Oxfam’s ‘Inclusivity’ Guide Tells Staff Not To Use ‘Offensive’ Words Like ‘Mother’

Fact checked

'Language guide' slammed by critics as woke garbage.


Oxfam has issued staff with a “bizarre” new “inclusive” language guide that warns against using a whole slew of normal words like “headquarters,” “local,” “people,” and “mother”.

The global poverty and hunger charity has been slammed for caving to absurd levels of political correctness.

They even apologized that the guide was written in English.

The indoctrination ‘guide’ states:

“We recognise that this guide has its origin in English, the language of a colonising nation. We acknowledge the Anglo-supremacy of the sector as part of its coloniality”

“This guide aims to support people who have to work and communicate in the English language as part of this colonial legacy. However, we recognise that the dominance of English is one of the key issues that must be addressed in order to decolonise our ways of working and shift power.”

Summit News reports: Apparently, merely using the English language is now racist and offensive.

The word “headquarters” is criticized because it “implies a colonial power dynamic,” while “field trip” is also frowned upon because it can “reinforce colonial attitudes.”

Staff are even told not to say they “stand with” people they support because it “potentially alienates people unable to stand,” while even the word “people” is to be avoided because “is often misunderstood as only referring to men.”

“Mother or father” are also verboten because it is important to “avoid assuming the adoption of gendered roles by transgender parents,” according to the guide, while “feminine hygiene” is also a bad term because it implies menstruation is dirty.

Even the terms “LGBT, LGBTQIX, homosexuality, gay and lesbian” are to be avoided because people who consider themselves part of “the whole LGBTQIA+ community” might be offended if the ‘plus’ isn’t used.

Critics slammed the ludicrous language guide and said that Oxfam should concentrate on charity work rather than policing the words people are allowed to use.

“In Africa, women have a one in 37 chance of dying in pregnancy,” said Maya Forstater, who founded pressure group Sex Matters. “But Oxfam seems to think what’s really important is erasing clear language about the very people who are most at risk.”

“How is ignoring and denigrating the world’s mothers good for development?’ she asked. “This guidance is trying to apply fashionable ideas about gender identity to people around the world who don’t think like this and are dealing with the ordinary problems men and women face every day.”


  1. Humankind still has the work man in it. This is getting so ridiculous. People now have to go to work or about their day walking on eggshells not to offend someone’s pronoun.

  2. From now on we have to expect more of these things and be enough wise. They will do possible thing to deviate human thinking from right choices. E.g. Never use words as depopulation or overpopulation, instead say freeing the traffic (WEF). People are more aware of what is going on.

  3. Labelling ,whilst convenient in one sense is dangerously dehumanising in another .For example my old gran would always refer to taxi drivers as “driver “.She didn’t mean to dehumanise them ,didn’t think she was being offensive but yet it made me cringe whenever I heard her saying it .I did tell her that I don’t like her saying it ,but she didn’t get it .And ,the worst part is I don’t think the “drivers “gave a rat’s either .

    • I mean no disrespect, of course, but I fail to see where it is wrong to call a cabbie driver “driver”.
      If anything I think this is super-correct.
      Why should WE do give a rats ass to learn/remember anything about this service provider beyond the function?

      He/she usually only exists for a brief moment in our lives and he/she has a certain right of privacy, too.

      And how should we rather address the cabbie?

      “Mr. Mukherjee of the fair city of Delhi, now Boston, holding valid and driving licenses and identifying as he/him”?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.