Judge Confirms Clinton-DNC Fraud, Dismisses Case – ‘They Are Above The Law’

Fact checked
A federal judge has gone on record stating that the Democratic National Committee committed fraud during the primaries.

A federal judge has gone on record stating that Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hillary Clinton and the DNC committed fraud during the primary elections, before throwing the case out of court because the fraudsters are above the law.

DNC bylaws say the chair must remain neutral during an election, so a pair of Miami lawyers, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, sued the DNC and former chair Wasserman Schultz in federal court, claiming on behalf of more than 100 people that the congresswoman had committed fraud against Bernie Sanders donors by rigging the primary for Clinton.

After months of hearings, Judge William Zloch, a Regan appointee, stated that Jared and Elizabeth Beck had proved their case – the DNC, led by Wasserman Schultz, committed fraud:


But he threw the DNC Fraud Lawsuit out of court, writing that the plaintiffs had failed to prove their injury, calling it “too diffuse” for Federal court, and instructing Sanders donors to pursue justice from within the Democratic National Committee, not the law courts.

The extraordinary verdict has left legal experts reeling. For months they have been claiming it was an open and shut case. Article 5, Section 4 of the DNC Charter, also known as the Impartiality Clause, reads as follows:

the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.

Earlier this year, lawyers representing the DNC astoundingly argued that the committee was not bound by law to hold fair elections, a claim that — while potentially true — lifted the lid on the deep-seated corruption at the heart of the party.


Newspunch has provided coverage on the case during the last year, including statements made by the Becks which indicated deep concern after the deaths of their process server Shawn Lucas and potential lawsuit witness Seth Rich. The case took an ominous turn after the Beck’s offices received a series of disturbing calls, one of which was traced to a number matching Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s office in Aventura. A motion seeking legal protection for the Becks, those associated with the case and their plaintiffs was later dismissed.


Disobedient Media report: This dismissal comes amidst increasingly turbulent scandal surrounding former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and her involvement with Imran Awan, an IT staffer for leading Democrats, who was arrested while attempting to flee the country for Pakistan. Fox News also connected the Awan brothers scandal to the DNC fraud lawsuit when they aired allegations that the Awans may have participated in the voice-modulated call made from Shultz’ office to the Becks.


There had been some speculation that the potential for discovery in the DNC lawsuit could have revealed damaging information beyond the issue of Bernie Sanders having been cheated out of the nomination during the Democratic primary last year. Many have argued that the case had the potential to shed light on the death of Seth Rich, and possibly disprove the Russian hacking narrative if the case had gone forward.

The news has been met with outrage by many, who view the ruling as a final indictment against the judicial system and any pretense of a functioning American democracy.

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Email: baxter@thepeoplesvoice.tv
Baxter Dmitry


  1. Ronald bola of 12764 newport ave #d Tustin ca 92780 married and paid Albina Danganan to obtain a green card. He is now a naturalized citizen. His son Aaron got a free ride in Buffalo University of medicine and likes having sex with boys.

  2. While the article provides a reason “…above the law” why does it quote only failing to prove damages as the reason? Why didn’t the article quote the full text, at least down to the words; “above the law”
    Is this fake new?

    • Much of the news here at New-Poop is exaggerated or is indeed fake. Much of this is not even referred by a source and there is no info on who wrote the article.

  3. They should refile and argue fraud rather than violation of bylaws. Donors have a reasonable expectation of fairness & absence of deliberate cheating/partiality when they donate to support a political party. Plaintiffs can collect mass signatures from donors stating that is what they believed and they feel they were injured due to the misuse of their funds and departure from public statements, bylaws, and presumption of fairness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.