A Pfizer spokesperson admitted company employees were given a “special batch” of Covid-19 vaccine, materially different to the vaccine distributed to the rest of the population.
The shocking revelation came during a Senate hearing in Australia, when the Pfizer spokesperson revealed that the Big Pharma giant imported a special batch of COVID-19 vaccines solely for their employee vaccination program.
Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts led the interrogation of Pfizer Australia’s Country Medical Director, Dr. Krishan Thiru, and Head of Regulatory Sciences, Dr. Brian Hewitt, with his forceful inquiries eventually leading to Dr. Thiru admitting Pfizer employees did not receive the normal vaccine. Watch:
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
The news that Pfizer employees were not jabbed with the regular Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine that was forced on the public is not surprisingly considering Dr Ugur Sahin, the CEO of BioNTech, the company that worked with Pfizer to develop the vaccine, admitted on camera that he did not get jabbed with the Covid vaccine either.
According to Sen. Roberts, Big Pharma made a fortune out of the Australian people due to the government’s hardline WEF-approved pandemic management.
Sen. Roberts demanded to know what role Pfizer played in the government’s decisions to make vaccines mandatory for employment and their participation in potential government bans on alternative treatments such as Ivermectin.
“Pfizer has no involvement, had no involvement in the imposition of vaccine mandates… Pfizer has had no involvement in relation to Ivermectin,” said Dr. Thiru.
However, the inquiry took a contentious turn when Roberts probed into Pfizer’s confidential indemnity agreements with the Australian government, suggesting that the taxpayers who funded the vaccine have the right to see the details of what they bought.
“Does the indemnity you have with the government extend to providing you with indemnity in the situation where an employee is forced by their employer to undergo vaccination and then experiences harm? And if you do have indemnity, I want the proof,” Roberts asked.
Dr. Thiru maintained that the specifics of these agreements remain confidential, per standard practice for contractual arrangements between the government and private organizations.
“Senator, any indemnity agreements between Pfizer and the Australian government are confidential and we are not able to discuss that in this forum,” said Thiru.
“Why are they confidential? Because as a taxpayer, I paid for those injections even though I didn’t take any. Why are they confidential? From taxpayers, 26 million Australians. What are you hiding?” Roberts asked.
TRENDING: Biden Announces ‘Depopulation’ Is Official US Government Policy
Roberts also queried about Pfizer’s own employee vaccination program, which Dr. Thiru confirmed was active and conducted in alignment with public health guidance, allowing accommodations or exemptions for those with specific medical or religious reasons for not being vaccinated. He did, however, acknowledge that a small number of colleagues departed the company in light of this program.
Roberts then questioned Pfizer’s use of a specific batch of vaccine for their employees that was not tested by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), to which Dr. Hewitt CLAIMED that this was done to ensure that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks.
“We’ve read that your vaccine mandate was using your own batch of vaccine, especially imported for Pfizer, which was not tested by the TGA. Is that correct?” Roberts asked.
Dr. Hewitt then responded, “So Pfizer undertook to import a batch of vaccine specifically for the employee vaccination program, and that was so that no vaccine would be taken from government stocks that was being delivered to clinics as needed.”
Roberts then asked, “Does your contract with the government for supply of COVID injections include a clause that negates your indemnity in the event of Pfizer committing a crime such as fraudulent treatment of trial data? The question is simple. What is the answer? Yes or no?”
Dr. Thiru was unable to provide a definitive response when questioned about whether Pfizer’s contract with the Australian government included clauses that would nullify their indemnity in the event of “fraudulent treatment of trial data.”
“Senator Roberts, as I had mentioned previously, the contents of Pfizer’s contract with the Australian government remains confidential, and I don’t have any information that I can provide to the Committee in relation to that,” Thiru said.
Roberts’ suspicion extended to the origins of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, questioning whether it was initially developed as a countermeasure for the American Department of Defence. Dr. Thiru responded, emphasizing the vaccine’s development was solely aimed at combating the global public health emergency resulting from the pandemic.
That’s right everything that matters is always top secret .Always Everything in the public domain is b/s or propagandas. Secrets aren’t in the public interest, aren’t suitable for public consumptipn Let them eat cake
Well you would have to have been very naive not to think that they werent personalising services delivery .
And BTW is his accent Swiss. You know, home of the Johnson and Johnson family of companies
Do you see how they’re making corporations living beings?
Of course, all the Top Crooks got the Sodium chloride 23.4% injection. And did you see the Usurper Joe Biden get one, knowing the Real “Vaccine” was Fatal?
Remember, the Top Politicians were Luring the Unsuspecting people into getting the Fatal Jab by themselves publicly getting the Sodium chloride 23.4% injection?
To Right the Democracy Boat, these people cannot participate in their Crimes any longer, to threaten Democracy, they will have to be marched up onto a Gallows for their final Judgement.
I personally prefer the “ Shoot them on sight” method !
That’s too LOUD a method.
Crusties got sensitive ears At least that’s something.
Only when you bend over.
Your just straight out delusional if you think any of your or any others fabtsues of justice are ever going jnv to be fulfilled Mental actually Like little kids. Off with the pixies in LA LA land
also known as distilled water
Look do you have to miss the whole point of EVERY story everyday?
The point is the fact that by keeping the terms of the contract with the government secret they have actually made the contract invalid in toto really No contract can contain secret terms which both parties are excluded from knowing and since the people are the government’s employers really then as their representatives rbey have no mandate to engage in secret deals over puic health which impact every citizen It’s illogical to believe they have that right.
Even hiding behind National Security is a misnomer, a devious twisted technicality, an abuse of power and the law because the people are rhe Nation. They can’t be kept in the dark about matters pertinent to each and every one of them by their representatives. But they have been so legally the confidential clauses on the agreement invidate it and only a corrupt Court would say otherwise.
And specifically to Australia which plays being a some sort of not Monarchy but not republic but something else which is all just rubbish really because it’s a fwdalist nation with a King as Head of State even less a Constitiuonal Monarchy because the Monarch can just sack the government here, and has. I don’t believe they can do that in England. The Queen sacked the Labor government because the Prime Minnster actually signed the nations wealth from natural resources over to the Pope, in effect It’s only come out 50 years after the event It was all garbage news at the time.
Anyway because the Head of State is Crowned in the Christian Church, although by a Druid (which is a whole other legal issue) then the intentions of the Act is to make the people believe the Monarch is.serving God of the Christian Bible. Now the Bible tells us that “Nothing that is done on secret comes from God” and that “God does nothing on secret”.
Therefore we know that since there is only God and Evil basically under the Tree of Life that any secret acts are evil and ungodly so illegal
Illegal.
I am thick, I missed the whole point of your comment.
citizens of “Babylon” – REVELATION 18… ‘their’ Ultimate Fate REVELATION 20:15
we still don’t know for sure if that recording is real or not. No proof. I certainly don’t disbelieve it, but I could record myself and my wife reading the same script and say it is joe’s daughter. Becareful. I do think Biden is a 100% perv for sure, but this video, recording, and article don’t prove jACK.
wwfexu
It’s very interesting! If you need help, look here: hitman agency