Prince Andrew has again been served with the sexual assault lawsuit, Virginia Giuffre’s lawyers have claimed.
He was finally served the lawsuit after his US lawyers received the relevent paperwork by FedEx delivery on Monday.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
Prince Andrew now faces the prospect of a highly damaging court case after repeated failures to respond to the claim appeared to have backfired.
Friends have reportedly urged the Duke to ditch his London-based legal team amid growing concern about its strategy. They say Andrew’s ‘wall of silence’ over the sexual case is increasingly damaging the monarchy.
Andrew will now have 21 days to respond to the claim or face a default judgment.
The Mirror reports: Attorney’s for Virginia Giuffre who has accused the Duke of York of rape in the first degree and sexual assault confirmed to a court in New York they had been formally sent yesterday.
In an email to the Prince’s American lawyer Andrew Brettler, Guiffre solicitors wrote: “Dear Mr Brettler, Pursuant to Judge Kaplan’s September 16, 2021, order granting Plaintiff’s motion for alternate service (attached), I am serving by email the Summons and Complaint in the above-captioned matter on you in your capacity as counsel for the Defendant, Prince Andrew, the Duke of York.
“We are also sending the Summons and Complaint by FedEx to your office at 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2400, Los Angeles, California.”
Within court papers submitted yesterday, Giuffre’s lawyers also included several receipts proving delivery by FedEx.
Last week Cesar Sepulveda filed an affidavit in the Manhattan federal lawsuit brought by Giuffre confirming he had served the papers to Andrew at his Royal Lodge on August 27.
He detailed how he had been repeatedly rebuffed in previous attempts to hand over the documents in which Queen’s 61-year-old son is accused of first-degree rape tied to late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s sex ring.
However, lawyers for Andrew’s said they had not been filed correctly seeing the UK courts step in to approve a way in which the Prince could be served.
Mr Brettler has described allegations of sexual assault filed in New York as “baseless, non-viable [and] potentially unlawful”.
The law suit specifies she was forced to have sexual intercourse with the prince against her will and lists offences including rape in the first degree
Last week he told a pre-trial conference call that a 2009 settlement between Giuffre and Epstein released the duke from “any and all liability”.
He also said the duke had not been properly served notice of proceedings.
Prince Andrew has consistently denied Ms Giuffre’s claims.
Mr Brettler – a Los Angeles-based lawyer promoted as a “media and entertainment litigation” specialist – requested a copy of the 2009 agreement, which is not public.
“There has been a settlement agreement that the plaintiff [Ms Giuffre] has entered into in a prior action that releases the duke and others from any and all potential liability,” he said.
Giuffre, now 38, was an accuser of Epstein, the billionaire convicted sex offender who died in jail in 2019, and claims she was sexually assaulted by the prince at three locations, including New York.
Niamh Harris
Latest posts by Niamh Harris (see all)
- Baltimore Barge Disaster Was A ‘Black Swan’ Event Says General Flynn - March 27, 2024
- Joe Biden Calls Putin ‘A Butcher’ - March 27, 2024
- Russia Blasts Bloomberg Article As ‘Mother Of All Fakes’ - March 27, 2024
Oh well, you know, the fruit doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Really it is a stupid case and she is a cheeky bitch She instigated it as her job as a sex worker which she had been doing ung since she was 14 . If Epstein told her to do it, he never forced her to do anything because when she said she wanted to leave he said fine and gave her a million bucks to help her out. She was never deprived of her liberty or her free will and could have left at anytime she wanted And I’m sure the reason her parents allowed her to leave home at 13 or 14 and go out into the world to become a street worker was because they knew she was an obstinate stubborn strong willed person who would do exactly what she wanted regardless of anything they tried to do. End of story.