Biden Declares War on Second Amendment, Signs Executive Order to Destroy Gun Rights

Fact checked
President Joe Biden has signed an executive order that will have dire consequences for the Second Amendment rights of Americans.

President Joe Biden has signed an executive order that will have dire consequences for the Second Amendment rights of Americans. The order was signed on Tuesday and will lead to an increase in the number of background checks required to buy guns.

Biden’s latest efforts to curb gun violence are part of his administration’s plans to take away Americans’ right to bear arms. He is determined to push for strong changes as he inches towards a 2024 run, his aides say.

“Too many lives have been taken by gun violence,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said. “But he believes we need to do more. You’ll hear him call on Congress to take action and not to stop … that we need to continue.”

The executive order will direct federal agencies to ensure compliance with existing laws and procedures. This could have far-reaching consequences for gun owners, as it would allow the government to increase its control over firearms.

The plan calls on Attorney General Merrick Garland to shore up the rules for federally licensed gun dealers so they know they are required to do background checks as part of the license.

The president is also mandating better reporting of ballistics data from federal law enforcement for a clearinghouse that allows federal, state, and local law enforcement to match shell casings to guns.

Biden is asking the Federal Trade Commission to issue a public report analyzing how gun manufacturers market to minors and use military images to market to the general public. This could be used to further limit the marketing and sales of firearms.

This latest move is a clear indication that the Biden administration is not interested in protecting the Second Amendment rights of Americans. It is up to responsible gun owners to stand up and fight against this attack on their rights.

Gun control advocates are hailing the executive order as a “home run for public safety,” but the reality is that it is a direct attack on the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding Americans.

18 Comments

  1. executive orders are illegal and unconstitutional. no laws can be made from the bench or the white house, only congress. and the 2nd amendment can not be made illegal. impossibility.

  2. Everything’s followed having Francis placed as the first Jesuit Pope into position by the Vatican elite in 2013. Everything’s come from that. They made their mlitary corps the top of the heap. Everything is their crusade to conquer the whole world and everyone in it.

  3. American gun owners should start using the 2A for how it was written . This guy is delirious if he thinks he is going to run again for 2024

  4. I double dog dare you Obidenbastard! Come to the Appalachia Mountains with your best transgenders to get them.
    Trespass at your own peril. Our dogs are hungry for leg of G man.

  5. The 2nd Amendment is the cure for tyrannical government.
    “When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

  6. Beware Caesar, the Ides of March. President Xis organised a Saudi Iran trilateral agreement restoring their diplomatic ties, to take effect in no less than 2 months, and the creation of the enlargement, quite likely of BRICS.
    So ww3 s a definite event, that and the aukus nuclear sub news confirm without any doubt a lengthy engagement of, I’d guess at least ten years.
    So ww3s here now. Beware Caesar, for revelations predicts your Fall.

  7. An “Enemy Within” Masquerading as a Public servant.

    “Where Rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”
    Miranda v Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court, 384 US 436, 491 (1966).

    “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v U.S. 230 F 486, at 489

    “If a state converts a Liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the Right with impunity.” Shuttlesworth v Birmingham, U.S. Supreme Court. 394 U.S. 147 (1969).

    “There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional Rights.” Snerer v Cullen 481 F. 946.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.