Dismissal Of Pennsylvania Lawsuit Moves Us Closer to Supreme Court Say Trump’s Lawyers

Fact checked
Trump lawyers

President Trump’s campaign lawyers have said that they would file an appeal to the Third Circuit court after a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit to challenge the results of the election in Pennsylvania.

US District Judge of the United States District Court for Pennsylvania, Matthew Brann, predictably dismissed Trump’s lawsuit and claimed it would “disenfranchise almost 7 million voters.”

Breitbart reportsTrump 2020 attorneys former Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis said in a statement:

“Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the U.S. Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock.”

Breitbart reports: The lawsuit argued that the legal guarantee of “equal protection under the law” was violated after counties where voters were primarily Democrats took different approaches than counties where voters were primarily Republicans to help voters with problems with their mail-in ballots.

U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew Brann dismissed the suit on Saturday “with prejudice,” issuing a stinging rebuke to the campaign for trying to “disenfranchise almost seven million voters.” He wrote:

One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened.

Ellis and Giuliani argued that their evidence showed that 682,777 ballots in Pennsylvania were cast illegally, after poll workers denied the Republican party’s right to independent review, and said they wished to present their evidence in court.

“This is just an extension of the Big Tech, Big Media, Corrupt Democrat censorship of damning facts the American public needs to know,” they wrote.


  1. We ,the World WITNESSED Nancy Pelisi commit a criminal act as Speaker of the House with zero repercussions We then WITNESSED the criminal CORRUPTION of the Justice Department and the protection of criminal acts committed by democrats it facilitates. We know they are all corrupt and all in it together acting as traitors to Democracy itself We know they represent foreign powers .We saw her breaking the law with impunity .We know that means corruption has infiltrated the highest communities

  2. Dim bulb Obama judge refuses to recognize the fact that a single fraud vote negates or otherwise disenfranchises a legitimate vote.

    If one fraud vote negates one legitimate vote, then a thousand fraud votes negates a thousand legitimate votes, and so on and so forth.

    Regardless of whether or not Trump is re-elected, Democrat-Neocon vote fraud requires extreme punishment for disenfranchising legitimate votes.

  3. Do you want to know what we have to do? search up “Battle of Athens 1946” this on a national scale is what we have to do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.