A disturbing new study has revealed that exposure to the spike protein from COVID-19 vaccines can have devastating effects on women’s reproductive and maternal health.
The study, which was conducted by a team of leading medical experts, found that women who have received the experimental mRNA vaccine are at an increased risk of experiencing severe fertility abnormalities, miscarriages, and other serious health complications.
Theepochtimes.com reports: In late January, 2021, just a month after the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines were granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2020, a dramatic change in Google trend searches for “decidual cast” was evident.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
Another surge in interest occurred in mid-June 2021, a month after the Pfizer vaccine was granted an expanded EUA for adolescents ages 12–15 years.
A decidual cast is defined as: “a large, intact piece of tissue that is passed through the vagina in one solid piece. It happens when the thick mucus lining of the uterus, called the decidua, sheds in the near exact shape of a uterine cavity, creating a triangular cast.”
Women began reporting unusual menstrual conditions on social media, including decidual cast shedding (DCS). This prompted several internet-based surveys, one of which was conducted by MyCycleStory.com.
While the literature contains only case reports of DCS, making the true prevalence difficult to measure, the condition is thought to be quite rare. Fewer than 40 cases have been published over the course of 100 years, usually related to ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, or prolonged progesterone use.
However, 292 women reported experiencing DCS during a 7.5 month MyCycleStory study period in 2021.
Even though the absolute number of cases is not that high, this unusually increased incidence over the background rate requires further study to ascertain the cause, and any other potential contributors related to the pandemic.
Studies Observe an Impact on Women’s Menstrual Cycle
In the United States Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), over 11,000 people self-reported a menstrual-related issue to the system following COVID-19 vaccination by April 2022. Events included heavy bleeding, irregular or delayed menstruation, oligomenorrhea, and amenorrhea.
Likewise, the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) yellow card surveillance scheme received 51,695 reports of menstrual disorders, including heavier or delayed periods, and unexpected bleeding, after the COVID-19 vaccine.
Findings from these databases suggested the possibility of negative impacts in menstrual cycles following COVID-19 vaccination. The relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual cycle has been evaluated in several peer-reviewed studies.
In a large prospective cohort study conducted by Harvard, the Apple Women’s Health study, cycle length was manually tracked by 9,682 vaccinated and unvaccinated women who contributed 128,094 menstrual cycles, most of whom were vaccinated (88 percent) with Pfizer (55 percent) or Moderna (37 percent). Both cycle length and menses length were tracked prospectively to capture baseline, vaccination, and follow-up measures.
This study found that mean cycle length did increase following vaccination, particularly for women who received their vaccine during the first two weeks of the cycle, during the follicular phase.
Following the first dose in the follicular phase, the cycle length increased by 0.97 days, and following the second dose by 1.43 days. The cycle remained longer for one to two months after vaccination then returned to baseline.
Women who were vaccinated during the luteal phase tended to have a shorter cycle (-0.97 days).
Another prospective United States cohort study of nearly 4,000 women ages 18 to 45 years evaluated those with normal cycle lengths for three consecutive cycles before the first vaccine dose and three post-vaccine cycles (cycles 4, 5, and 6). Those who were unvaccinated were evaluated over six cycles during a similar time period.
The investigators computed within-individual changes in cycle length and menses length for cycles 1–3 and 4–6 then used mixed-effects models to compare differences in cycle and menses length between the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts.
The investigators found a mean 0.91 day increase in mean cycle length for women receiving the mRNA vaccine during their second vaccine cycle.
More vaccine recipients had a cycle length change of at least 8 days than unvaccinated (6.5 percent vs 4.6 percent, p=0.017). The longer vaccine cycles seemed to be concentrated among the 358 individuals who received both doses within a single cycle.
In this subgroup of vaccinated women, the unadjusted mean cycle length increase was 2.38 days and a substantially larger proportion (10.6 percent) had an increased cycle length of at least 8 days compared with the unvaccinated cohort (4.3 percent, P<.001).
The authors found no difference in menses length between cohorts.
A smaller Israel study among 219 women regularly tracking cycles also found changes in menstruation reported by almost 40 percent of vaccinated women. Parity (number of pregnancies) and medication use seemed to be risk factors for menstrual irregularities.
Half of those suffering from irregular bleeding were multiparous versus 31.5 percent multiparity among women with no irregular bleeding. Presence of comorbidities was also higher among women reporting irregular bleeding.
Interestingly, women reporting regular medication use were less likely to report irregular bleeding.
Another study included both a prospective cohort of 79 women and a retrospective cohort of 1273 women.
The study did also find a cycle length increase (delay to the next period) in women cycling spontaneously, suggesting that COVID-19 vaccination can lengthen the menstrual cycle.
However, no such change was observed among those using contraception, suggesting that this effect of COVID-19 vaccination may be mediated by ovarian hormones.
While several studies (references 9–14) have suggested that COVID-19 infection can cause changes in cycle length, the Nurses’ Health Study did not detect such an association following COVID-19 infection.
In this study, COVID-19 vaccination was associated with cycle length in the short term (within 6 months of vaccination), particularly among women with short, long, or irregular cycles prior to vaccination. Changes in cycle length were detected for both mRNA and adenovirus-vectored vaccines.
A plausible connection between COVID-19 vaccination–both mRNA and adenovirus-vectored vaccines–and increased cycle length appears reasonable. The effect seems most pronounced among women who have already had a child and who receive both doses within a single cycle, which is consistent with the survey study from Israel.
VAERS Data Suggests Increased Risks of Menstruation and Pregnancy Irregularities
A preprint study of adverse events (AE) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) compared the ratio of AEs due to COVID-19 vaccines to influenza vaccines. Thorp and colleagues gathered data on pregnancy and menstruation irregularities reported to VAERS between Jan. 1, 1998 to June 30, 2022.
The reporting ratio for AEs related to COVID-19 vaccines compared to influenza vaccines were at least double (and statistically significant at p<0.05) for the following:
- menstrual abnormality (MA), miscarriage(M), fetal malformation (FM), fetal cardiac disorders (FCD), fetal growth abnormalities (FGA), fetal abnormal surveillance (FAS), fetal death/stillbirth (FS) and low amniotic fluid (LAF), which are listed In the below graph.A value greater than 1 implied that AE are reported more frequently with COVID-19 vaccine compared to influenza vaccines.
- fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal cystic hygroma, fetal arrhythmia, fetal cardiac arrest, fetal vascular mal-perfusion, fetal placental thrombosis, which are not included in the Figure but also significantly increased.
It should be noted that for any VAERS study, this is a passive reporting system which relies on physician reporting and may not reflect the true rate for the AE. Detection of AEs may vary significantly depending on public awareness of the AE, thus sensitivity may be as low as 1% percent of all AEs or 67 percent. Self-reports by patients are not necessarily confirmed by a physician diagnosis. The VAERS database is appropriate for hypothesis-generation, but population-based studies are needed to understand true incidence and causation.
Canadian Study Observed Increased Risks of Severe Adverse Events During Pregnancy
A Canadian prospective observational cohort study of COVID-19 vaccines, published in Lancet Infectious Disease pregnancy, evaluated the frequency of significant health events among 5625 pregnant / vaccinated, compared with 339 pregnant / unvaccinated and 185 735 nonpregnant / vaccinated controls, resulting a total of 191,360 women ages 15–49 years included.
The data were collected by survey with follow-up phone calls to those reporting any medically attended event.
The pregnant vaccinated females had a 4.4-fold (95 percent CI 2.4-8.3) increased risk of a severe health event after dose two of Moderna compared to pregnant unvaccinated females; this association was not seen for those vaccinated with Pfizer.
The dose of Moderna vaccine (100mcg) is more than 3 fold that of Pfizer (30mcg) in adults, which may well explain the different results among vaccine brands.
Miscarriage or stillbirth was the most frequently reported adverse pregnancy outcome. Both miscarriage and stillbirth describe pregnancy loss, but they differ according to when the loss occurs. In the United States, a miscarriage is usually defined as loss of a baby before the 20th week of pregnancy, and a stillbirth is loss of a baby at or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
It was reported at similar rates between control (2.1 percent of 339) and vaccinated groups within seven days after dose one of any mRNA vaccine (1.5 percent of 5,597).
Other rare adverse pregnancy outcomes such as vaginal bleeding, abnormal fetal heart rate, and reduced fetal movement were increased slightly within seven days following any mRNA vaccination compared to control.
There were an additional individuals who reported experiencing miscarriage or stillbirth between the first COVID-19 vaccine dose and completion of the second (dose two) survey (up to 10 days after dose two), however the precise timing of these events relative to vaccination was not known.
Impact on Fertility
The impact of vaccination and infection on ovarian function and fertility is a heavy topic. The key findings from a number of peer-reviewed publications and preprints has been summarized here.
Reduced Total Fertility Rate (TFR)
There is a population-wide change in fertility after vaccination campaigns. In a new preprint, the total fertility rate (TFR) in Sweden and Germany was trended over time, from early in the pandemic through 2022.
Many countries noticed a fertility decline early in the pandemic, but Germany and Sweden were largely unaffected. These countries, however, recently experienced a reduction in the TFR.
The seasonally-adjusted TFR in Germany declined 14 percent from 1.5-1.6 in 2021 to 1.3-1.4 in early 2022. A similar trend was seen in Sweden, with a 10 percent decline from 1.7 to 1.5-1.6.
The authors note that the sharp declines in TFR align with the onset of vaccination campaigns precisely nine months prior. The authors speculate that concerns about vaccine safety during conception and pregnancy might have caused women to hold off on starting their family until after vaccination.
Further population-based longitudinal research is necessary to detect any slight but significant effects of vaccination on fertility.
Pregnancy Rates
A systematic review and meta-analysis has evaluated the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility
In the systematic review, 29 studies conducted in Israel, United States, Russia, China, Italy, North America, and Turkey were included.
The pregnancy rates were observed to decline in the vaccinated group by 15 percent for biochemical pregnancy rate and by 4.3 percent for clinical pregnancy rate, in a comparison to the unvaccinated group.
It is reported that both declines did not reach a statistical difference among vaccinated and not vaccinated groups. However, a clinical meaningful decline is not necessarily to be statistically significant. And whether to achieve a statistical difference or not may be confounded by the power of studies.
Furthermore, meta-analyses were performed for pre- and post-vaccination sperm progressive motility (44 percent versus 43 percent, p = 0.07).
Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH)
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) has been used as a marker to assess ovarian function in women and it impacts fertility. It gives an estimate of ovarian reserve–how many eggs are remaining in the ovaries. Older women normally have lower levels than younger women.
In a prospective study conducted in Israel among 129 women who received two mRNA vaccines, the change in AMH was assessed via baseline and 90-day measurements, pre- and post-vaccination.
In this study, no change was detected in AMH levels pre- vs post-vaccination (5.3 vs 5.3 µg/l, respectively).
The authors concluded that while this study was limited to a three-month followup after the first vaccination, there did not appear to be any effect of mRNA vaccination on ovarian function.
Another similar but smaller Israeli prospective study among 31 women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment found that AMH remained stable pre- and post-mRNA vaccination.
There are limitations of the AMH studies. First, there is no control group and only self control was used.
Second, serum AMF levels are known to be affected by multiple factors including obesity, vitamin D levels, oral contraceptive therapies, genes (BRCA mutations contributing to breast and ovarian cancers), chemotherapy, common ovulatory disorders (polycystic ovary syndrome, PCOS), and history of ovarian surgery. Any potential changes in common confounding factors for serum AMF levels (body weight, contraceptives, vitamin D levels) in these subjects should be analyzed and reported.
In a retrospective study including 200 women undergoing IVF, no difference in fertility outcomes was detected, including oocyte retrieval, fertilization and pregnancy rates, and embryo quality.
Although this study found similar pregnancy rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated (32.8 percent and 33.1 percent, respectively), it would have required a much larger sample size to detect a small but meaningful difference.
A sample of at least 985 participants would be needed to detect a smaller 5 percent difference in pregnancy rates. In other words, this study was underpowered to detect a meaningful difference of reduction in pregnancy rates.
In another retrospective cohort study of 222 vaccinated and 983 unvaccinated women who underwent ovarian hyperstimulation, no effect of vaccination was found for the primary outcome, fertilization rate, nor any of the secondary outcomes, including eggs retrieved, mature oocytes retrieved, mature oocyte ratio, blastulation rate, or euploid rate.
For 214 vaccinated and 733 unvaccinated women undergoing frozen-thawed euploid transfer, the adjusted analysis found no significant association for vaccination and the primary outcome, clinical pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.79, 95 percent CI 0.54-1.16), nor any of the secondary outcomes: pregnancy (aOR 0.88, 95 percent CI 0.58-1.33), ongoing pregnancy (aOR 0.90, 95 percent CI 0.61-1.31), biochemical pregnancy loss (aOR 1.21, 95 percent CI 0.69-2.14), or clinical pregnancy loss (aOR 1.02, 95 percent CI 0.51-2.06).
However, these confidence intervals are large and the sample size insufficient to rule out a small but clinically meaningful difference in outcomes.
A small cohort study of 32 individuals (9 recovered SARS-CoV-2 positive, 9 vaccinated, 14 uninfected/unvaccinated) found no differences in follicular function and oocyte quality.
Together, these studies suggest that any effect of either infection or vaccination on fertility will be difficult to detect unless studies are designed with sufficient statistical power geared to expected changes in primary and secondary endpoints.
A decrease of 0.3 percent in the vaccinated group is 30 fewer pregnancies per 10,000 women, thus any study designed to detect a difference this slight would need to enroll 770,000 women.
Some might suggest powering phase III clinical trials to detect fertility impact is impractical, but certainly intentional post-marketing surveillance when vaccine uptake is in the millions is possible.
Mechanism of Action of AEs in Reproductive Health
A number of molecular mechanism of actions have been discussed which may contribute to the AEs observed in women.
First, immune activation following exposure to spike protein after vaccination might trigger an abnormal innate immune response, activate inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory genes.
Second, the spike protein induced local and systemic inflammation might impact the signaling between the brain and ovaries (the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal or HPA axis), resulting in hormone imbalances, prolongation of follicular recruitment during the early part of the cycle, and lengthening the cycle.
On the other hand, vaccination during the luteal phase may suppress growth of the endometrial lining and affect endometrial stability, thus shortening the cycle.
Third, ovarian inflammation may also be caused by lipid nanoparticles (LNP) effects on hormones, an autoimmune reaction with anti-syncytin antibodies at the endometrium, or inflammatory processes triggered by the spike protein either from the vaccine or infection.
Fourth, abnormal bleeding can be caused by abnormal local clotting in the endometrium during the period.
A large body of evidence has shown that the spike protein can trigger the clotting cascade via inducing endothelial disruption, inflammation of endothelial cells, massively released activated vWF, overactivating platelet, fibrous network from neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), as well as increasing angiotensin II level, activating Toll-like receptor 4, all adding up to initiate blood clotting cascades.
Meanwhile, spike protein disrupts the clot dissolving mechanisms through inducing resistance to fibrinolysis, competitive binding to heparan sulfate, as well as forming an amyloid-like substance.
Based on the evidences of spike protein’s domino-like activities related to abnormal blood clotting, the potential role of spike protein originating from SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 vaccine in the abnormal bleeding of vaccinated women is likely to contribute to the surge of increased DCS and menstrual disorders during COVID pandemic, amongst other dysregulated immune and hormone mediated pathologies.
Impact on Lactation: Antibodies Detected in Milk and Symptoms Reported
A prospective cohort study included 50 lactating women who received mRNA vaccines with both blood and milk samples prior to their first vaccination dose, immediately prior to dose two, and four to ten weeks after their second dose.
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies were measured in each sample, and blood samples were collected from a subset of infants whose mothers were vaccinated while lactating.
After vaccination, levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM significantly increased in maternal plasma and there was significant transfer of IgA and IgG antibodies to milk.
Self-reported symptoms (fever, chills, headache, joint pain, muscle aches or body aches, and fatigue or tiredness) were reported by significantly more participants after the 2nd dose than after the 1st dose.
Two mothers reported slightly less milk production in the first 24-72 hours after vaccine doses.
Twelve percent of infants were reported with at least one symptom after the 1st maternal vaccine dose, which are primarily gastrointestinal symptoms and sleep changes.
The study lacked an unvaccinated control and these changes in infant behaviors are common; future studies should evaluate these reports.
The study also collected symptoms following vaccination and noted that more vaccine-related side effects may be experienced by those receiving Moderna compared to Pfizer, which should be again attributed to the higher dose of Moderna.
Natural Immunity Impact on Lactation
Finally, a study of mothers recently recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection evaluated both antibodies and T cells in breastmilk. Because only about one in four women elect to be vaccinated during pregnancy, the ability of the mother to confer passive immunity to her infant through breast milk is an important question to assess.
In this small study of 30 lactating women, both antibody and T cell parameters were evaluated in milk samples collected at 12 timepoints over the course of a month.
A second set of samples were donated four months after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test to test durability of the immune markers.
The study confirms that women recently infected with SARS-CoV-2 have antibodies in their milk which can neutralize the spike complex. The milk is also enriched with mucosal memory T cells.
This study may be the first to demonstrate that breast milk from mothers who have recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection contains long-lasting IgA and IgG antibody responses and that breastmilk can provide passive protection to the infant via mucosal-homing, effector-memory T cells which can seed the infant gastrointestinal tract.
Summary of Key Observations
Based on the available data collected from clinical studies, vaccine safety databases or surveys, a summary of key observations include:
- Concerns about the negative impacts of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle have been validated by peer-reviewed research.
- The cycle length appears to increase following both mRNA and adenovirus-vectored vaccination, particularly for those women who received both doses within a single cycle (21-28 day interval), and those who were vaccinated during the follicular phase.
- VAERS data suggests increased risks of menstruation and pregnancy irregularities. A Canadian study also observed increased risks of severe adverse events during pregnancy associated with the Moderna vaccine.
- Sharp decline of total fertility rates were reported in Germany and Sweden in 2022. A 15 percent decline in the biochemical pregnancy rate and a 4.3 percent decline in the clinical pregnancy rate were reported, though AMU studies did not detect any meaningful change.
- Spike protein induced inflammation, immune disorders, and hormone mediated mechanisms of action as well as abnormal clotting cascades and overactivation have been correlated to these clinical adverse events.
- COVID vaccine induced antibodies have been detected in milk, as well as symptoms among mothers and infants post vaccination are reported.
- The effect has been observed across spike protein-based COVID-19 vaccines regardless of vaccine type. The higher dose mRNA vaccine (Moderna) is associated with a higher likelihood of these events than the lower dose mRNA vaccine (Pfizer).
These findings strongly suggest that more rapid and intentional post-marketing surveillance is necessary to detect impacts of vaccination on menstrual, pregnancy, and lactation events.
The CDC continues to recommend vaccination and boosters for all individuals over 5 years of age despite a lack of evidence regarding an incremental reduction in serious COVID-19 illness among those younger than 40 years of age.
To address vaccine hesitancy, public health officials and regulatory agencies must demonstrate that individual concerns are addressed and that clinical trials are designed to detect rare adverse events in otherwise healthy, young individuals prior to issuing broad recommendations.
A phased trial rollout which prioritizes enrollment of higher risk individuals and follows them for clinically important endpoints, such as hospitalization and death, would allow rapid deployment of lifesaving vaccines while minimizing harm to those at low risk of serious illness.
Sean Adl-Tabatabai
I was warning my nieces, sister, that this was what the vaccine was all about, back in 2020. How did I know this? because I was listening to the most high. He showed me this. Why? because I asked to know.
Hahahaha
You talmudics wont be laughing soon. He also showed me visions of people like you, and what will happen to you.
Hahahaha OMG You really are something else.
Josey Your so deceived. By yourself.
Shhh, it’s the ZioNazis anti-Christs like Joe Biden behind the Covid 19 “vaccination” death jab scam.
Give it a rest. It came from the Imperial. College via Neil Ferguson a d you know it
Start afresh with Moses on the Mountain.
Your really a lost soul Uneducated delusional dim-witted and brain damaged. Its not your fault but it’s your choices.
Try again, and get an “A” this time instead of an “E”.
Moses, was a fraud. So bad was his sales pitch that he had to trek up to the mountain a second time, and try another angle to get his rabbles attention.
Who is Neil Ferguson?
Don’t want Covid, it was with a high probability made in a Chinese laboratory as a binary weapon.
I got both initial shots, and just received the 2nd booster. Never had Covid, never want to catch it.
Yu still alive?
Comes down to who do you trust most? The American military and its high command, or the Chinese high command.
Yes, alive with 4 shots and no sign of Covid in my system.
Binary weapons are nasty, and the first part A lays idle, waiting for part B.
Wise up, and Stop.
The military has given me a hundred vaccinations, this is not much different.
Okay.
Most vets, will attest to the same. The Defense Department has to have warfighters ready 24/7, without them the top brass has nothing.
Once Covid was clearly a Chinese issue, that got inside the USA and aboard national capital assets such as aircraft carriers. All bases got locked down and testing was mandated for all. When the vaccinations came out, the warfighters got the first doses. And that is something to look at, as the active duty and contractors on each branch bases, received their vaccinations long before civilians. Guess is, the intelligence from inside the Wuhan facility had already allowed a means for rapid neutralization to take place. All those US people associated with the Wuhan facility, cleary worked as access agents of the first order for the betterment of the US nation.
Covid is Fiction, the “Vaccine” is not.
The Vaccine is designed as a population reducer.
As we may agree the Covid virus was man made, then who released it as a population reducer?
The only Covid is in China transported there courtesy of the White House’s laboratories. It’s part of the long-running biological attacks on countries.
Maybe you are right. We don’t ever really know the truth. But the Chinese are not to be trusted, as they intentionally refused to allow investigators for all nations to help locate the source of the virus. This leaves Beijing as complicit in a cover up. Beijing is lucky Trump was the President, and not me. I would have ordered then US Air Force and Navy to use conventional weapons and saturation bomb the sh*t out of Wuhan, and all locations tied to its existence.
Your moment of Delirium here?
Why delerium? Maybe as i mentioned the lack of transparency specific to Beijing’s heavy handed political infrastructure?
In a nation of 1.5 billion, have such a small cabal making too many decisions – for successive leadership is about the worst means for administration and governance.
Can you see Your Biden governing 1.5 billion people?
Biden, spent most of his career on the tax payers dollars – much like XI who spent most of his life sucking off the peoples efforts. That’s not real work and its detached and driven by other peoples idealisms. In Bidens case, he was elected primarily due to the only other candidate for voters, many who had been disaffected by Trump four year run. Neither of these men, are who I would have ever voted for, for elected political representation. Xi cant be trusted, Biden too geriatric to trust.
Delerium over massive bombardment of the Chinese, who refused to close their airports and sent Covid to most all nations?
Another Dumb American.
Dumb American, Huh? A direct message is conveyed when sending a message to Beijing to change now, while the munitions are conventional.
Where are you from Rusty. You sound unAmerican to me.
“Where are you from Rusty. You sound unAmerican to me”
You and “Rusty” should probably give a shout out across the floor.
You may find he’s sat at a terminal near you, just getting in his troll shift before he goes home to his apartment on 1st Zhernovskaya Street.
You track IP addresses, through an aliased machine running Linux, TOR and a VPN, doubtful?
You are making a specious assumption that everything you “know” is correct.
Sure, could be wrong. Its the same group from Manchuria – now the Peoples Liberation Army – that the Japanese experimented on. So don’t think the virus factory today was the benefit of the Japanese research left behind. Then there is the US government invested into the Wuhan lab. Clearly the US intelligence community has a vested interest in knowing the intentions behind Beijing’s many classified biological weapons development programs.
When Covid first was allowed by the Chinese to leave on 10,000 aircraft to all its biggest competitors, it was the modus operandi many needed to understand that the Chinese knew they had a big problem, and would blur the record as best they could by getting the entire world sick, then doing nothing in terms of a multi nation (leading nations) investigation, and saying nothing publicly but carefully crafted disinformation. The Chinese did put out the competing theory, a campaign that placed blame on the US sending clandestine operatives into Wuhan, and releasing the virus.
Maybe you think that is a more valid explanation?
It is not clear to me what you are trying to explain better.
What about all the money that the Pentagon invested in several bioweapon labs in the Ukraine before Russia got tired of their nationals being genocided in the Dombas by the Azov battalion Nazis?
The world knows, if the USA is to use bioweapons on anyone, far from justified it’s going to be the Mexicans right next door. Why would the USA place high technology bioweapons labs, in remote and far away Ukraine.
Why would America need to use bioweapons on Mexico?
They put the bioweapons in the Ukraine because they wanted to design them to differentiate between ethic Russians and ethnic Ukrainians.
If you remove nuclear armed ICBM’s, and remove them from the equation – the biggest threats arrive from across the border. The USA has the Pacific and Atlantic oceans to prevent any invasion from offshore. This leaves Canada, Caribbean, Cuba, and Mexico. Beyond Mexico is Central and South America. Currently the carries 70 million foreigners, with the vast majority of them from Latin America – and those illegal. If looking South, there about 650 million across the border.
.
Now the fact is, since antiquities most all nations collapse from within. In this case, the USA has for 40 years has been allowed per piss pour policy to offshore all manufacturing and production which eviscerated the middle class. That massive bunder has also been amplified by the unwise mindset that reuniting families that arrive through all means .
.
Returning to the the unfortunate fact of 70 million people who are unwanted and unneeded by the the legitimate 270 million citizens, these citizens in mass are unware there is no other nation-state that has ever existed when forced to economically carry that many outsiders. As the nation is in decline (buttressed by unjust spending) the national debt is nearly $32 trillion. Then there is the nations unfunded liabilities which is another $173 trillion, and nobody talk about this as their attention is redirected. No matter had you stack it, that is $200 trillion, in the hole.
.
The USA is a backrupted nation. Its carrying over 70 million foreigners ( more than a quarter of the entire residents) and its distribution of wealth, is far beyond the historical norm of the Pareto Principle, otherwise known as the 80/20 Rule. Would wager the wealth to non-wealth tipping line is much closer to the 90/10 ratio with 90% of the people having just a paltry 10% of the nations wealth.
.
So you ask why would the USA needs its stockpiles of biological weapons against Mexico? The United States – Mexico border is the gateway for most all foreigners. In this case would you advise against the risk of 650 million unwanted crossing into the USA, when its own citizens have so little.
ICBMs would never be needed for America to attack Mexico, regardless of the type of warhead.
List of North, Central and South American Countries
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Bermuda
Bolivia
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Cuba
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Grenada
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Kitts and Nevis
Lucia
Vincent and The Grenadines
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela
What about them?
Exactly, excellent question. So let me ask you this.
How often do they think of you and me? Never.
Countries don’t think about anything in unison.
Do you have no value for the United Nations as an instrument for collaboration, sharing, and unions of consensus.
The United Nations has the highest negative value “as an instrument for collaboration, sharing, and unions of consensus.”
If the United Nations supplies only negative values, why don’t its 200 members begin to defect and leave the organization?
Because it gives them a perfect opportunity to steal whatever they want and blame it on someone else.
Today, the thought specific to Canada, Mexico, and the rest of the Caribbean, Central, and South America is tied to some form of trade. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which was enacted in 1994, that was 30 years ago. 30 years ago, the US population was only 262 million people. Today, its over 333 million – that’s nearly 75 million additional mouths to feed, consume limited fresh water, bodies to house, gasoline consumed/polluting, and both feces and urine to clean, process, and remove. Fact is the USA was long ago saturated with people and the manifold cascade of the nation has been taking place ever since the population was 100 million people – that was in year 1914.
.
Don’t think the current piss poor policies are sustainable, or that the governments never change direction. Change has been happening to failed nation-states since long before the antiquities. In 50 years, 100, or 250 years the USA may act to protect the environment and resources it requires to thrive. Not if, but when that threshold is crossed – it may become crystal clear that the entirety of North, Central, and South America must come under one centralized political operation. Don’t be naive and believe that changes don’t happen, as when they do – they happen fast.
If the USA is saturated, what do you call Chine with 10% more landmass and 3 times the population?
China, is not only saturated with too many bodies, its straddled with the inability to supply any semblance of Western equality. Maybe we don’t live long enough to witness it ourselves, but China is a mismatch. Beijing has conquered many once free peoples and is primed for political splintering. It would best serve the West to have China broken up form over 20 providences, into more than 25 new sovereign nations. Each of these 25 nations would have their own elected governments, their own set of individual rights, and the ability to prosper from the ripe fruits of their labor and efforts. Only one hurdle remains for making that happen. A miscalculation by Xi, will be exploit by the West, may even led to conventional belligerence. In the end, Xi will be forced to step down, if not tried for crimes. The Communist party and Ministry of State Security will be disbanded, and Beijing will be mandated to never again be the seat of political, economic, defensive, cultural, and social power. As that day nears, if you have anything in your possession that is valuable, please let me know. Can arrange for you and your families safe passage out of the East.
Citizens of communist countries don’t have the rights that those of constitutional republics think they have.
Most of the Chinese are willing to enjoy a higher standard of living than many Americans have had stolen from them by their government in conspiracy with globalist oligarchs.
Setting the citizens of China aside, they have far less of a standard of living. For every cup of rice an American has to eat, the Chinese are forced to share that same portion with 4 people. The same applies to a gallon of refined petroleum, fresh water, or a bushel of bananas. These Chinese people that have been accustomed to share much, are not told much of the truth. That truth is they are economically beholden to the Occidentalist. It does not take much for Europe and the USA to place a brake onto the imports of cheap and substandard goods from abroad. In fact, the USA Navy on its own very can shut down over 90% of all exports from China. India doesn’t need anything from China, either do those in Korea, Japan, or Vietnam. China is in a very real sense, practically dead-in-the-water.
You really need to turn off your television.
I don’t have a television at home, BroNuajno. Instead have six rounds of graduate studies – maybe that is what you are struggling with?
On one topic, I once donated nearly 400 books to the local libraries after reading all i could find. Have you ever had a similar interest?
The television your mention, is only at my much smaller vacation home.
Maybe you are just a bit of a comedian? Instead of character assassination, why don’t start to post based on your own knowledge thoughts, beliefs and feelings.
That sounds pretty good, but Eric Blair and Aldous Huxley have nothing to fear.
As a young pupil, I thoroughly enjoyed reading Aldous Huxley as a class project where each classmate took turn reading the book over the course of the class. As for Eric Blair, never read a single one of his books. Am aware that in 2008 George Orwell ranked second among “The 50 greatest British writers since 1945.” If comparing those with neologisms like Blair, Buckminster Fuller supplied a few notable mentions too. Yet, I prefer the Greek, Greeks such as Themistocles, Xenophon, Thucydides, and even the slick ole Italian named Machiavelli had much to say about the best natural leaders.
unctad dot org/topic/trade-analysis/chart-10-may-2021
Wait until it stops moving before you pay any attention to number one and two.
Nice graphics, have seen this before. Problem with the current Chinese economy, they have become a direct threat to the USA and its most important Five Eyes political-economic partners. In fact, China has for decades been a direct threat to the best Asian regional partners. Beijing has hurt all those in the Asian and South East Asian region, and has demonstrated it will not stop – as it is continuously expanding to all points the compass. The Egyptians, Persians, Carthegenians, Mongols, Colonial Empires, Axis powers, and the Warsaw Pact all tried to do the very same. When their expansions failed, they became no more. If one believes the artificially propped up advantages in Exports that China for the time holds, matters. History reminds us that since the antiquities, most all nations fall from within. I posit, Beijing will suffer the same unless they bite off too much to chew in terms of Western military resolve.
When did China murder a million innocent people in Iraq?
Share with me about the conspiracy of globalist oligarchs? Who are these people, and how does that work to their benefit.
Share what with you about the conspiracy of globalist oligarchs?
Yes, please share.
Share, how does a (globalist) oligarch rise to the top of the pile of bodies below him?
Will share for you, only one variable allows for such oligarchs rise – that being the politic system of the nation. Oligarchs manipulate the political system through many means. Some manipulate laws, people, or both. Once one can achieve oligarch status – which frequently happens inside their own homeland vs a foreign government, they can then spread out to many nations where the political-economy supplies easy of manipulation.
You forgot the conspiracy part.
The United States started out as a loose confederation that got communized by the federalists.
China is communized, as is Laos, Vietnam, North Korea, and Cuba. Yet, I get the gist of many being unhappy with the resultant political framework we have today. I think it can be made better, too better its citizens – a nation. I am not well versed in the Federalists who were displaced by the Jeffersonians. I am aware of the results we witness today. Those results can today be measured with some metered accuracy – especially for identifying the poor results. When we should be driving change, that does not happen. Which is an entirely different problem as it strangles the citizens. What good is a government, if
or when it is not helping its citizens?
The more I see of congressionally installed equality, the less actual equality is present.
That is accurate, I tend to agree with your assessment. Congress as it is, is a failed representation of the people. It fails at too many levels and must be reengineered for better representation.
How do the Pacific and Atlantic oceans prevent any invasion from offshore?
There is no competing Navy that can approach the USA coastline, and not risk their invasion flotilla and all on-board to be sunk and drowned. Some may point out that China could muster such a force. Yet, it would be detected through the US over the horizon networks, and would never make past Hawaii. In fact, Chinese are not able to sustain military operations outside of the West Philippine Sea. Even with much and many advantages over Taiwan, I doubt the Chinese could make it across the 100 miles to Taipei. We see today, old strategies of the Russian Navy have failed Moscow. Beijing would be on the receiving end of too many ship killing missiles. Also, it would not take long for the USA to come to the aid of Taiwan, and that would be a lesson for the Chinese in American Primacy. Beijing knows this, the fearless leader Xi, should take his foot off the pedal to metal .
No other country’s navy has the interest in global hegemony that ours does.
In term of hegemony, Huh? The USA does not require alliances, collective security, coalitions, or cartels. What is required is the ability to maneuver when and where policy mandates. It’s primary mission should be effectuating a return to the optimal (domestic and international) population. The more people consuming and wasting finite resources, removes Washington DC’s ability to maneuver.
Where are the Chinese naval vessels off the coast of American like many American ones are off the coast of China and Taiwan?
If Washington D.C. keeps using NATO to attack Russia with the Ukraine, they may find their ability to maneuver stunted by a 800Kt Russian nuclear weapon.
Moscow is all alone, the USA has its own arsenal of strategic systems, as does England, and France – as Washington DC wags them and their tails. Then there is the unformal support from Israel and India of called on the carpet. Then there is both Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan who have the technical means and subsystems ready to assemble their own nuclear weapons on a very short notice. Then there is China. A guess is that Moscow would strike China in an attempt to provoke their retaliatory strikes. Moscow would be now more – much like its current ability to no longer be able to wage war in Ukraine.
Russia and China are long term allies.
Recently, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen carelessly revealed the devastating cost of the Ukraine war.
“It is estimated that more than 20,000 civilians and 100,000 Ukrainian military personnel have died to date,” she said. The comment drew sharp backlash and the E.C. later deleted the comments from video recordings of the address. The censorship was left unexplained and demonstrated the confusion of the purveyors of the approved narrative.
If Von der Leyen’s estimate is true, that is nearly ten times the
number of dead Ukrainian soldiers reported by the Ukrainian government.
The E.C. president’s remark shows that even the strongest backers of
this bloody and unnecessary war can no longer hide the truth: Ukraine is
at risk of losing.
The mainstream media and the Biden administration insist ad nauseam
that Ukraine is winning against Russia. But the facts on the ground do
not fit the narrative and the administration and media know it. The war
hawks know their cynical Ukraine policy has not succeeded in driving
Russia out of Ukraine. Tragically, the Ukrainians are the ones who
suffer the immense cost of this foreign policy failure. Their nation is
ruined for the sake and at the instigation of the globalist American
empire.
As Ukraine loses its grip on heavily defended and important
crossroads around the city of Bakhmut, the Western press has commenced a
campaign to downplay the importance of the loss. Defense Express reports:
“UK Defense Intelligence States [t]hat Bakhmut’s capture becomes
primarily a symbolic, political objective for Russia.” Last week, the Financial Times published an article entitled:
“Hell Just Hell: Ukraine and Russia’s war of attrition over Bakhmut.”
As the subtitle of the piece reads, “Soldiers say fighting in and around
eastern Donetsk city is reminiscent of first world war-style trench
conflict.”
The following information is an indication of the nature of the Ukrainian “victory” over the previous six months.
Ukraine has lost an estimated 20 percent of its territory. At least 22 percent of Ukrainian farmland
is under Russian control. These areas are a large part of the territory
identified in the Minsk II agreement that were to be governed as
autonomous districts. Due to the failure of the Minsk II agreement,
Russia declared its Special Military Operations to free these areas from
the grip of the Ukrainian government. As of today, it appears Russia
has come close to achieving some of its initial goals.
In May 2022, the United Nations Refugee Agency reported that nearly eight million Ukrainians have been internally displaced,
with another six million registered as refugees. That number is likely
to rise even higher this winter. As a result of the recent Russian
missile attacks on the Ukrainian power grid, even more people are
fleeing Ukraine. Europe expects hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian refugees this winter due to the nation’s ruined cities. Kiev Mayor Vitali Klitschko may urge an evacuation of his city due to its failures to provide basic services to its population.
CNN reported a month ago that at least 30 percent of Ukrainian power stations are destroyed. BBC reports that six million Ukrainians are without power. EuroNews recently reported that two-thirds of Kiev is without power. An estimated 80 percent of Kiev is without water. News reports declare that Kiev is getting ready to survive without power, water and heating. Ukraine has evacuated cities that have become uninhabitable without heating or power. The World Health Organization warns millions of lives are “under threat” this winter.
theamericanconservative dot com/is-this-winning/
No other country had two major oceans with Tier One militaries facing them. Each of these coastlines requiring its own dedicated fleets to ensure sea lanes from communications from the Arctic, to Antartica.
Tell us about these
Where is the lawful authorization of American Primacy found?
There are three operative levels of analysis – the individual level – the nation/state level – and the international level of analysis. Please do not make the cross level fallacy with me. If unfamiliar, you have been educated at the wrong institutions. Take some time to read up first.
Fortunately I was never inflicted with institutionalization, so I’m stuck with fascism of the two parties and the occasional libertarian.
A differentiation weapon, Huh? Even if it didn’t work, as long is it killed more Russians than Ukrainians, would you consider it a win-win.
Kindly define differentiation weapon.
Who’s agreeing with you?
If you don’t, you’ll take contention instead.
A very stupid lie
The “Vaccine” is a bio-weapon killing millions.
A really, really stupid lie.
Sure, if you say so.
Oh, you have Funeral Insurance?
You mean you have never received a vaccination in your life?
All who go through the military, for any duration of time have vaccinations by the dozens given to them. I am part engineer, and there is nothing that health economics projections or herd immunity theories which would have convinced me, not to get vaccinated – as a vaccination was eventually available. For those who think gods and nature supplies all remedies, I can only laugh. The theory of gods, is a useless as the the theory of worm holes. There is nothing we have in our lives, that was not firsted engineered by man.
In this case, the Covid-19 theory was likely engineered in a military weapons laboratory to attack the DNA, and one of several ways to stop prevent its infection was engineered to exploit the rDNA.
Only poor countries need vaccines.
Read that 40% of the people are/were susceptible to Covid – due to preexisting conditions. I was one of those 40%.
1 94%of Africans aren’t vaccinated They breed the strongest specimens.
2 farming is an industry done for profits Humans are the most profitable animal. Africans are the best workers, the most fertile.
Pedigrees are always the sickliest from inbreeding. You only want them at 1%.
Theyre the smartest.
“Nothing is what it seems”
Which Africans are you talking about?
Well not the Chinese ones.
There are North Americans’ from Africa, and Africans on nearly every continent. Some are valued superior, to others.
Humans are mammals, and no more profitable than any mammal. The profits come from artificial supply chains, stovepipes, and the percentage of mark-up.
Get real Try selling a cow a house and land car and life insurance.
Cows come with the land, best are grass fed. Cars, my suggestion is you opt for full coverage and uninsured motorists.
I thought the mutt was the smartest, in a dog eat dog world?
They’re often healthiest so appear smarter but pedigrees bred for intelligence are smarter at specific things. Like a cattle dog bred to work compared to a mongrel. You won’t find many farmers buying a mongrel
.You’re right. When i returned from Australia, had a Blue Heeler. Smart as a whip that dog was.
I was thinking of genetics, the mongrel has better overall genetics and it also smart. The African wild dog, or the Dingo are two such packs. But a pointer, chihuahua, retriever, or a pit bull have their special skills as a limited.
So, what is the next generation of vaccinated born women going to face? Will they be infertile and not have to use contraception or have abortions? That would be another setback for the baby killing world.
Too many people as it is, if there was a god he’d want his flock with the low IQ, thinned out.
Can we modify the spike proteins to make women a bit thinner? A hundred pound spinner with a pair of bolt-on’s, that can’t get knocked-up, or never sick enough to not go into the kitchen to make a sandwich would be wonderful.
What a load of crap.
Agree. A whole lot of noise with no signal.
Give the tree a shake and nothing falls out.