Stephen Hawking Died And Was Replaced in The 80’s

Fact checked
Stephen Hawking died in the 80's and was replaced with a lookalike

The real Stephen Hawking died in the 1980’s and was replaced with a lookalike, according to astonishing new photographic evidence compiled by conspiracy theorists online. 

According to internet sleuths, simple photo analysis will reveal that the the real Stephen Hawking was replaced many years ago, and the public have been duped into thinking that Hawking is one of the only ALS sufferers to live such a long life.

Miles Mathis reports: I have written several papers critiquing Stephen Hawking, including a long one on his Brave New World series for the BBC. But this is my first paper really linking my science research with my faked events research. I will use simple photo analysis and facial analysis to quickly show you the current Stephen Hawking is not the same person as the original Stephen Hawking.

This should not surprise you too much, especially if you know something about ALS. ALS is Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease. We are told Hawking has had ALS for over 52 years, which is a record by many decades. Jason Becker is the only person I have heard of who has lived more than 20 years with the disease, so there is about a three-decade difference between the longest survivor and the second longest survivor. That is a more than 100% difference between first and second place. It would be like Justin Gatlin running the 100 meters in 9.8 seconds, and Usain Bolt beating him with a time of 4.5 seconds. In other words, statistically it doesn’t happen.

The average survival time for ALS is four years. When Hawking was first diagnosed in 1963, doctors gave him two years to live. And yet here we are, 52 years later and counting. Should you believe it? Well, no. Like Becker, it appears the real Hawking did beat the odds and live for about 20 years. But at some point he was replaced. I have no proof he died, but I assume that is why they replaced him. He was a very useful public relations entity for physics, and they didn’t want to lose him.

But rather than speculate on that, let us go right to the evidence. I won’t call it proof, since of course you are free to disagree with me. This is an opinion piece, not a court transcript; and even if it were a stamped court finding, you would be free to disagree with it. You don’t have to agree with anything anyone tells you, ever. Remember that. This paper is nothing more than presented evidence, evidence I find compelling. If you also find it compelling, fine. If you don’t, also fine.

The picture under title is the real Hawking. Notice the longish face and skinny neck. Also notice the dark brown hair. Here is another picture of the real Hawking:

Let that etch into your brain. This is also Hawking, a few years later:

You see that his hair is turning gray. But the thing to notice here is his teeth. Pretty awful, right?

Well, it gets worse.

He is now fully gray, and he has pretty much lost his lower teeth. I am not a dentist and don’t know exactly what is going on there, but it looks like those teeth have been filed down or chipped down, with only stub fillings left. The next step would be dentures, right?

Well, no. The next step, apparently, was going from gray to blonde, even in the eyebrows, and a whole new set of old yellow teeth. He also bought some new fat cheeks. Amazing right?

Actually, that is the replacement. That isn’t Hawking, as I hope you can see now that I point it out. Go back two photos and compare the teeth directly. Not even close. They found a guy with the same nose and big ears, but otherwise they don’t look that much alike. This is the guy you have been looking at for the past thirty years. Which means Hawking might not have written A Brief History of Time, which came out in 1988. I haven’t pinpointed the date, but that was about the time they made the switch. My current guess is early 80’s, which—if true—would mean that book was a forgery.

You will say, “That is just a younger Hawking, before he lost those lower teeth.” No, it isn’t. I just showed you the younger Hawking, and he didn’t look like that. Compare them side by side.

Besides, the first picture is Hawking from the 1970’s. The second is Hawking from the 1990’s. Amazing that he aged 20 years with a debilitating disease and got younger looking at the same time, isn’t it?

Hawking was still looking young in 2007, when he went aboard the ZeroG Plane:

See how it says “zero g” on his shirt? That is from when he went up in the plane, which was in 2007. He was supposed to be 65 in 2007. Looks great for 65, eh? Unfortunately, he already looked older than that in 1982, 25 years earlier:

His face also got shorter. Normally your face will get longer as you age, not shorter.

Here is a more recent photo of the impostor:

Again, the teeth are the clue. This may be the same guy as our blonde impostor, but it certainly isn’t Stephen Hawking. Go back to the earlier photos. Those four lower teeth were supposed to be gone decades ago, filed down to filling nubs. Are we supposed to believe they regrew? Do those look like caps or dentures to you? Would you pay a dentist to replace your teeth with those? No, we are supposed to believe that is what he has left of his real teeth, obviously. But I have just shown you why that cannot be the case.

Here is a photo I found of the blonde impostor where is it really easy to see he isn’t Hawking:


  1. What is this rubbish?! Can ALS be staged by an actor? My god! S. Hawking has grown up children. Dna test can prove any time his identity.

  2. Look at the man’s ears. On all the photos they are identical. Ears are the hardest part of the human face to fake

  3. Teeth and his face are not at all identical. Moreover yes, I do believe as human beings grow older, face becomes longer instead of being shorter. So according to me something fishy is there. Obviously life tenure is one of the most important part for the disease ALS.

  4. He is a very very creepy spastic….. he is a tool of satan and has been used very effectively by the power elites…ewww every time I see the little spastic he creeeeps me out…ewww creeepy

        • He is more accomplished and beloved than both your useless asses could even dream off. He will be missed by millions and remembered in history, if you offed yourselves you’d be doing society a favour.

    • Big alert. The username is “hesofuckincreeeepy.” And science isn’t the devil’s work. And I’m gonna piss you off: Humans are a result of evolution.

  5. “He should have longer face”
    OMG, he has no teeth on last picture, that means no mouth and shorter face. Your logic is shit

    • rtards you believed in a vegetable in a wheelchair that couldn’t move a muscle except for his cheek muscle and was able to use a magic talking machine with that muscle? Think of his healthcare alone and how many hours a day he needed to be fed and changed and after all that he could write books with complicated formulas with his cheek, wake up people.

      • hthere was no magic, but technology from Intel. the sensor on his cheek detected movement and changed the location of the cursor on his screen. he also used autocorrect on his on-screen keyboard

  6. For me, the teeth are the clincher.
    The 2017 teeth, front, lower jaw are very, very much better than the 1982 teeth yet they are definitely real.

    I’ve long had suspicions about Mr. Hawkins, not the least for the fact that, despite the total failure of conventional medicine (but, then, some people are stupid like that) he refused to even consider trying methods which do work for this easy to heal variation upon the theme “Mercuric Poisoning” – presumably from his many amalgan fillings plus a heavy handful of vaccines.

    Blessed be

    Karma Singh

  7. Same W-shaped creases and vertical indentation between eyebrows in both “real” and “fake” Hawking.

  8. Some days,I swear Kim Kardashians ass is smaller than usual. She must’ve also died and they have a stunt double of her to keep her,whatever she does for society,alive. SMH

  9. Wouldn’t the “new Hawkins” have to have lived as long as the “old Hawkins” to look as old as he does? So not 1 but 2 men with ALS have lived for 50 years?

  10. “But this is my first paper really linking my science research with my faked events research.”

    Oh lawd, this here is premium Dunning-Kruger in action. Ignorant, uninformed assumptions are not a valid substitute to actually knowing what you are talking about Yournewswire

  11. I know Stephen Hawking died before. I hated him and gloated when he died before because of the way he would talk about God. He hated God. And I remember telling someone close to me, my dad maybe, that I was glad he died and that he will now know that there is a God. I am sure as heck of this. Just hope he keeps him DEAD this time.

    • Hawking was a Deist{agnostic-deist} for most of his life and career, in the last ten year or so he became an agnostic-atheist but still kept his mind open to the deistic ideas.
      He didn’t “hate God”. He believed in and revered God for most of his life and later on in life became agnostic-atheist but kep an open mind, he didn’t “hate God”. The claim is absurd.

  12. This is honestly retarded. The “imposter” would have to have matched the same wit as Hawking and the “fake” Hawking would have to learn his memories. Hawking is actually dead since March 14, 2018 and may his soul rest in peace now.

    • Matthew Baloney his magic talking machine was someone else typing, sorry to burst your bubble.

  13. Jesus Christ, what a piece of crap of an article. I found zero logic on any of your statements. LMAO I will share with my friends so we can have a good laugh.

  14. It’s the same man. I used to think it wasn’t too, but, honestly, if you really look at the minor features (forget the teeth-that was someone’s bad press idea), you can see it. In the ‘82 and ‘07 side by side, you can see the cupid’s bow on his lip is the same, the slight crookedness of the nose, the dent in the furrowed brow and even the natural “swoop” of the hair line.
    It’s the same guy.

    It could very well just be that he was more depressed back then (wouldn’t you be??)
    And that it wasn’t until much later in his life that someone started caring for his physical appearance more (hence the blonde:) and wanting to “spruce” him up.
    As for the reshaping of the features, no teeth would cause the mouth and jaw to pull up lending the look of a smaller face.

  15. My brother has it and he has forgotten the past all ready. and the Doctors only give him two- to five years to live and it hasn’t been a year yet. So yes I can believe you are right he is and imposer today.

  16. Even though i have to agree, that his teeth are not what one would expect right away, i find it disgusting to see how you’re calling him an imposter. You have zero evidence in your little opinion piece. It seems the only imposter here is you, claiming to write an article like a real journalist, while instead all you write is your opinion and some insulting lies, based only on a few photographs. Do some research next time, put in some work and don’t just fill the world with more thoughtless stupidity.

  17. Whoever wrote this is an idiot. “Look the guy who is bound to a wheelchair looks different almost 30 years later.” Yah think? It’s the same person. Time does this to people and even more so if the person can’t get around like the rest of us. I’m sure he had some things done as time progressed because his popularity progressed. Did you know who Steven Hawking was in 1982? Whas the author even alive then? You can see that same imperfections I his face on all the pictures. You will see in life time changes people as you get older.

  18. 1.loosing the front upper teeth row does make the face shorter, the face “falls in itself together” without the (front) teeth row(loosing teeth changes a face completly)..2. he has as young man these two little dips/dents on his forehead excact between the eyebrowes – also as older man on later foto, exact can be dyed blond..?! 4.the “fuller cheaks” cud come from cortison, or other medicin…?! 5. if he had the bottom row of teeth done in end ’80, (jacketcrowns or whatever)then they’re not so “perfect” anymore..?! (sorry, if my english is not correct )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.