If Dems Controlled The Senate They Would Never ‘Ram Through’ SCOTUS Nominee Says Hillary Clinton

Fact checked

If Democrats controlled the US Senate, they wouldn’t be pushing through a Supreme Court nominee before the election, Hillary Clinton told the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg this week.

Clinton was told that Republicans argue if the Democrats were in their position as the majority, they would be advancing a nominee.

Breirbart reports: “Do you believe that to be true?” Goldberg asked. “If they had the power, they’d be trying to ram through their nominee?”

“You know, I don’t believe that,” Clinton responded with a straight face.

“The Democrats were so shocked, and understandably so, at the blatant abuse of the Senate rules and processes when they refused to help President Obama to appoint a replacement for Justice Scalia ten months before the next election,” she said.

“There is within the Democratic caucus in the Senate a real fear that all bets are off, that there is no rule of law, there is no due process, [and] there are no norms or principles governing anything anymore,” Clinton claimed.

She asserted with a straight face that Democrats would think about country before party or ideology.

“I think there would be a very significant discussion within the Democratic caucus as to whether it was good for the country to throw it into another partisan fight, you know, 40 days before such a consequential election,” she said.

Clinton insisted Democrats would not be “demonstrating the lust for power and domination that we have seen from [Senate Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell.”

In 2016, Clinton posted a statement on Twitter calling on the Senate to hold hearings for Judge Merrick Garland and vote on his appointment:

It is the President’s Constitutional responsibility to nominate justices to the Supreme Court, with the advice and consent of the Senate,” she said at the time.

“President Obama has met his responsibility,” she said then.


    • Well, they butchered America’s unborn children by tearing them apart from their mother’s wombs by the millions. They just don’t care about children.

  1. Merrick Garland was another anti-constitution Jewish judge that Democrats tried to ram through the Senate approval process.

    After Democrats under Obama pushed for the grossly incompetent Sonia Sotomayor on the USSC, and the RBG clone Kagan too, there was an overload of oath breaking liars and charlatans on the court.

    Garland was the last straw.

    Shillary’s goal is the same as all other Democrats, to overload the federal court system with activist judges that are oath breaking liars and frauds.

    • Your Constitution has never been legal really. And besides it says ,in your face ,we the people , not we as the representatives of the people ,giving you a wee teenst clue .Research it and you will be surprised how lawyers ha e deceived we the people for centuries .In order to keep us divided ,locally ,nationally and globally .To serve war and division and fuel hatred.

  2. Because of the huge criminal cover ip concerning Scalias circumstances surrounding his death at pedo ranch .Scalia who made it rhat the Supreme Court can decide what religious values are legally acceptable ,can be upheld ,and who together with the rest obviously completely accept Satanism as legally viable .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.