Connecticut Judge Overturns Election Because of Ballot Stuffing Fraud, Sets Precedent

A judge in Connecticut has overturned the results of an election in Bridgeport, ordering a new election be held after bombshell video evidence of election fraud was found.

“The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary,” Superior Court Judge William Clark wrote in his ruling, adding that the videos “are shocking to the court and should be shocking to all the parties.”

This is stunning news because it sets a precedent for future election fraud cases. Judges across the country now have a case to go off of when ruling in future mail-in ballot fraud cases.

The situation is documented by a report at the Gateway Pundit, which cited the decision by Superior Court Judge William Clark to order a new election.

The report explained, “The Gateway Pundit reported in September that mayoral candidate John Gomes’ campaign released a damning video showing evidence of election fraud in the Bridgeport Democratic primary. The video has prompted an investigation by the Bridgeport Police Department for ‘possible misconduct.'”

The video revealed a woman, Wanda Geter-Patacky, a vocal supporter of incumbent Mayor Joe Ganim, apparently dropping off stacks of absentee ballots ahead of the Sept. 12 primary.

TRENDING: Matthew Perry Vowed To Expose Hollywood Pedophile Ring Before He Was Found Dead

Gomes charged, “Video surveillance proving that the mayoral election was unequivocally stolen through corruption within city hall by tampering with absentee ballots.”

The issue is the same that raised numerous complaints during the 2020 presidential election, in which Joe Biden purportedly got 81 million votes – more than any presidential candidate ever and far more than the leftist but popular Barack Obama got during his elections.

There were a multitude of concerns about ballot harvesting, ballot box stuffing and worse. But the issue remained fogged because many jurisdictions actually changed their voting procedures and processes because of COVID-19, leaving the accountability for such behavior uncertain.

What is certain about the undue influences on the 2020 president was that Mark Zuckerberg handed out some $400-plus million that was used by the election officials often to recruit voters from Democrat districts in an agenda to help Joe Biden. That actually prompted many jurisdictions to ban the use of such outside money in that manner.

Further, the FBI decided to interfere in the election results by telling media and other corporations to suppress what turned out to be accurate reporting, based on evidence found in a laptop computer abandoned by Hunter Biden at a repair shop, about the scandals in which the Biden family was involved.

The FBI suggested it all was “Russian disinformation” even though the bureau at the time knew it was accurate reporting. A subsequent polling revealed that undue influence almost certainly took the election victory away from President Trump.

Those actions now are under investigation by the House, where one top investigator has determined that there’s no doubt the Biden family was involved in influence peddling while Joe Biden was vice president to Obama.

Gomes said, of the dispute, “This is an undeniable act of voter suppression and a huge civil rights violation. It’s time to restore lasting credibility to our city’s democracy. Once and for ALL. Enough is enough!”

Gomes lost to Ganim in the primary by only 251 votes.

Police confirmed they are “actively investigating.’

The report noted Bridgeport Democratic Registrar of Voters Patricia Howard confessed in court she had failed to follow state law over the handling of mail-in ballots, which requires each absentee ballot to be signed off by the town clerk.

“Judge Clark determined that the allegations of possible malfeasance were serious enough to warrant the overturning of the September 12 primary results,” the report said.

“The volume of ballots so mishandled is such that it calls the result of the primary election into serious doubt and leaves the court unable to determine the legitimate result of the primary,” the judge said.