Russia Warns US Not to Strike Pro-Govt Forces In Syria Again

Fact checked by The People's Voice Community

Russia has warned the United States not to strike pr0- government forces in Syria again.

The warning came from the Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov who relayed the message during a phone call with the US Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson on Saturday.

Lavrov said that Russia considers the recent US attacks on pro-government forces in Syria are totally unacceptable, and that the US must take all steps necessary to prevent any further clashes of this sort.

The US military carried out air-strikes on Pro-Assad forces three times since May, claiming that they posed a threat to US forces.

Russia Insider reports:

The US had multiple recent incidents in which they’ve attacked Shi’ite militia forces in southern Syria, accusing them of getting too close to a rebel base which has US personnel stationed in it. The indications, however, are that the Shi’ite militias in the region have been attacking ISIS and al-Qaeda forces, not the US-backed rebels at al-Tanf.

Russia has harshly criticized the US attacks, saying that they are risking cooperation in the fight against ISIS. Syrian officials have also issued a statement harshly criticizing the US attacks, noting that the US presence was never authorized by the government in the first place, and that they consider attacks on their allies within Syrian soil is a violation of sovereignty.

The US has maintained that its various attacks were done in “self-defense” because the “regime forces” got too close to the Tanf base, despite no suggestion they were moving against the base in the first place.

The US has made clear they are displeased with the Shi’ite militias’ efforts to reach the Iraqi border, and link up with Iraqi militia forces fighting ISIS there, but there appears to be no real basis for the US to prevent this move.

Niamh Harris
About Niamh Harris 15183 Articles
I am an alternative health practitioner interested in helping others reach their maximum potential.