Pelosi Has Meltdown calls CNN ‘Apologists’ For The Republicans!

Fact checked

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi became unhinged when CNN host Wolf Blitzer pressed her on why she hasn’t agreed to a compromise Coronavirus relief bill.

After a dispute with Blitzer over the House Democrats’ refusal to take a deal from the Trump White House for Covid-19 relief, Pelosi called the network “apologists for the Republican position”

RT reports: Tuesday’s outburst – which provided comic relief for critics of CNN’s anti-Trump and anti-conservative bias – came as Blitzer grilled Pelosi on why she hasn’t come to agreement with Republicans on economic-relief legislation after the Trump administration offered a $1.8 trillion package.

The interview went off the rails as Blitzer pointed to the fact that some House Democrats want to accept the proposal, citing a tweet by Representative Ro Khanna saying the offer was more than double former president Barack Obama’s economic-stimulus program in 2009. “People in need can’t wait until February,” Khanna said, referencing when relief checks might go out if the issue is tabled until after the November 3 election.

“I don’t know why you’re always an apologist, and many of your colleagues apologists for the Republican position,” Pelosi told Blitzer. “Ro Khanna, that’s nice. That isn’t what we’re going to do, and nobody’s waiting until February.”

Blitzer persisted, pointing out that millions of Americans have lost their jobs and can’t pay their rent or buy food for their families. He said, “Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good” and cited a conversation with former Democrat presidential candidate Andrew Yang, who also favors compromise.

“Honest to God, you really, I can’t get over it,” Pelosi said. “Andrew Yang, he’s lovely. Ro Khanna, he’s lovely. They’re not negotiating this situation. They have no idea of the particulars.” She then told Blitzer that “you really don’t know what you’re talking about,” and said he needs to show “some level of respect” to the people who have worked on the legislation.

Blitzer then tried to wrap up the interview, but both he and Pelosi resisted giving each other the last word. After Pelosi again told him he was wrong on the issue, Blitzer said, “It’s not about me, it’s about millions of Americans who can’t put food on the table, who can’t pay the rent.” Pelosi then talked over the host, saying, “We represent them, and we know them.”

As Blitzer again hinted that the interview was ending, thanking Pelosi, she snarked, “Thank you for your sensitivity to our constituents’ needs,” to which the host replied, “I am sensitive to them because I see them on the street begging for food, begging for money.” Pelosi was again triggered, saying, “Have you fed them? We feed them. We feed them.”

Twitter users found the exchange hilarious, with journalist Glenn Greenwald saying, “This is simply unbelievable… Not sure I’ve ever seen a performance quite like this, especially given what’s at stake.” He added, “She feeds them.”


      • I agree with Bonacci, but them pedo’s don’t own MY soul, lol. They’ve tried, and still try, oh well, at least they try. They own the pig’s soul.

  1. There’s a video floating about in purgatory on brand new tube ,maybe even on you tube ,that explains that the CARES Act was signed or tabled in January 2019.Yes 2019. And it’s name was the Corona virus Aid Relief and Economic Stimulus Act .And Trump announced it and it’s name .And it went through all the House sittings and so on over early 2019 until it was passed about a month after they broadcast Wuhan as the source .Trump read it to the media saying that it was the most historic act in the world’s history ,the biggest financial package ever created .He said that it was going to be from 2 billion up to Ithunk he said 6 or 7 billion TRILLION .Those were his words .And he did NOT correct himself .Think about the bribes that money can pay to get everyone necessary to comply to micro chipping humanity .The real purpose of it all .

    • And the interesting thing is he read it from a piece of paper that he appears to be seeing for the first time .A speech prepared for him to read to the media by God knows who. What sources. And he reads it as if it’s something almost incidental to his urgent busines That’s how ” they ” using the rule of law, do it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.