Unilever Boss Demands Social Media Ban Alt. Media Outlets

Fact checked
Unilever chief demands internet giants censor independent media outlets

The boss of advertising giant Unilever has called for an immediate ban of all independent media outlets on social media platforms. 

In an unprecedented set of public demands to Google, Facebook and Twitter – Keith Weed, the chief marketing officer of Unilever, threatened to withdraw billions of dollars of advertising revenue unless they suppressed non-mainstream views.

Wsws.org reports: Weed reportedly told an annual leadership meeting of the Interactive Advertising Bureau in Palm Desert, California that the company “will not invest in platforms or environments” that “create divisions in society, and promote anger or hate.” He added,

“We will prioritize investing only in responsible platforms that are committed to creating a positive impact in society.”

Excerpts of Weed’s remarks—the most explicit of their kind from a major corporate executive—were leaked to several media outlets, including the Wall Street Journal and the Guardian. They were immediately featured on NBC News and other major American news outlets on Sunday. The Journal’s report was accompanied by an interview with Weed.

The coordinated release was designed to escalate the propaganda offensive by the Democratic Party and US intelligence agencies, together with the corporate media, for Internet censorship. The fraudulent premise for this assault on freedom of speech, both in the US and across Europe, is the claim that political opposition and social tensions are the product not of poverty, inequality and policies of austerity and militarism, but of “fake news” spread by Russia through social media.

Weed’s statements preceded yesterday’s US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence hearing, which witnessed a series of hysterical denunciations of Russia by politicians and intelligence agents. The Democratic vice-chairman of the committee, Mark Warner of Virginia, declared that Russia “utilized our social media platforms to push and spread misinformation at an unprecedented scale.”

Facebook responded to Weed’s threats by declaring,

“[W]e fully support Unilever’s commitments and are working closely with them.”

The Journal stated that Unilever “has already held discussions” with Facebook, Google, Twitter, Snap and Amazon “to share ideas about what each can do to improve.”

Weed absurdly framed his demand for censorship, made on behalf of a multibillion-dollar global corporation, as the expression of popular anger over the supposed spread of “fake news.” He referred to research showing a decline in trust in social media and a “perceived lack of focus” in the form of “illegal, unethical and extremist behavior and material on” social media platforms. Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, he claimed to be articulating the concerns of consumers over “fake news” and “Russians influencing the US election.”

In reality, the intervention by Unilever—a consumer products behemoth with a market capitalization of $157 billion and annual revenues of $65 billion, more than the gross domestic product of many countries—only highlights the economic and political forces driving the censorship campaign: an alliance of the military/intelligence apparatus, giant technology firms and the corporate-financial oligarchy.

Unilever’s annual marketing outlays of nearly $9 billion place it in the top five companies in that category globally. It owns dozens of brands used by some 2.5 billion people around the world, including Dove soap, Rexona deodorant and food products Cornetto, Magnum and Lipton. Weed’s statements amount to a declaration that Unilever will use this economic power to filter what the world’s population can and cannot read online.

This is in line with a long and reactionary tradition. Large advertisers played a significant role in enforcing the McCarthyite witch hunt of socialist and left-wing figures in the US during the late 1940s and 1950s. General Motors, DuPont, Reynolds Tobacco and other major companies were backers of the notorious anticommunist periodical Counterattack, which published names of suspected communist sympathizers and forced the removal of targeted performers and critical content from programs they sponsored.

In one of many such cases, the blacklisted Jean Muir was dropped from the television show “The Aldrich Family” after General Foods, the program’s sponsor, told NBC it would not sponsor programs featuring “controversial persons.”

In another development, Susan Wojcicki, the CEO of YouTube (owned by Google’s parent company, Alphabet), told a Code Media conference in Los Angeles that Facebook “should get back to baby pictures and sharing.” The statement is a reference to Facebook’s announcement last month that it is deprioritizing news content on its News Feed in favor of “personal moments.” The change is one of a number of recent measures to prevent Facebook users from accessing news and analysis outside of officially sanctioned corporate outlets.

UK Home Secretary Amber Rudd on Tuesday released a government-developed application that uses machine-learning algorithms to automatically detect ISIS-related content in videos so that it can be censored.

The BBC wrote that the tool was seen by the government as a way to demonstrate that its “demand for a clampdown on extremist activity was not unreasonable.” Rudd stated, “The technology is there. There are tools out there that can do exactly what we’re asking for,” i.e., identifying and censoring video content. The new application will be provided free of charge to smaller video hosting companies, and the government will consider making its use legally mandatory.

The Washington Post, which along with the New York Times has been at the forefront of the censorship campaign, linked the UK government’s announcement to the intervention of Unilever, writing that it came “amid mounting pressure on social media companies to do more to remove extremist content from their platforms.”


  1. Ban alt media….because censorship in needed in a free society? Maybe mainstream media should be banned, they are the CIA controlled fake news. Either way Unilever should be boycotted!

    • I completely agree that Unilever should be boycotted, although, for more obvious reasons pertaining to the health of the ingredients they use.

      • Google pays to people of all ages $99 per-hr to complete few task off a home computer .. Work only for only few hours daily & have more time with your own family … Any one can also join this super post!last Tuesday I bought a gorgeous Subaru Impreza just after earnin $11582 past month .it is absolutely the best work however you could now not forgive yourself if you do not learn this.!ow13g:➩➩➩ http://GoogleBankGetOpportunity/get/98$/everyhour ♥x♥s♥♥t♥c♥♥g♥♥j♥g♥♥b♥u♥l♥c♥j♥♥♥f♥r♥♥y♥♥a♥♥♥a♥m♥♥♥d♥♥s♥x♥♥q♥♥♥c♥♥♥p♥r::::!ae041p:cn

  2. This unilever


    Supporting diversity and inclusion
    Leena Nair speech
    Leena Nair, our Chief HR Officer explains our approach: “We work with women in the workforce to help build the confidence needed to navigate a biased world. We work with men to increase their understanding that [their replacement and expulsion] a balanced workplace is good for [their replacement and expulsion] them and for business. We work across the whole organisation to ensure we build a corporate culture in which women and men can thrive together.”

  3. I can see how there is perhaps a tangential chance that this move was not done out of a spirit of malice, because, to be fair, on some alternative news media outlets, the rage and hate there really serves no further purpose than just inciting more divisiveness (not that there is anything unique about that, similar rage and hate are found on mainstream news commentary too). However, as bad as that is, the solution is obviously not censorship, but just rational individuals speaking out to foster constructive debate on both “sides”. Change must start with conscientious, respectful, and highly disciplined individuals – at grass roots level, motivating change up to the top; a top down approach sounds too much like tyranny, and will ultimately backfire. In my personal opinion, most alternative news sources and mainstream sources, though in word preaching disparate goals, are both funded to cause division among the people. I guess I think what would evil masterminds do to really divide people? They would first make outrageously corrupt mainstream news sources and oppressively employ them; some would be duped into those perspectives. Then, for those who remain, it would capitalize upon their disgust with the mainstream media and initially create a “resistance” camp of “alternative” news. This would probably start out legitimate, but then itself start radicalizing it’s perspective so that rather than bringing people hope in unity and cooperation, it would instead result i

  4. Just looked at the list, Firebred. I sure am going to miss my chocolate Klondike bars this summer but that’s the price you have to pay or should I say that’s their little loss on my part.

  5. Any info on J.L. Audio, Firebred. I want to know if I made a mistake handing them some major bucks this week. It’s like we must look at everything we buy to make sure we aren’t supporting our own enslavers.

  6. Yea, thanks to you too. Had to pick up a JL W7 13 AE to replace a detonated Rockford 12″T2 that took major abuse for 6 years and just recently the voice coil finally shattered to the point that it wasn’t musical anymore. This beast weighs over 50 pounds without the box. Can’t wait to get it installed and see how this top notch sub kicks.

      • I wanted a Morel Ultimo because of their unmatched accuracy and musicality but I also listen to metal so I wanted something with decent musicality along with the sheer brute force that the W7 Anniversary Edition is known for. They’re actually built in your neck of the woods, KEK.

          • I like Alice In Chains too. In my opinion, the 1990 Megadeth album ; “Rust in Peace ” is a metal masterpiece unequalled in the genre. Dave Mustaine is a natural writer and phenomenal metal guitarist although a little crazy. If that stuff doesn’t get your blood pumping than you’re probably dead.

  7. Oh.. I know when I’ve had enough. Those low 25 hz organ notes of Pink Floyd are a religious experience though, with a good one.

  8. Beautiful. I love lasers in a concert hall. They are so mesmerizing. There is a song on that album called: “Bring the Boys Back Home.” It is so triumphantly British.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.