Trump: If Judge Jackson Can’t Say What a Woman Is How Can She Say What the Constitution Is?

Fact checked
Jackson Trump

Donald Trump has blasted Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson saying if she is unable to provide the definition of a ‘woman’, she would not be able to interpret the plain language of the Constitution.

“How on earth can Judge Jackson say what the Constitution is if she can’t say what a woman is” he said

The former president made his comments while speaking to thousands of supporters during a ‘Save America’ rally in Commerce, Georgia on Saturday night

During his speech Trump added that “a party that’s unwilling to admit that men and women are biologically different in defiance of all scientific and human history is a party that should not be anywhere near the levers of power in the United States.”

Breitbart reports: Trump was reacting to Judge Jackson’s bizarre refusal to define the word “woman” in her confirmation hearings last week at the Senate Judiciary Committee to define the word “woman” when asked to do so by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN).

Though Judge Jackson claimed to be something of an originalist, who looks to the plain meaning of words in the Constitution and the law before making her own interpretation, her refusal to define a common word suggested otherwise.

Trump told his audience:

The left has become so extreme that we now have a justice being nominated to the Supreme Court who testified, under oath, that she cannot say what a woman is. If she can’t even say what a woman is, how on earth can she be trusted to say what the Constitution is?

[Applause]

And a party that’s unwilling to admit that men and women are biologically different, in defiance of all scientific and human history, is a party that should not be anywhere near the levers of power in the United States of America.

[Cheers]

Judge Jackson told Sen. Blackburn that she could not define “woman” because she is not a biologist, though the likelier reason was to preserve fluidity in her opinion in the event that she ruled on cases involving transgenderism.

5 Comments

  1. If she can’t say what a woman is then she can’t say what she is. So she’s pretty well stuffed. End of.

  2. it`s all in the GENO`s as far as the facts go.Re-asignment surgical female or male or natural..Trannys are nothing new at all or gender benders just some lost in the massificational`s trying to get the HIGh stage lamps.WATCH OUT when TRANSHUMANISMs upgrade as then SUPER humans will leave non-super humans in the dust.

  3. Trump is tryin to gear up but the gear BOX is stripped and leaking so maybe go a transhuman Upgrade with new plastic hair and plastical monkey suit new teeth new eyes lift everything up and putin the biden chips and forced harmonic motions and brainwave oscilatations and you just mite be the new robot transhuman we are looking for? MARfe turus? plasmid spin robot?

  4. Don’t recall the Republican assassins asking Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch to define what a man is or Amy Coney Barrett to define what a woman was! But as we know, Republicans prefer to support the nomination of sexual abusers like Kavanaugh, but slander and attack credible and highly qualified nominations that are embarrassingly more competent than Cruz, Graham and Hawley ever will be.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.