Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) informed the House of Representatives on Wednesday that she has been served a subpoena “to produce documents in a criminal case” in California.
A source familiar with the matter told Fox News the subpoena is related to the case of Paul Pelosi’s alleged home invasion attacker.
Pelosi’s statement regarding the subpoena was read by the House Clerk, which is standard procuedue when a member is issued a subpoena related to a civil or criminal matter.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
“This is to notify you formally pursuant to Rule Eight of the rules of the House of Representatives, that I, the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker Emerita, and U.S. Representative for the 11th Congressional District of California, have been served with third party subpoenas from the prosecution and the defendant to produce documents in a criminal case and United States District Court for the Northern District of California,” Pelosi’s statement read.
“After consultation with the Office of General Counsel, I have determined that compliance with the subpoenas is consistent with the privileges and of the House to the extent it requires production of non-privileged information. The responses to the subpoenas will be identical,” it added.
Pelosi’s office declined to comment on an ongoing legal matter, but a source familiar with the situation told Fox News Digital the subpoena was related to the upcoming trial of Paul Pelosi’s alleged assailant in a violent home invasion last year.
The man who allegedly attacked him, David DePape, is set to go on trial next week.
Her husband’s boy toy and trickster of many trades for the Pelosi investment fund imo .
When something is gross I like to say, “Grossy Grossy Nancy Pelosi”
The staged burglary, the window shards where widely broken outwards the house as if someone broke the window from inside. The probably drugged sex toy, probably was in a fight over payments. Remember Mooshammer didn’t wanted to pay his 70yrs younger boy for monney. Old ugly men need to pay to have someone so young willing to have sex with them it’s surely no pleasure.
Here’s another story exemplifying the rule of corporatism.
ASIC and the case of the missing gold.
Malcolm Roberts You tube.
This is even more buried than Pelosi treasure chest.
Watch the defendant protected by anonymity and everything just refuse to answer the Government’s questions and clearly demonstrate total contempt really for them daring to stick their nose’s into the Royal mints business( I’m presuming that’s who it’s about.) But that’s because I saw the source of the investigation on youtube. But it exemplifies Australia really.