://northwestlibertynews.com/what-would-be-left-of-montana/

  3. And all you people will do, is complain on here, or in your home. We are allowing our own downfall. If she wins by crooked means, you will still do nothing but complain. My fellow Americans, you suck on unfathomable levels!! Don’t ask what I will do, I will never share. Do not say there is a legal way to repair what is wrong. They will change the laws, or break your bank account, or charge you with false crimes. There is NO fixing this. Her winning, will be proof of that. YOU are the problem. YOU are the slaves, and YOU will do nothing to change it. Pathetic, weak, passive, and dumbed down. Afraid to stand for anything you claim to believe in. Fake patriots everywhere. Hell someone will probably report this to the slave masters, and claim I am a crazy extremist, pushing for violence. The violence from the govt, already exists. Women, children, and an old man. Murdered in front of your face, for not obeying the masters. Killary was involved in all of these murders, or helped cover it up. Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Burns OR. That is not counting her kill list. She killed to be elected to her first term. The pacifism and fear, are palatable and sickening. Do not speak down to me. Serving in an enforcement arm of the slave masters, does not constitute anything. It gives you even less right to speak on this subject. You are a brainwashed traitor to your oath. A STRAIGHT UP traitor, at worst. That is, if you have joined after Vietnam.

    • I agree with almost everything you say except for the last bit . Don’t knock our youngsters with a blatant blanket statement on entering our services . The problems we’re seeing is more than likely not a political fix .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.