A Washington D.C. judge has ruled that former President Barack Hussein Obama recieved illegal campaign funds during his 2012 re-election campaign.
On Wednesday, rapper Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, of the 1990s hip-hop group Fugees, was convicted on charges involving multi-million-dollar political conspiracies over the course of two presidencies.
Michel was convicted after a trial that included testimony from Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio and former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
The rapper was caught funnelling money from a now-fugitive Malaysian financer through straw donors to Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.
Slaynews.com reports: He then attempted to squelch a Justice Department investigation and influence an extradition case on behalf of China under the Trump administration.
A federal court jury found him guilty of all charges, including conspiracy and acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government.
The defense argued the Grammy-winning rapper simply wanted to make money and got bad legal advice as he reinvented himself in the world of politics.
Michel declined to comment after the verdict.
His attorney, however, said he’s “extremely disappointed” in the outcome of the case and plans to appeal.
“This is not over,” attorney David Kenner said.
“I remain very, very confident, we will ultimately prevail.”
Michel first met Malaysian financier Low Taek Jho in 2006, when the businessman usually known as Jho Low was dropping huge sums of money and hobnobbing with the likes of Paris Hilton.
Low helped finance Hollywood films, including “The Wolf of Wall Street.”
DiCaprio testified that Low had appeared to him as a legitimate businessman and had mentioned wanting to donate to Obama’s campaign.
Michel also testified in his own defense.
He said Low wanted a picture with Obama in 2012 and was willing to pay millions of dollars to get it.
Michel agreed to help and used some of the money he got to pay for friends to attend fundraising events.
No one had ever told him that was illegal, he said.
Prosecutors said Michel was donating the money on Low’s behalf, and later tried to lean on the straw donors with texts from burner phones to keep them from talking to investigators.
After the election of Donald Trump, prosecutors say Michel again took millions to halt an investigation into allegations Low masterminded a money laundering and bribery scheme.
The scheme pilfered billions from the Malaysian state investment fund known as 1MDB.
Low is now an international fugitive and has maintained his innocence.
Michel also got paid to try and persuade the U.S. to extradite back to China a government critic suspected of crimes there without registering as a foreign agent, prosecutors said.
On that charge, the defense pointed to testimony from Sessions, who was Trump’s top law enforcement officer until he resigned in 2018.
Sessions said he’d been aware the Chinese government wanted the extradition but didn’t know Michel.
The rapper’s ultimately futile efforts to arrange a meeting on the topic didn’t seem improper, former AG Sessions said.
Sean Adl-Tabatabai
A doctor from Berkely I heard saying that Mrs Windsor donated 4 million as someone not even an American.
The “I didn’t know it was illegal” defense is usually only used by jail-house lawyers . . . who are in there for the same damn thing . . . and the homosexual Kenyan should be drawn and quartered. TRUMP 2024
Trump Vows to Eradicate Homosexual Persecution Worldwide – The People’s Voice
Trump was also a listed as a passenger on the Lolita Express.
No one I know wants to persecute homosexuals . . . do you? WE THE PEOPLE don’t want perverts shaking their wieners in small children’s faces . . . do you? I don’t think that is persecution . . . do you? I know that Pres Trump flew on the plane once, I also know that when he found out about Epstein’s pederasty he immediately barred Epstein from all of his properties . . . did you know that?
TRUMP 2024 ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTE . . . NOT EVEN DESANTIS.
Trump Is Controlled Opposition As they ALL Are.
Rothschilds & Donald Trump:
Donald Trump’s goals are completely aligned with the goals and agendas of Satanist-Globalist Rothschild’s, e.g., when Trump was in bankruptcy after the US real estate crash of the 1980s, just before he was about to lose everything, he was bailed out by Rothschild Inc. and, thereafter, became social and personal friends of the Rothschild family. Trump now serves the financial interests of the Rothschild global enterprise, especially in the Middle East where the US engages in Wars that, covertly, are waged to bring oil resources under the control of Rothschild oil companies. Wilbur Ross, a former senior managing director at Rothschild Inc., was appointed by Trump as soon as he became President to be the Director of the US Department of Commerce, a position that is a source of ‘suggestions’ for US policy in such matters…This would be reminiscent of the maneuver by which the Rothschild’s, acting through the Bank of England, bailed out J.P. Morgan during the Wall Street Panic of 1857 and, thereafter, became the hidden controllers of the Morgan banking dynasty. For that story, see Creature from Jekyll Island, pp. 407-419.]
Donald Trump’s 66th Floor Penthouse Exposes His Idol ‘sun god’ Apollo/Apollyon/Satan
(Just checked the link on this youtube video which The People’s Voice won’t allow away, and it states, “This video is no longer available”…Surprised, Surprised (Not) – are you?
Is Hillary Clinton at least in jail for her Crimes…Has Obama been held Accountable for the Usurpation of The Office of the President – I do seem to recall Trump promising he would hold them Accountable – We’re Still Waiting.
As far as “persecuting” homosexuals – not unless they attempt to force their lifestyle choices on children.
I know you could blather away for hours with your half-assed, cherry-picked little nuggets of misleading info but I really don’t give a f what you think. I make my own decisions based on my uptake and I have been paying attention a long time. I have one question for you . . . who do you think has a better chance of defeating the Marxists that have seized control of our government besides Pres Trump? Don’t obfuscate or waste my time with your worn-out leftover anti-Trump talking points that have existed since he announced his candidacy. When you reiterate old BS as a new revelation it shows an amazing lack of respect to others that ALSO pay attention and are really sick of responding to the same old DEM/RINO talking points. So tell me Einstein, WHO HAS YOUR VOTE? If you don’t supply a name I will consider you a bot/troll and block.
Obama when born in 1961 was a British Subject via his British Subject father, per the British Nationality Act of 1948 which governed the status of children born to British Subjects. Obama thus was born with dual citizenship and allegiances and a foreign claim on his allegiance. Obama is not a natural born citizen of the USA and he is and was not eligible to be the President under Article II of Our U.S. Constitution. He is a Usurper.
While a natural born Citizen is obviously a Citizen at birth, not all Citizens at birth are natural born Citizens at birth. The two legal terms of art are not identical and are not equal. All “natural born Citizens” are Citizens at birth but not all Citizens are “natural born Citizens” at birth. If you cannot grasp that logic concept then try this analogy, “all trees are plants but not all plants are trees”.
There are five types of Citizenship mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. All Citizens have equal rights as a member of the society but not all Citizens have the privilege and legal eligibility requirements to be the President and Commander in Chief of the Military under Article II of our Constitution, the fundamental law of our nation.
There is absolutely nothing in that U.S. Statute, USC Title 8 Section 1401 that addresses “natural born Citizenship”. The law addresses basic “Citizenship at Birth”, i.e., who is a “Citizen by Birth”, (which is needed under various situations and conditions of a child’s birth spelled out in Section 1401) which requires such a man-made act of law to grant the Citizenship by an act of Congress, i.e., naturalized at birth by act of Congress. USC 1401 does not grant “natural born Citizenship” to anyone. Natural born Citizens do not need man-made laws to grant them Citizenship. The facts of nature of their birth do that. The legal term of art “natural born Citizen” is not even mentioned in that law. USC Title 8 Section 1401 only determines by law who is a “Citizen” or a “National” of the U.S. at birth, i.e., a basic “Citizen at birth”, i.e., a person entitled to the rights and privileges of membership in the society of our nation under our Constitution, the supreme and fundamental law of our nation. The Section 1401 law is a naturalization law which grants citizenship by law, not by nature. The legal term of art “Citizen at birth” is not the same legally as the legal term of art “natural born Citizen”. Simply note that in one case we are talking about who is at least an ordinary, basic “Citizen” at birth with no adjectives in front of the word Citizen, and in the other case we have two very important adjectives placed in front of the word Citizen by the framers of the Constitution, i.e., “natural born” Citizen. Since that term was used in the Constitution only once in Article II for singular most powerful office in our new federal government, the framers intended that it have special meaning. And the source of that meaning is written down and well known by legal scholars. That specific type of citizenship and “legal term of art” natural born Citizen was codified by Vattel in his legal treatise “The Law of Nations and Principles of Natural Law”, published in 1758, in which he said that … a natural born citizen is a person born in the country to parents who are both citizens of the country. And this group or class of citizens are the most populous group of any nation. They do not need statutory law to be considered Citizens of the nation. Nature and the facts of their birth in the country to two Citizen parents granted that to them, not Congress.
Most citizens of the USA are natural born citizens. Most citizens of the USA were born in the USA to two parents who were citizens of the USA. And that is the pool of citizens that must be chosen from for the singular most powerful office in Our nation, the President and Commander-in-Chief of Our military. Simple citizenship at birth by being born in the USA without regard to the citizenship status of both your parents … or by naturalization and swearing an Oath to this country and renouncing all allegiances foreign kings, princes, and potentates later as an adult, is adequate for the offices of Senator, Representative, or a Governor of a state. But it is not sufficient to be the President under Article II, to Constitutional Standards. Article II requires that the person to be eligible to be President Must be a “natural born Citizen”. And that means that person Must be born in the USA … AND … both his parents must be citizens of the USA.
Obama when born in 1961 was a British Subject via his British Subject father, per the British Nationality Act of 1948 which governed the status of children born to British Subjects. Obama thus was born with dual citizenship and allegiances and a foreign claim on his allegiance. Obama is not a natural born citizen of the USA and he is and was not eligible to be the President under Article II of Our U.S. Constitution. He is a Usurper – NOTHING he did or signed in Our Name Is Legal Or Binding.
While a natural born Citizen is obviously a Citizen at birth, not all Citizens at birth are natural born Citizens at birth. The two legal terms of art are not identical and are not equal. All “natural born Citizens” are Citizens at birth but not all Citizens are “natural born Citizens” at birth. If you cannot grasp that logic concept then try this analogy, “all trees are plants but not all plants are trees”.
There are five types of Citizenship mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. All Citizens have equal rights as a member of the society but not all Citizens have the privilege and legal eligibility requirements to be the President and Commander in Chief of the Military under Article II of our Constitution, the fundamental law of our nation.
There is absolutely nothing in that U.S. Statute, USC Title 8 Section 1401 that addresses “natural born Citizenship”. The law addresses basic “Citizenship at Birth”, i.e., who is a “Citizen by Birth”, (which is needed under various situations and conditions of a child’s birth spelled out in Section 1401) which requires such a man-made act of law to grant the Citizenship by an act of Congress, i.e., naturalized at birth by act of Congress. USC 1401 does not grant “natural born Citizenship” to anyone. Natural born Citizens do not need man-made laws to grant them Citizenship. The facts of nature of their birth do that. The legal term of art “natural born Citizen” is not even mentioned in that law. USC Title 8 Section 1401 only determines by law who is a “Citizen” or a “National” of the U.S. at birth, i.e., a basic “Citizen at birth”, i.e., a person entitled to the rights and privileges of membership in the society of our nation under our Constitution, the supreme and fundamental law of our nation. The Section 1401 law is a naturalization law which grants citizenship by law, not by nature. The legal term of art “Citizen at birth” is not the same legally as the legal term of art “natural born Citizen”. Simply note that in one case we are talking about who is at least an ordinary, basic “Citizen” at birth with no adjectives in front of the word Citizen, and in the other case we have two very important adjectives placed in front of the word Citizen by the framers of the Constitution, i.e., “natural born” Citizen. Since that term was used in the Constitution only once in Article II for singular most powerful office in our new federal government, the framers intended that it have special meaning. And the source of that meaning is written down and well known by legal scholars. That specific type of citizenship and “legal term of art” natural born Citizen was codified by Vattel in his legal treatise “The Law of Nations and Principles of Natural Law”, published in 1758, in which he said that … a natural born citizen is a person born in the country to parents who are both citizens of the country. And this group or class of citizens are the most populous group of any nation. They do not need statutory law to be considered Citizens of the nation. Nature and the facts of their birth in the country to two Citizen parents granted that to them, not Congress.
Most citizens of the USA are natural born citizens. Most citizens of the USA were born in the USA to two parents who were citizens of the USA. And that is the pool of citizens that must be chosen from for the singular most powerful office in Our nation, the President and Commander-in-Chief of Our military. Simple citizenship at birth by being born in the USA without regard to the citizenship status of both your parents … or by naturalization and swearing an Oath to this country and renouncing all allegiances foreign kings, princes, and potentates later as an adult, is adequate for the offices of Senator, Representative, or a Governor of a state. But it is not sufficient to be the President under Article II, to Constitutional Standards. Article II requires that the person to be eligible to be President Must be a “natural born Citizen”. And that means that person Must be born in the USA … AND … both his parents must be citizens of the USA.