Questions Raised Around License Of Psych Prof Who Called Trump ‘Mentally Impaired’

Fact checked
The psychiatrist who appeared on mainstream media accusing Trump of mental instability is a fraud with no license to practice psychiatry.

Mainstream media reacted with glee last week when a psychiatrist went public with claims President Trump is suffering from mentally instability – and worse. However these same media outlets now have egg on their face, because the psychiatrist they were so keen to promote as an authority on the president’s health appears not to have a license in her home state of Connecticut.

Update: Dr. Lee has clarified since the publication of this article that she “has always held a medical license in New York State. Her work is nationwide, she is Board-certified, and other licenses can be reinstated upon request as long as she holds one valid license.”

As The Daily Caller notes,

The professor, Bandy Lee, made the headlines over the past few days when she made a diagnosis of the president as suffering from a “mental impairment” that would disqualify him from the highest office in the land.

Following Lee’s comments, the American Psychiatric Association released a statement on Tuesday warning members of its profession to refrain from making public diagnoses of public figures like Trump without a proper medical exam.

“We at the APA call for an end to psychiatrists providing professional opinions in the media about public figures whom they have not examined, whether it be on cable news appearances, books, or in social media,” wrote the APA, without mentioning Lee specifically. “Arm-chair psychiatry or the use of psychiatry as a political tool is the misuse of psychiatry and is unacceptable and unethical.”

Lee and her colleague responded to the issue in a piece to Politico on Wednesday, in which they claimed it is “perfectly OK to question the president’s mental state” because of their profession as “psychiatrists.”

The professor, who has met with lawmakers in Capitol Hill to talk about the issue, is now facing scrutiny amid allegations that she is not licensed to practice psychology in Connecticut.

Campus Reform reports that state records indicate that Lee’s “physician/surgeon” license expired some three years ago — on May 31, 2015 — and that her application for reinstatement has been pending ever since. The publication was able to produce Lee’s license details to back up the claim.

In addition to her pending physician’s license, the professor’s “controlled substance registration for practitioner” license is also lapsed, having expired last February. In other words, Lee is not legally able to prescribe medication as a medical practitioner.

Lee responded to Campus Reform’s inquiries, stating simply: “I only need one license.” She did not clarify precisely what license she has, or in which state she is registered.

Even though Dr. Lee is a real psychiatrist, she is breaking the profession’s most serious rule.

Diagnosing someone without meeting them, much less treating them, is a taboo in the medical profession. The American Psychiatric Association’s so-called “Goldwater Rule” prevents psychiatrists from offering a professional opinion on someone they haven’t treated.

That didn’t stop Dr. Lee from trying to make a quick buck with a book about Trump’s imagined mental health.

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Baxter Dmitry


  1. put her in jail for impersonating a medical practitioner and never allow her to practice medicine thereafter. It’s high time that these Libetards are made to pay the price for lying

    • Anyone who isn’t actively in a state of denial can see that she has clear credentials of an MD from Yale and residency at MGH. It is you who is lying. Stick to the subject of disagreeing with her position if you want, but don’t make yourself look stupid just to try to make a point that isn’t even true. Using pejorative terms such as “Libtard” don’t further your point either. They also just make you look stupid, not them. (BTW, I am a far from liberal as one can get.)

      • The issue is that she isn’t even competent enough to keep her own house in order, allowed her medical license and her license to prescribe controlled substances expire. A psychiatrist who isn’t competent enough to even manage their own lives is defined by those critical flaws more so than the paper on their walls. The straw man about her “credentials” is a distraction that is belied by the fact she can’t keep hershit together. Was she practicing medicine after May 2015? Did she write prescriptions after February 2017? If she did, then she has more serious issues to worry about other than plugging her book.

        There are plenty of “credentialled” doctors sitting in prison for all sorts of things, murder, dealing drugs, embezzlement, defrauding the federal government. You willfully conflate credentials with competence and lawfulness, as well as demand respect for someone who has given good cause not to receive it.

        If I say Trump is crazy, that’s an opinion, if Dr. Bandy X Lee says it, that’s not merely an opinion, to suggest it is isn’t honest, especially after so vehemently arguing the merits of her credentials in this very comments section. Bandy doesn’t have the luxury of offering her “opinion” that President Trump is mentally ill, not in a book, not in meetings with members of congress, not promoting her book. Dr. Bandy X Lee was offering a DIAGNOSES.

        She violated Goldwater Rule, not law, but breaking it defines the type of doctor and opportunist that Bandy X Lee is. It’s also considered by the APA to be irresponsible, potentially stigmatizing, and definitely unethical

        You have to be consistent, you lecture people about her credentials and resume out of one side of your mouth while dismissing her misconduct and the FORMAL POLICY of the APA out of the other, all while ignoring the fact that she has likely been practicing medicine and prescribing controlled substances while licensed to do neither.

        You claim that you are as far from a liberal as it gets, yet your condescension, smugness and the fact that you are needlessly sesquipedalian sure makes you appear to be one. What sort of insecurities must one harbor to feel compelled to use such complex words when simple ones will get their point across so much more effectively?

  2. This is so ridiculous. There is a fairly large segment of society that appears to have simply lost it’s mind. They will stop at nothing to advance their mindless, often baseless prejudices. Sad thing is, even though this woman is now exposed as a fraud, it won’t matter. The loons will keep repeating their false charges. Was it Hitler who said that if a big enough lie is repeated, eventually the people will come to believe it!

      • No it was not Hitler. It’s a very old expression. He was referring to
        the fake & impossible Zionist propaganda about ‘gassing Jews’, etc.

        You mean the ‘Holocau$t’ scam

        The ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
        see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:
        No name calling, level playing field debate here:
        The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked
        narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are
        arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged
        Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that
        denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no
        protection from scrutiny.

        Only liars demand censorship.

          • Who was the U.S. General (?) who said to document the atrocities at various holocaust sites as in the future there would be those that would deny it happened?
            History now reveals him to be correct.
            And, yes, only a fool would claim “Nothing happened”..even in the face of such overwhelming evidence in the form of eye-witness testimony, precise German accounting, in-numeral photos and film.

          • It was Dwight D. Eisenhower. He gave the order to film everything they saw because “in fifty years some son-of-a-bitch will say that this did not happen”!

        • You actually expect people to visit the site and debate a bunch of mentally ill, sub human, holocaust deniers who accept fiction as fact? It’s like “Dungeons and Dragons” except the nerds are nazis. No thanks, you and your crazy associates can stew in your own hate alone.

          • Wally is a jerk. All one has to do is visit the sites where the Jews and others were gassed to death and it’s impossible to deny, go to the Holocaust Museum, one thing Eisenhower did was make sure lots of pictures were taken. He said, “Take lots of pictures because some bastard will come along and try and say it didn’t happen”. Wally is one of those. From mass graves where the prisoners were just shot are many. One visitor said that after the war he went to Poland to see the death camp and came upon a large mound of dirt that was oozing blood because of all the bodies the Nazis tried to hide. The burning of the Jews was the Muslims’s idea and Hitler used it. Hitler was quite close with the Muslims.

          • Everyone was somewhere on the list, it was simply a matter of prioritization and timing. That’s confirmed by the fact that one of the first groups Hitler annihilated were the brownshirts. Loyal to him, hard core nazis, but when Hitler had to decide between which group of hard core nazis best suited his future needs, it wasn’t the brownshirts. They were literally liquidated and the famous Night of the Long Knives was about the slaying of the brownshirt leadership. Weirdos like Wally and his band of shoe scraping misfits fantasize about how great the world would be had Hitler prevailed but wouldn’t have made it to adulthood under the nazis. He is only able to exist because the fantasy world he dreams of does not.

          • Wally and his phony friends would have been the first to be liquidated..Even their hero Hitler wouldn’t trust people more insane them him…much like Trump in fact!

          • Read your history–Hitler was a lined with Progressives .. and Progressives with Hitler. Goebbels said “tell a lie often enough and loud enough and the people will believe it!” Another alignment Hitler & Progressive Liberals: EUGENICS aka Planned Parenthood and Abortion!!

          • More fuzz from the fuzzy-wuzzy useful idiot. Oh…such a cutesy-cute name you’ve chosen for yourself.

          • No only a doctor can diagnose in absentia or diagnose, I am merely rendering an opinion, but there is plenty of anecdotal evidence to support it. But, congratulations for advocating on behalf of neo nazis.

          • lol

            It’s irrelevant whether or not you’re a doctor, the point was to highlight your double-mindedness and hypocrisy.

            I advocate on behalf of the truth, wherever it leads, first and foremost. If at any point that coincides with political agendas or talking points on either side of the aisle, I’ll be among the first to acknowledge it.

            If you’re going to start throwing around pejoratives, labels and ad hominem to smear and malign an entire wing of the political spectrum, (which by your logic would be comprised of only two groups: Liberals and Nazis) you should be aware that accusing literally everyone even slightly to the right of you of being mass-murdering, anti-human psychopaths is a decidedly COMMUNIST construct.

            I’d like to think that someone who presumes to know so much about history as to equate hundreds of thousands of his contemporaries and peers whom he has never even met with a nationalist faction from over half a century ago would know a little bit about the actual history of political discourse and the rise of insurrectionist factions within governments around the world, but apparently not.

          • I hold neo nazis in no regard whatsoever, I don’t ignore their politics, I just seek to destroy them and use those who put forward their twisted beliefs to expose to others what they are. I have no misconceptions that I can change your mind, you are simply a tool to accomplish what I seek to accomplish. You can’t possibly believe that anyone who debates you does so because they hold even the slightest respect of you or the positions that you, Wally and all the other neo nazis express? That would certainly be folly.

            You claim to advocate on the behalf of truth? What truth is that? You haven’t actually expressed what you believe the truth to be. However, it’s 100% safe to assume that anyone who advocates for neo nazis who deny the holocaust share those views, since only other true believers would touch down on that side of the issue.

            The evidence holocaust deniers offer is garbage. I have read it and researched it, anything that even seems slightly compelling at first glance ALWAYS turns out to be unsubstantiated and fabricated. The beliefs that they subscribe to are so baseless and insulting to the intellect that they are truly unworthy of any respect whatsoever. Believing in fallacy that cannot be proven because it’s demonstrably false? That’s insane in my opinion. Since I am not a board certified and licensed psychiatrist, I cannot diagnose mental illness, but I am willing to wager that my layman’s conclusion would be upheld by anyone professionally qualified to render such a diagnoses.

            Ad hominem attack? You labor under another misconception here, that all ad hominems attacks are based in errors in reasoning, when some are indeed fair use. I’ll give you that I use ad hominems towards the imbeciles who are neo nazis and holocaust deniers, but I resolutely maintain that when directed towards such subhuman filth, it’s fair use, I reject any argument to the contrary in its entirety.

            It’s 100% baseles to assert that my belief system is comprised of only liberals and nazis. Anyone who has read my comments going back many, many years at the Daily Caller, Breitbart, the Washington Times and when trolling liberals at the Washington Post, Huffington Post will know that the positions I have consistently presented are staunchly right. Not RINO, not centrist right, but staunchly and definitively right. Your assertion isn’t supported by ANYTHING other than my rejection of neo nazis and holocaust deniers, which means that YOU are the one deluding under the supposition that anyone even slightly to the left of you is a liberal. Talk about a COMMUNIST construct. I willingly concede that I consider neo nazis to be every bit as subhuman and psychopathic as they are inconsequential and laughably irrelevant.

            You clearly believe that being sesquipedalian, littering your argument with equivocation and appeals to ignorance puts you on top in a debate, when the arguments you make are illogical, baseless, made up from whole cloth and often just in your face dishonest (e.g. “I advocate on behalf of the truth”). The only thing worse than the folly of your arguments is the pointlessness of the entirety of your existence (there’s another example of a fair use ad hominem attack for ya!).

            Have a good day and don’t let the long knives get you in the back!

          • Yet here you are accusing me of your very own behavior as you engage in it!

            – You claim my arguments are characterized by equivocation and appeals to ignorance, yet you make sweeping, “just take my word for it” claims that it’s all just a bunch of bunk about literal tomes of material questioning various aspects of Holocaust lore from dozens of scholars and academics. You reinforce fire with flame by, forget implying, outright presuming that anyone and everyone who questions aspects of holocaust lore is a literal Nazi. Can you not see the raging hypocrisy in that?

            – I do appreciate your assertion that my perception that your attitude is that anyone to the right of you is a Nazi is undermined by an interpretation of the same that could be derived that I’m likewise assuming anyone to the left of me is a liberal. I don’t assume that and have a deep appreciation for just how broad the political spectrum actually is, but it’s a fair counter-point and I acknowledge it and gladly digress a moment here to say if I misjudged you on that point, I apologize. But the reason why I asserted that is because YOU were actually saying in earlier comments and said as much in your most recent one that everyone who contends with the holocaust narrative on any level is a Nazi.

            – I also take issue with your choice of words in describing these people who you sweepingly broad brush and condemn as Nazis without any regard for what they actually believe. “Subhuman”??? People who question things because they’re unconvinced by the evidence presented to them for it are subhuman Nazis?

            Nazis are denounced by people on the basis that they supposedly viewed everyone not of their race to be subhuman, and this is purported to be an unconscionable crime against humanity. The crime of thinking other humans are less human than you. The people that can actually be demonstrated to have genuinely believed this throughout history, whether one finds their evidence compelling or not, usually argued their case with empirical evidence and real world observations that boiled down to an argument that some tribes of people are inferior to others, subhuman even, because of a disparity between their capacity for building civilizations and grasping the intricate ideas and principles upon which they are founded.

            Since you insist on focusing on the vulgar understanding of things rather than the learned one, let’s just simplify this by saying the consensus I speak of is that the great crime of the Nazis at the root of every misdeed they are alleged to have committed, is that they viewed their fellow man as being subhuman because they seemed to not see the world the way they saw it.

            This is presumably the underpinning for your seething disdain for all you label as Nazis as well. And yet this is precisely what YOU are doing, in calling so-called Nazis “subhuman.” Your reasoning is circular and extremely hypocritical. You are exhibiting for all the world to say the very same bigotry you fancy yourself so superior to so-called Nazis for having.

            I’d further note that one of the other great crimes attributed to the Nazis is the marginalization and dehumanization of vast numbers of people on the basis of superficial designations and attributions. And yet you yourself are doing this very thing, in refusing to consider that just as someone like you can sound just like a flaming Communist in the way you attack people on the right, yet you can be something other than a leftist, other people can question some of the same things that actual Nazis question and not be an actual devotee of Nazism.

            The hypocrisies piled upon hypocrisy in your comments are truly in a league all their own. It’s hard to even know where to begin with you because you claim a moral high ground that you clearly have no interest in actually holding by trying to hold other people to standards you clearly have no intention of adhering to yourself. While expecting everyone else to just accept your laughable claim to without question.

            I’m all for having a civil and productive discussion. If I’m wrong about something, I WANT to know. But to reason with people, one has to be reasonable, and the one thing you’ve said so far that was reasonable (which I acknowledged earlier) was instantly undermined by pretty much everything else you said.

          • Are the outrageous levels of hypocrisy folks who think like you operate under the auspices of totally lost on you, or is your moral compass so screwed up that you just don’t care so long as you get an excuse to be bigoted towards people you dislike and disagree with?

          • Says the hypocritical littlebitch that whines about ad hominem attacks when he doesn’t like where they are directed.

          • Just because you didn’t understand the comeback doesn’t make it incoherent. By the way…please drop all the “lol”s. They are sooooooo boring and meaningless with their constant usage by so many these days. Try to be a bit more original.

        • Really dumb azz were you there , I know someone who was at auschwitz my father inlaw and he said troops were sick to their stomachs and crying when they seen the Jews . He was there and it was real so you keep spewing the Bull shit line making yourself out to be what you are a fool !

          • Why does everyone who sees contentions with the Holocaust narrative automatically equate whatever is being said with abject denial that camps even existed?

            No one denies that people you knew saw horrible things. The debate is over whether or not there’s any evidence for a genocidal agenda of Nazi Germany. There’s more than one explanation for significant numbers of corpses and emaciated survivors.

            I could at least respect your indignation if you showed any outrage over the scores of millions that the Communists slaughtered, the unspeakable horrors perpetrated against the women and children of Germany as the allies and Red Army marched through their countries, or Eisenhower’s infamous Rhine Meadows (and very real) death camp. But none of you people have anything to say about any of that. Your outrage is reserved solely and explicitly for who you are told to be outraged on behalf of. It’s pathetic.

          • Jacob, a dozen thumbs up on this one. So few have studied both sides of this issue. Former German attorney Sylvia Stolz is currently on trial in Germany for giving a speech at a free speech conference in Switzerland in 2012 encouraging people to study both sides of this issue before declaring that a particular point of view is ‘TRUE’. Court proceedings were paused on January 3, 2018 when the ‘inquisitor’ saw Holocaust denier Monika Schaefer, a Canadian born woman of German parents and a leader in Canada’s Green Party, in the room. Monika was arrested and is being held in prison in Munich with no trial yet set for making a video in Canada apologizing to her mother for the fact that she had criticised her mother and those of her generation in Germany while Monika was growing up for not knowing that mass murders were supposedly taking place. In Germany it is against the law to even say or write that 6 million Jews were not gassed and incinerated in spite of the scientific fact that such would still be going on today to account for such numbers and the time taken to cremate such vast numbers without ovens to do so or secure facilities to accomplish such gassings. See the Leuchter Reports. No, Fred Leuchter is not ‘discredited’. He is a specialist in government executions who went to Auschwitz, took samples in the ‘gas’ rooms and determined that they were never used for such based on the scientific evidence found.

        • Wally Kumstayn, having been to Dachau, Auschwitz and Birkenau, I assure you the holocaust was VERY real. I suggest that in the future, you loosen the grip on your genitals, put down the men-on-men magazine and salute your fuhrer before commenting on an adults-only board.

          • >Makes crack about the alleged maturity level of a commenter.
            >Uses the childish “my ______ was there!” fallacy to try to frame his indignation in moral superiority.

            That people’s parents and grand parents liberated camps and saw emaciated people and found significant numbers of corpses has never been questioned. That there was ever a genocidal agenda to exterminate an entire group of people is what’s debated.

          • You’re fanticizing, again. Your oatmeal is getting cold and you still haven’t made your bed! Good luck in school and remember to look both ways before crossing the street. After you’ve outgrown your underoos and haver studied world history, you are welcome back to this forum. In the meantime, behave yourself and respect your elders!

          • Are you my elder? If so, I can assure you no personal disrespect to you is intended. But when you start out with a snippy and contentious tone with people you can expect a little tit for tat.

            I got a good chuckle out of your use of expressions. Some of which I’ve never heard before and am going to have to try to remember to use myself some time. 😀
            But by that same token I’ve got one for you, if you can’t handle a little verbal jousting online: Those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

          • Why not quit while you’re behind instead of digging even deeper into that hole you’re in? Give it up…you’re obviously tired…you even forgot (or didn’t know?!?) “grand parents” is one word, not two.

          • I had an aunt who also claimed the holocaust never happened. Her reasoning? “What did they do with all the ashes?!?” To her credit, she eventually wised up. I have no such hope for some of the brilliant (cough) minds here.

        • Obviously, you’ve never heard that it is better to remain silent and have your intelligence questioned, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. You are one special kind of stupid. By the way, how’s Beaver?

        • …I almost agreed with you…the only thing I didn’t understand…where were all my relatives…they disappeared at 1941-1944 in occupied Ukraine without any trace or mark…many tens…only my grandfather had 4 brothers and they had big families..nobody…seems UFO grabbed them and they live on Jupiter now…

    • it was actually Josef Goebels, Hitlers propaganda minister, who made the observation about repeating a lie often enough and loud enough it becomes the “truth”, I guess it really doesn’t matter the point remains the same.

      • The GOP and the right wing LOVE Goebels and they practice what he preached…did they check his license to teach?

        • I think you are VERY mistaken. Progressive Left & Hitler go hand in hand into fundamentally wanting to change society:

          Again mistaken: Hitler & Mussolini had beliefs rooted in Progressivism

          Not lastly but yet another mistake by you:

          • Spot on – Hitler manipulated media to spread lies about the jews & democrats/MSM spread vicious lies about Trump.

          • …and, guess who was an admirer of Mussolini? Good old FDR. They were basically running a mutual admiration society.

        • No, what we “deplorables” truly love is watching the crying, sobbing, blubbering, and pitching of hysterical hissy fits by the Furry Fruit Bats of the Left, in a repetitious demonstration of their “Electile Dysfunction” as they continuously lose major elections.

          After the 2018 elections, we will see more Democrooks get b|tch-slapped out of office. In 2020 we will see the re-election of President Trump to another 4 years of Making America Great.

          The Degenerate Douche Bucket Democrooks have no where to go but DOWN, because their so-called “leadership” is STILL marching their entire Cockeyed Collective straight down into the Tomb of Perpetual Political Irrelevancy, which is right where
          they all belong. The Democrooks are going to get CREAMED in 2018, and PRESIDENT Donald Trump will be re-elected by a landslide in 2020.

          The Furry Fruit Bats of the Left are going to become as extinct as the Dodo Birds that they remind all of us of. But before that inevitably happens, they are going to give us repeat performances of “Cry Me a River” in 2018 and in 2020.

          If today’s Whackadoodle Pervs of the Fakestream News, Hollywierd, and the Democrook Party are remembered at all, it will be as nothing more than Skid Marks on the underpants of history.

          Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish.

          We were forced to endure The Zero for 8 long years, so now it’s the Libtards’ turn to feel the same pain. Payback is a b|tch, ain’t it?

          • That’s a terrible thing to say about fruit bats. They’re noble animals, who help this world in innumerable ways.

          • I’m waiting for these bastards that are really communists that call themselves the code-word “progressive” to get the hell out of the USA. Lots of people willing to contribute to their one-way tickets to the communist country of their choice. Just more lies when they said they would leave.

        • Just what I’d expect someone who chooses the handle of “fuzzball” would come up with. Take a bow, fuzzy-wuzzy!

        • you’ve been drinking the progressive communist democrat kool-aid. This is the new era, we no longer let you liars spew your extremist left wing ideology. The democrat party was hijacked by the progressive communists for the express purpose of telling bullshit lies to Americans. Trump was elected because a huge number of Americans are wise to your bullshit.

          • WOW! Do you need to see a shrink. Not a word of what you say is true and you live in a fantasy world. Get some help, you need it!

      • Actually there were some qualifications that usually are left out. The quote consists of three sentences of which only the first is usually mentioned. The second and third sentences states what is needed for this to succeed.

        “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
        eventually come to believe it. The lie can
        be maintained only for such time
        as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
        and/or military consequences of the lie. It
        thus becomes vitally important for
        the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth
        is the mortal enemy of the lie, and
        thus by extension, the truth is the
        greatest enemy of the State.”

        • True, but progressive communist democrats have been telling lies with the same objective and republicans have allowed them to get away with it until Trump started actually calling them liars and FAKE.

    • No it was not Hitler. It’s a very old expression. He was referring to the fake & impossible Zionist propaganda about ‘gassing Jews’, etc.
      The ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
      see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:
      No name calling, level playing field debate here:

      The ‘holocaust’ storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that denies free speech and the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.

      Only liars demand censorship.

      • The Holocaust did happen. My Uncle was with Patton’s 2nd Armored Div and he saw the results and evidence.I am not censoring anyone . I am calling Deniers what they are ….liars.

        • Patton wrote in a letter to his wife near the end of WW2 that the US had supported the wrong side. He realized too late what the real endgame of that war was all about: the victory of Zionism over Europe. In the plan by Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi to so dilute European DNA that Europeans would never again be smart enough to challenge Marxist worldview lies, the recent massive immigration of lower IQ ‘immigrants’ and the plan to have them mix with Euriopeans to yield a mediocre mulatto race governmed by a more intelligent group of people. Study to learn who that is.. Patton was liquidated before he could begin speaking about what he came to understand. Diaries of an assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, recently revealed that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose Allied collusion with the Russians (Marxists-Zionists) that cost many American lives. The real murderer at the end of WW2, as Jacob noted above, was Gen. Eisenhower with his infamous Rhine Meadows death camps that starved more than 1 million German men at the end of WW2. He publicly stated his intense hatred for Germans. While he was a Zionist, he was apparently not Jewish. The two are not necessarily synonymous and a number of vocal Jewish rabbis, especially in London and New York, do not support Zionism.

  3. Psychiatry and Neurology have the same board, so she is not misrepresenting herself in that regard.

    She is licensed in New York, but not Connecticut. This is rather bizarre since she is a faculty member at Yale. She can’t see patients at Yale so it would be interesting what her role actually is with this private practice in NY.

    That being said, she is a completely unethical quack who destroyed her career on this issue. From now on, in every deposition, attorneys will rake her over the coals for diagnosing in absentia.

    • Explain how Psychiatry and Neurology having the same board is in any way relevant to her no longer holding current licenses in the state where she works? It’s easily checked, with the state of CT, medical license was issued in 2002 but “lapsed” in 2015 controlled substances early in 2017. Her bio indicates nothing about practicing medicine in NY, it simply lists that she “helped to” initiate reforms at New York City’s Rikers Island Correctional Center.

      Why don’t you look it up yourself?

  4. Naturally, Trump seems insane to the insane. They look at him and see someone foreign to their ways of living their lives and in their thought-processes. Which, must be closer to ‘null’ than, not. Libs need THEIR heads examined. Wonder if Obamacare covers that? Smh

    • Actually Obama Care does cover that They just dont cover those of us that are working unless we pay a major premium and a very large deductable. Libs get everything for free

      • No, “Libs” don’t get everything for free. working “libs”, and there are a lot of them, get screwed by “Obamacare” just like working conservatives do. Freeloaders get things free, regardless of their politics.

        • Well if the libs are getting screwed along with everyone else why did the stupid bastards vote these lowlifes into office in the first place. I have no sympathy for libs they are all stupid on purpose. This woman, what ever she is, is first and foremost a Communist and needs to go back to Chine where the government agrees with her way of doing things.

          • not by her self she need to take this fool with herThat check out this mother f***** his name is dinh-

            viet b**** him and his family they fled Vietnam

            that’s what I want to saythis Vietnamese so called

            American wrote The USA Patriot Act f****** treacherous

            gook bastard he took advantage of everything this

            country had to offer after America took him in and this

            is how he repay his adopted country by shitting on it

            according to the Vietnamese community they think he’s

            a hero for reaching the highest office of American

            government by being an Assistant Attorney General ,

            give me a f****** break. this mother f***** needs to be

            extradited back to Vietnam to stand trial and then the

            appropriate sentence carried out on under the

            Vietnamese law because it was illegal to leave Vietnam

            at the time his mother and the rest of his family’s

            fLED Vietnam in a boat you should think that he would

            fight for civil rights in this country since this gook

            He should be an advocate for prisoner rights and

            American’s rights since he had to flee to this country.

            He’s enjoyed great privilege attending Harvard and

            being Assistant Attorney General and now a Professor at

            Georgetown. Millions of American children have not been

            so privileged. Why would he think that others should be

            denied what he has achieved by harming folks liberties.
            motherfuker love freedom and democracy so much how come

            he hasn’t gone back to Vietnam?


            this m************ need to be activated

  5. I see this for just what it is, an attempt to SELL BOOKS, it is just fashionable to bash Trump so she just writes what she believes will sell then goes out and says things to get her name known and SELL BOOKS

    • Look Lala. She violated protocol, and that is enough to lose her license over, making her bogus, nevertheless. It like claiming Dr. Josef Mengele was a bonafide Doctor, and that would make you Hitler’s Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels. So crawl back into you oven!

        • Look snowflake hang around me and you’ll find yourself in something so hot that you will melt and run for a hot chocolate in your safe place Yo-yo brain! I’m not going to have a battle of wits with an unarmed man! Go back to yo mama Obama!

          • No thanks I’m too busy right now with your mama. I’d let her talk to you but she can’t right now as she has my dick in her mouth.

          • Well that certainly shows your amoral Democrat character for sure when you have to bring someone’s mother into the mix. I would ask how do you sleep at night but being a you are such a depraved individual with no conscious whatsoever I’ll have to forego that. However. I must say indeed you are the lowest type of scum there can be to have said that at all, but even more so that you admit to being a necrophiliac being as my mother has been dead for forty years. I wouldn’t doubt it if you were a pedophile as well you disgusting little snowflake!

          • How do I sleep at night? With the rotting corpse of your dead mother snowflake! Can’t take it? Don’t try to give it. She really likes it when I wear a white robe and poity hood and cut a hole for my cock.

      • So, she’s a liscenced psychiatrist, practicing and presenting psychiatric discovery? On a person she’s never met, interviewed or has as a patient? She should face the board and get liscence pulled then. She’s a fraud.

        • Is Viktor Orban or any other European nation leader-opponent of the EU being accused of being mentally disturbed? What about Iceland, Poland, Austria, Czech Republic or Bolivia that want Rothschild banker gangsters out of their country. These issues are tied well together. Is Jacob Rothschild dead or not? Rothschild family wants the one man standing in their way, out of their way, Donald Trump.

  6. Amazing cnn can still breathe with so much EGG ON THEIR marxist mugs. In their PATHOS to find dirt on Trump they are constantly doing this and it is constantly blowing up in their faces. SO FUNNY except that their tiny cadre of loyal viewers STILL believe all the BULLSHIT they broadcast.

  7. For breaking such “golden rule” of psychiatry, letting her license lapse, and basically bad mouthing the President. MAYBE SHE SHOULD SEE A FEW YEARS IN PRISON!!!! With a harsh reality check of $1,000,000 fine for her ignorance and poor judgement of Trump.

  8. No excuse. Zero. Yank her credentials and fire her. At what point, what will have to happen for the media in this country to show even a modicum of common sense. How could anyone float this poseur with no background check on her?

  9. Psychiatry is not an exact science. If you took the ‘clinical evaluation’ of a criminal defendant from 10 years ago that had been evaluated ‘on the clinical record’ by several psychiatrist(s) you would get different diagnosis but similatr findings based on which side paid for the evaluation. Now take that same clinical evaluation and request an evaluation paid for by the opposition and the results would surprise you. Same anonymous defendant, different results. Not much has changed in the way of studies (except by out of the mainstream practitioners whose result cannot be duplicated). Not a psychiatrist but I’m probably certifiable – lol.

  10. Yes, she has no license in Connecticut or California, except, she isn’t practicing in either of those states…

  11. Even if this woman did have a license to practice psychiatry the entire psychiatric community has in the past (when the Dems tried the same thing regarding Bush and Reagan) and will again today condemn such openly corrupt and fraudulent manner of making a diagnosis without even seeing the patient! But, lets al remember psychiatry isn’t a hard science based on empirical evidence to begin with, but based 99% on opinions and theories–and has been a favorite tool of tyrants, communists and radicals ever since it first arrived on the scene pretending to be a science!

  12. Mr. Dimitry, it is you that appears the fraud. Dr. Lee’s credentials are clear. She has an MD degree from Yale and did her residency at MGH. She is board certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. She has extensive credentials in her field. you know this. You are yammering on about points that are not germane to her credentials. That she allowed her license to practice to lapse simply means that she does not engage in active clinical practice. That does not invalidate her credentials. And she can reactivate her license any time she wishes. You also know this. No different than your not renewing your driving license means that you suddenly became incompetent to drive. This shiboleth of psychiatrists not making a diagnosis without formally examining the patient is a convention, not a law. And it does not preclude any citizen from forming an opinion. My opinion, not my “diagnosis” is that Mr. Trump clearly shows serious mental deficiency. regardless of whether you agree or disagree with his politics.

    You don’t further the causes of you champion by demonstrating your willingness to look stupid. It is one of the main techniques of charlatans and frauds to engage in ad hominem attacks, rather than stick to the point.

    And, one doesn’t need to be a psychiatrist to note that Mr. Trump clearly and alarmingly demonstrates the hallmarks of major organic brain disease. The most likely fit would be Alzheimer’s. But it could be something else. Pretending he has not demonstrated serious cognitive decline, language deterioration and personality change that fits with this diagnosis, does not advance the conservative cause. Space does not permit elaboration on these behavior changes. But I could. And so could you if you’d get back to the subject. Regardless of one’s political leanings, having such a seriously deficient person in the White House is a great danger for the country.

  13. I know, I know. You leftists REALLY, REALLY, REALLY wanted this to be true. Alas, your evil scheme has been thwarted again by the forces of good.

  14. Shame on these kind of people. Even if she treated a person, she would not be able to discuss that subject with an outsider. If I were Donald Trump I would sue her for defamation. It is a shame of all of the hate that is coming out. It is pure evil in a person’s heart to to degrade anyone.I, wonder what skeletons are in her closet!. We all have our faults but this one takes the cake, Donald Trump is not mentally unstable. it is all of the fake news that keeps this up with their lies, all because he won the election and they wanted their candidate to win. Journalism is not supposed to be biased but tell us what is happening in the world. Not running the President down every chance they get. Who knows, may-be the next president will be a real tyrant and all of us will be in a prison camp. But, if we are I hope they take the fake news people first.

  15. this will be her resume enhancement and she wil lget some prestigious tenured job at some shit hole elitist college out of it lol

  16. Not to mention that if she DID actually see him personally – she broke Doctor/Patient CONFIDENTIALITY. She can NEVER be trusted, by anyone.

  17. Well now, very awkward for the fake news morons that touted this as truth and cause for Trump’s impeachment. Come on now, these sore sport losing liberal morons in the fake news media just need to get over it already. Trump won, Hillary lost, Trump never colluded with anyone, Obama, Hillary, Comey, and Brennan were as corrupted as government officials can get, and Trump has done a great job so far, and we’ll be looking forward to the next 7 years of making America great again, so get over it already, move on.

  18. Dr. Bandy Lee is an internationally recognized expert on violence. Trained in medicine and psychiatry at Yale and Harvard Universities, and in medical anthropology as a fellow of the National Institute of Mental Health, she is currently on the faculty of Yale School of Medicine’s Law and Psychiatry Division. She served as Director of Research for the Center for the Study of Violence (Harvard, U. Penn., N.Y.U., and Yale), co-founded Yale’s Violence and Health Study Group (MacMillan Center for International Studies), and leads a project group for the World Health Organization’s Violence Prevention Alliance. She has consulted with the governments of Ireland and France, as well as California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New York on violence prevention programming in prisons and in the community. She played a key role in initiating reforms at Rikers Island, New York City’s correctional facility known for extreme levels of violence. She has been teaching students studying to be public defenders and to become asylum attorneys at Yale Law School since 2003, and a Global Health Studies course of her design, “Violence: Causes and Cures,” since 2013. She has served as consultant to the World Health Organization Violence and Injury Prevention department, UNESCO, and other United Nations bodies, and as speaker to the World Economic Forum. Her interests are in global health approaches to violence prevention and multisectoral collaboration. Sounds pretty qualified to me.

  19. Is there anyone in this ‘resistance’ movement who is not a liar, a fraud, a charlatan or simply deranged??

  20. May we now have an unlicensed “psychiatrist” give us the goods on the Furry Fruit Bat pedos of the Democrook Party? Let’s start with a long-distance “diagnosis” of The Hunchbacked Hildebeast.

    Dr. Bandy Lee is an internationally recognized expert on violence. Trained in medicine and psychiatry at Yale and Harvard Universities, and in medical anthropology as a fellow of the National Institute of Mental Health, she is currently on the faculty of Yale School of Medicine’s Law and Psychiatry Division. She served as Director of Research for the Center for the Study of Violence (Harvard, U. Penn., N.Y.U., and Yale), co-founded Yale’s Violence and Health Study Group (MacMillan Center for International Studies), and leads a project group for the World Health Organization’s Violence Prevention Alliance. She has consulted with the governments of Ireland and France, as well as California, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New York on violence prevention programming in prisons and in the community. She played a key role in initiating reforms at Rikers Island, New York City’s correctional facility known for extreme levels of violence. She has been teaching students studying to be public defenders and to become asylum attorneys at Yale Law School since 2003, and a Global Health Studies course of her design, “Violence: Causes and Cures,” since 2013. She has served as consultant to the World Health Organization Violence and Injury Prevention department, UNESCO, and other United Nations bodies, and as speaker to the World Economic Forum. Her interests are in global health approaches to violence prevention and multisectoral collaboration.

    MDiv Yale Divinity School (1995)
    MD Yale University School of Medicine (1994)
    Intern Bellevue Hospital Center
    Resident Massachusetts General Hospital
    Chief Resident Massachusetts General Hospital
    Research Fellow Harvard Medical School

    She doesn’t have a license to PRACTICE psychiatry–which means that she doesn’t have an office and see patients for a living. So what? She TEACHES. Another one of your phony stories.

  22. She’s not really a fraud. What the paperwork shows is that her licence has lapsed and is not valid. This means she can’t practice legally in the state in which she resides. She is still a psychiatrist by virtue of her training, and degree; so to say that she’s a fraud is not being honest.
    The only truly honest thing in this article is when it’s stated that she has no credibility in her assessment of the President, because she is NOT treating him, has not met him, has not had an opportunity to interview or examine him, and is not his doctor.

  23. What is wrong with journalists these days!? Journalism was a somewhat honest occupation, but it was many years ago.

  24. The contrast between conservatives upset with Obama and liberals upset with Trump could not be clearer. The responses (tea party activism versus ANTIFA violence) illustrates the truth about the character of these people. To whom can you trust to govern, is the question for the American public. If Trump and his administration abuse their positions then God help them. I’ll be right there condemning them and demanding criminal charges. But to continue to defend HRC and BO for the ghastly things that are emerging is reprehensible.

  25. By the way, the many ethical violations associated with this book are the exact reason this woman let her credentials expire. This way she avoids be censured or punished by the state’s medical association. Ethics are meaningless to some folks, even when they take oaths. Democrat or Republican, this type of overt cowardice should lead to ruin, not profit.

  26. Look at that fake doctors eyes! She needs to be evaluated herself, because from her actions and mental attitude, she has some serious baggage. Course, the godless Democrats will lap up any vomit tossed in front of them if it shows hate for our Nation and President. I doubt if the entire godless Democratic Communist Party could pass a mental evaluation, and I know that Maxine Waters, John Lewis, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Elijah Cummings would not pass, in fact, they would probably order straight jackets for those mentally sick fools. MAGA!

  27. That should probably disqualify her from ever getting her license… She broke not only the profession’s ethics laws, but also criminal and civil law. Maybe some jail time is in order for her.

    • That’s the American Psychoanalytic Association or APsaA, not the American Psychological Association or APA. The APsaA is a hard left leaning association, any group willing to waive long standing ethical practices so that they can attack a politician who they disagree with has no real credibility. Think I’ll stick with the APA who doesn’t bend their rules to suit their politics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.