Big Pharma In Crisis As Triple-Jabbed Revealed To Be 391% More Likely To Catch COVID

Fact checked
Big pharma covid vaccine boosters

It has taken a couple of years, but Big Pharma Covid-19 vaccines have finally been exposed as the scam that they always were.

Official data published by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) confirms COVID-19 vaccine efficacy has fallen through the floor, especially among those who submitted to two doses plus a booster.

According to the data, the vaccine’s effectiveness in protecting against infection has fallen to a point where you are more likely to catch a COVID-19 infection than you’re likely to be protected by the vaccine. This is referred to as negative efficacy.

The effectiveness of the vaccine against infection has fallen to -391% among triple-jabbed people in their 60s.

Effectiveness came in at between -298% and -324% among those aged 30 to 59.

That means if you’re in your 60s, you’re almost four times as likely to become infected than an unvaccinated person of the same age. WesternStandard report:

Other age demographics have also suffered a statistically significant drop in vaccine effectiveness with figures showing all triple-vaccinated adults are now between three and five times more likely to be infected with COVID-19 than unvaccinated adults.

Graph 1 below shows the real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness — in terms of infection — among the triple-vaccinated population by age and week number in England between January 3 and March 27, 2022. The calculations were made using Pfizer’s own vaccine efficacy formula based on the case rate numbers (provided in Graph 3 further below).

The following graph (Graph 2) indicates the total number of COVID-19 cases by vaccination status in England.

The data is separated by age, group, and by week and has been taken directly from the Weeks 5, 9 and 13 UKHSA Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance reports.

Graph 2 indicates infection rates for the vaccinated significantly outnumber those for the unvaccinated. Among all age groups who are triple-vaccinated, infections have been highest since the beginning of 2022.

Paradoxically, the probability of the 30–59 triple-vaccinated age groups getting infected with COVID-19 was significantly higher than for those aged 70 and up.

The data indicates people who have been triple-vaccinated for Covid-19 are substantially more likely to be infected with coronavirus than unvaccinated people.

Graph 3 below shows the per-100,000 case rate by vaccination status for the same January to March 27, 2022, period.

Case numbers here are greatest among the triple-vaccinated and far outnumber those of the unvaccinated in all age demographics.

The UKHSA reports comparing infection rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations to determine the efficacy of a vaccine isn’t necessarily as simple as it looks.

“Comparing case rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated populations should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection,” the UKHSA said

“Vaccine effectiveness has been formally estimated from a number of different sources and is summarized on pages four to 15 in this report.”

The UKHSA said case rates in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are non-adjusted crude rates and do not take into account underlying statistical biases in the data and that there are likely to be systematic differences between the two population groups. For example:

• Testing behaviour is likely to be different between people with different vaccination status, resulting in differences in the chances of being identified as a case.
• Many of those who were at the head of the queue for vaccination are those at higher risk from COVID-19 due to their age, their occupation, their family circumstances, or because of underlying health issues.
• People who are fully vaccinated and people who are unvaccinated may behave differently, particularly with regard to social interactions and therefore may have differing levels of exposure to COVID-19.
• People who have never been vaccinated are more likely to have caught COVID-19 in the weeks or months before the period of the cases covered in the report. This gives them some natural immunity to the virus which may have contributed to a lower case rate in the past few weeks.

A large prospective study of almost 4,000 people by Pfizer in 2021 on the effectiveness of its vaccine found that a double-dose was 91% effective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, while a single-dose was 81% effective.

Their study said that those who became infected — partially or fully vaccinated individuals — had a lower level of viral RNA, a lower risk of developing febrile symptoms, and a reduced duration of illness compared with unvaccinated individuals.

A study released by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in September 2021 reported that Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine was 71% effective at preventing hospitalization from the virus, while Pfizer’s and Moderna’s two-dose vaccines provided 88% and 93% protection, respectively.

Waning immunity over time, new variants of the virus, and specific medical conditions may affect how the vaccines work — infections in fully vaccinated people has become a stark reality.

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Email: baxter@thepeoplesvoice.tv
Baxter Dmitry

10 Comments

  1. Strange that “disinformation” turns out to be truth and “truth” turns out to be disinformation

    • Might be the reason they are so scared of Musk now–Musk wants free speech–enjoy the ride.

      • It’s not likely that he didn’t know perfectly well that him buying twitter isn’t goung to suddenly change the I ternet laws. And actually if anything his outspoken defiance will just cause MORE censorship, not lrssx.

        • I also think censorship may get worse but at least somebody is fighting back–what is Musk hidden motives? Does he have any? I don’t know but I do know that they are exposing themselves even more and Musk is helping them do that and with Truth Social coming on line that is just another form of attack against them. Not many people I know that has the money to take these people on

  2. Even mainstream is saying the clots are in the eyes now and people are going blind from them

    • Yes I know of one person who had his eye removed, BUT they claimed that it was a hitherto totally unknown infection that happened just days after his jab. And another who is legally blind in one eye now which they said is just one of things. Nothing to do with anything.

  3. Pfizer and Moderna as convicted CRIMINALS with records for frauds as long as your arm Repeat offenders who obviously have no regard for the law are unlikely to blhqve any credibility to any people of any integrity regarding any of their claims. Common sense. The same people consorting with them are the exact same people who will act as if Theure far too good to even be seen in public with a convicted criminal. That’s, hypocrisy in action And their consorting blatantly with the world’s most heavy frauds in history is a disgrace.

    • Most heavily fined Pfizer are But both are multiple criminal convictions, over and over for years and years consistent criminal frauds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.