A leading climate scientist has admitted that researchers push “pre-approved” establishment climate narratives in their papers – regardless of whether they are true or not – in order to get published in leading journals and further their careers in the field.
“Savvy researchers tailor their studies to maximize the likelihood that their work is accepted,” said Patrick T. Brown in an interview with The Free Press. “I know this because I am one of them.”
Brown continued, “I knew not to try to quantify key aspects other than climate change in my research because it would dilute the story that prestigious journals like Nature and its rival, Science, want to tell.”
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
“Editors of these journals have made it abundantly clear, both by what they publish and what they reject, that they want climate papers that support certain pre-approved narratives—even when those narratives come at the expense of broader knowledge for society.”
Rather than rigorously applying the scientific method to acquire knowledge, what Patrick T. Brown described can only be understood as writing fake news to artificially bolster the official narrative on climate change. According to Brown, this is the “formula for success in climate science.”
According to Brown, he omitted data including the fact that 80% of wildfires are started by arsonists, so that the woke editors at Nature would publish his article.
Brown, who also lectures at Johns Hopkins, added that the biases of the editors and reviewers of journals are well known among aspiring scientists who will often omit inconvenient truths to please them, a process he says “distorts a great deal of climate science research, misinforms the public and most importantly, makes practical solutions more difficult to achieve.”
Brown admits that he regularly hyped up the impact of greenhouse gas emissions, rather than offering practical solutions, knowing that is the “clean narrative” that journals want to see.
“In my paper, we didn’t bother to study the influence of these other obviously relevant factors. Did I know that including them would make for a more realistic and useful analysis? I did,” Brown wrote, adding “But I also knew that it would detract from the clean narrative centered on the negative impact of climate change and thus decrease the odds that the paper would pass muster with Nature’s editors and reviewers.”
I know, because our msm reported it decades ago that the bureau of meteorology had moved all the weather stations to areas where they knew they would get higher readings of about half yo one degree.
And again I just happened to watch 9/11bbc footage in anticipation of tomorrow’s commemoration of a grieving nation
Well still I’ve never seen footage of the plane s body falling down to the ground and still it’s somehow assumed that the whole jet flew completely into the building without dropping any bits anywhere Yet I’ve seen rhe photos of the gaping hole the plane apparently created and somehow there’s not one bit of plane inside their either Nothing at all.
Not one plane chair or any thing whatsoever and who were the passengers, come to think of it, on all these hijacked jets or were they hijacked empty and if so exactly how was that made possible.?Whenever I’ve been to any airport the securities been as tight as Fort Knox
Norhing is what it seems
Never trust anybody.
Theyre all in it together.
“and in the end times the whole world shall be deceived” Bible. I believe that means not by one thing or one body but by a multitude of interconnected activities operations manipulations deceptions (including by OMMISSIONS) distortions and fabrications like the Emperors New Clothes.
And also – – –
UPDATE Missing children +school Bus Mystery |Maui Massacre
Hustle Bitch You tube
NB Green laser captured on film by the University. 7 hours. Wtf?
10 minutes sorry I was watching 7 hours ago
I only post you tube videos because you tube is THEM and whoever is exposed by you tube is exposed by them You know who controls you tube.
Always remember nothing is what it seems.
And
Lahaona Fires Updates They said WHAT??
YOU TUBE.
Watching that video s incredible The story about that police Chiefs pa s death s unbelievable
1 how did they know that was her story when she was dead at the scene
2 if the thief stole he bag where were her car keys and her mobile phone? In her hand? Why wouldn’t she have a car that doesn’t need keys to unlock the door so she wouldn’t need to take them out of her bag?
Why if she had her mobile phone in her hand didn’t she just ring 911 and give rhem the thief’s number plate.? And why would she be so speeding chasing the thief that she loses control and slams I to a tree? No it doesn’t make sense His appointment to Hawaii doesn’t make sense She was a well respected member of community.
Judge Judy, if it doesn’t make sense it isn’t true.
Another day, another thread polluted with the mind numbing ramblings of Anonymous the Aussie pedophile.