Julian Assange Denied Bail By British Court

Fact checked

Judge said that his past conduct had shown Assange was a flight risk


A British court ruled on Wednesday to deny bail to WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange.

Assange is now forced to remain at the high-security Belmarsh prison in London while lawyers for the US justice department try to secure his extradition from Britain.

The ruling comes just two days after the same judge refused to allow his extradition for prosecution in the US.

RT reports: Assange was seeking bail in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court presided over by District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, who on Monday ruled against his extradition.

The activist had already served a 50-week sentence in the UK for jumping bail in 2012 when he hid in London’s Ecuadorian Embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden.

The judge said Assange “has an incentive to abscond,” adding that there is a good chance he would not return to court if freed.

Assange was also previously denied bail in September 2019, when Judge Baraitser ruled that there were “substantial grounds” to believe he would “abscond again.”

Assange’s lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald, argued that the decision to refuse extradition “massively reduces” the defendant’s motivation to flee.

“Mr. Assange has every reason to stay in this jurisdiction, where he has the protection of the rule of law and this court’s decision,” he said.

Fitzgerald said Assange would be safer at home, with his partner Stella Moris and the couple’s two young sons, than in prison, where there is “a very grave crisis of Covid.”

WikiLeaks Editor-in-Chief Kristinn Hrafnsson slammed the denial of bail by the judge as “unjust, unfair, and illogical, [especially] when you consider her ruling two days ago about Julian’s health.”

Baraitser refused to allow extradition, citing a concern that the US justice system could not prevent Assange from possibly taking his own life.

Hrafnsson noted that Assange’s physical and mental health has deteriorated while behind bars in Belmarsh.

To send him back there doesn’t make any sense.

The WikiLeaks co-founder could face a maximum of 175 years in prison in the US, if found guilty on all 18 counts related to the conspiracy to obtain and release classified documents pertaining to the conduct of US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.


  1. The British sign should have said – Facts Should Not be a Crime.or Government Secrets Protect the Establishment

    Truth is something else.

    British people still haven’t comprehended the idea of a first amendment, which is why Britain severely criminalizes so-called hate speech and criminalizes the public revelation of government secrets.

    In the US, there is a first amendment, but Democrats and Neocons don’t honor it.

  2. He didnt hide in the ecuadorian embassy at all He was granted permission to stay there BECAUSE the Catholic Ecuadorians realized how useful he could be in their anti american propagandas And he had bern ever so useful to the establishment in that arena already plus facilitated the total global internet censorship they do desperately needed in order to deceive the whole world

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.