Disney has revealed that the sequel to “Frozen” will feature a lesbian activist Princess in response to bullying from left-wing LGBT lobbyists.
After the #GiveElsaAGirlfriend hashtag went viral recently, Disney was forced to choose between caving into political pressure or face a huge backlash from leftist media.
Thegatewaypundit.com reports: The move would not be unsettling for adults who don’t have children, as an animated film will have no impact on their view of the world, but for parents who have young children that idolize Disney princesses and characters, this move would be one that would create a rift among a major demographic of Disney’s fanbase.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
One of the main and most cogent arguments in opposition to Elsa being a lesbian is the complexity of the topic of sexuality.
This character will force parents to have this conversation with their child, which leftists obviously think is an amazing thing. Most people shouldn’t have to explain sexual attraction, mores, and orientation to their six-year-old.
In 21st Century America, leftists don’t want kids to grow up with any kind of innocence.
Many liberals have argued that the stories of princes kissing unconscious princesses and beasts falling in love with women is just as equatable to a woman and a woman in love in a cartoon film, but as Dr. Jordan Peterson points out, those stories were based on fairytales with well-defined archetypical characters and moral narratives with deeper subtexts driving the narrative. Nothing is superfluous.
As the interviewer asked Peterson in his recent Time Magazine discussion, “Aren’t we allowed to make up new [fairytales]?” Peterson’s simple response says it all: “Not for political reasons.”
The child watching the next “Frozen” film should not have to turn to their parent with a confused look on their face and ask the question, “Why are the two girls kissing?” Not because it’s immoral for two women to kiss and not because love between two women is evil or a bad thing – it’s obviously the opposite – but there is a political message behind this and it’s inappropriate. Politics make a simple movie no longer a simple movie.
Sean Adl-Tabatabai
I say start a boycott…….I for one would never take my kids (or myself) to see that film
Great to see you’re triggered.
“Not because it’s immoral for two women to kiss and not because love between two women is evil or a bad thing – it’s obviously the opposite”
WHAT?????? Obviously…. the OPPOSITE?????????
It IS immoral, it IS evil and it IS a bad thing. And KIDS and their PARENTS should never be FORCED to except it.
The guy that wrote this should be fired………….
Homosexuality is normal in nature. It is the propagandizing and sickness that libtards do with it that is evil and bad.
How the hell is Homosexuality normal in nature ?……
Exactly! Even native English speakers have forgotten the dictionary definition of “SODOMY”: unnatural sexual relations of men with men, women with women, and humans with animals. “Sodomy” is the correct English word covering all those depravities, and we should use it, rejecting the cutesy word “gay” or scientific-sounding “homosexual”.
Agreed!
And Princess Lesbos seduced the wicked witch and fed her with her own poisoned Apple and every one lived happily ever after .
It doesn’t not say anything in the Bible about girl on girl. So game on!
Romans 1: 24-27 (King James Version)
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
The modern libtard believes in polluting everything with politics. Because the modern liberal is a sore loser and has failed decade after decade to get people to adopt their beliefs, they are now resorting to pushing politics in every form possible. Liberals hate children so they remove the innocent from cartoons and animated movies. Liberals ABHOR youths, so they drown the already confusing and burdensome time with political gunk and acronym groups.
This is very same reason why censorship is on the rise on every platform. For decades, the liberal did their best to blend in and seem to flow with the era they were in. Now they have reached their final infant forms and they going on temper tantrums across the globe. Like many wise men have said, they take down everything they touch and want to bring us down with them. Their only final goal is this: to tear down all good, and elevate all bad until there is nothing left in the middle but mindless apathy and nihilism. Nothing more or less. Everything else is a front.
[TRIGGERED]
>Whines about “lefitsts going on temper tantrums”
>Goes on own temper tantrum
LOL! An autistic libtard idiot. But I do appreciate the reminder that you people are so stupid (no, calling you stupid doesn’t actually mean I’m angry) that you can’t even tell what is or isn’t “right-wing” and what is or isn’t “anger”. So, you clump everything that disagrees with your grade-school mentality as “triggered” and “whatever I said in my post (toddler attempt at shifting)”. Give it up. Your head’s up your ass but you’re making yourself look like one, too.
And P.S: I’m more of an actual liberal than any of you freaks. Now scramble a pre-recorded opinion and throw smiley emojis to make it seem like you’re laughing. 🙂 😀 🙂
Nice to see how many people are offended at the suggestion of an LGBT character in media.
Disney had all this planned long ago, as part of the Illuminati Globalist agenda for the destruction of western civilization. But they conceal it by pretending that they were “forced” into it by “lobbyists”.
Why does Disney have 666 hidden in their logo?