Supreme Court To Make Landmark Ruling On ‘Voiding The Election’

Fact checked
A lawsuit filed to rule the election result null and void and declare Trump an illegitimate president has made it to the Supreme Court.

A lawsuit filed to rule the election result null and void and declare President Trump an illegitimate president has made it all the way to the Supreme Court.

The ‘Void The Election’ case, as it is known in legal circles, was filed by three Massachusetts women, Diane Blumstein, Nancy Goodman, and Donna Soodalter-Toman, and has been heard by a Supreme Court Justice. It is now on the docket and awaiting response by the defendants.

While the suit is being presented as a miraculous, grassroots push by the three women against all odds, it actually represents the latest attempt by the elite to overturn the result of the election and suggests the Democratic party and Hillary Clinton have still not accepted the loss.

We decided to file suit to nullify the election and we consulted with constitutional lawyers, cyber security folks, the CIA,” the group stated in a letter. “They told us that yes the Russians hacked the elections but we would not be able to formulate a plan and get and a writ to court. We did. We were told the federal district court would not hear it. They did.

They not only heart it, they…expedited our path. We were told we could not get it to the Supreme Court. We did. We were told we could not get it heard by a Justice. We did. Twice.”

Against all odds and the predictions of many, our case #16-907, awaits the Supreme Court’s hearing.

The plaintiffs believe the election must be held all over again, in the interests of fairness.

Describing the court case as a “legal and peaceful way to solve our problem“, the letter also states “we need to connect with big name celebrities ASAP.”

However opponents of the suit claim that it is an attempt to “create a civil war.

Do you want civil war?” a Twitter user asked. “This is how you create a civil war.”

The Supreme Court case is the latest attempt by the elite to overturn the result of a free and fair election. They waged a six-week campaign behind the scenes attempting to convince Republican electors not to vote for Donald Trump and confirm him as President. That failed – embarrassingly – after Hillary Clinton actually lost more electors than Donald Trump, and the most by any presidential candidate in over a century.

Then outgoing President Obama and DHS Chief Jeh Johnson tried to seize control of the election system in America by illegally federalizing it, attempting to give themselves the legal right to overturn the result. That also failed.

Massive, Soros funded protests heaved across the nation, attempting to portray Trump as an illegitimate president. And mainstream media has worked overtime attempting to smear the President in any way possible, even with fake news – most notably the unverified dossier published by BuzzFeed and instantly jumped on by CNN in a desperate attempt to destabilize the new administration.

Now we have the Supreme Court case, the last dangerous roll of the dice for the elite who have refused to change their platform and would love to hold new elections and resurrect their mascot Clinton.

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Baxter Dmitry


    • fake news

      there is a petition with the same number and names on the court docket for the supreme court,, but it is a litigation about some coastal boundary in California not the President

      • I went to the site and your failing to tell people that they have to click on “Original No 5 United States V. California.
        You need to make clear to git rid of the troll.

  1. Can’t tell how the supremes will vote nowadays. I would hate to see an all out civil war in this,nation. It’s what the leftists want. They pervert our laws and our freedoms using them against us. It will be intersting to say the least, watching this unfold.

    • This is the price that we pay from liberals who say the Russians were interfering with our democracy as they plot to over throw our President, war is coming.

      • there is a petition with the same number and names on the court docket for the supreme court,, but it is a litigation about some coastal boundary in California not the President

    • Not really. They are scared of a civil war, and have no desire for one… or they would not be so intent in trying to take our guns away for decades.
      Civil War…they would lose and they know they would

    • The lefties need to be careful what they wish for, they have proven there lack of worth with riots and beatings of innocent people, they are cowards in lopsided numbers.
      When the time comes they will be dealt with in a one on one manner of which they never imagined possible in their deeply cowardly world.

  2. I think this is FALSE. They are not deciding on the 2016 Election. That would be false news, fake, fraudulent news.

        • I looked at the Supreme Court website, and found it and opened up the petition and read it and it says something completely different then the post about it being to remove President Trump

          its real look it up 16-907 at… it is about land not the President This joint motion relates to past litigation concerning the State of California’s seaward boundary for purposes of the Submerged Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. 130

          • Then why was it filed in Massachusetts … and why are you not providing a link to this California case, referencing it by name only and linking to the Supreme Court docket itself? I’d like to hear your point but you’re providing us no information

  3. If this insanity is pulled off somehow their won’t be a civil war, there will be a purging of all things evil that have plagued the last “bastion of freedom” for the past 75 years.

    • there is an petition with the same number at the supreme court petitioned by the same people but it is about the litigation concerning the state of California seaward boundary so this was and is FAKE NEWS

    • The Illuminati’s Luciferian takeover , including all current events, was planned a long time ago. Commander William Guy Carr, “Pawns in the Game” 1958:. NWO Luciferians play by the Illuminati Protocols; “Might not Right”, not rules. Lies and mind control are essential tools in the agenda:

      “World War Three is to be fomented by using the differences the agentur of the Illuminati stir up between Political Zionists and the leaders of the Moslem world. The war is to be directed in such a manner that Islam (the Arab World including Mohammedanism) and Political Zionism
      (including the State of Israel) will destroy themselves while at the same time the remaining nations, once more divided against each other on this issue, will be forced to fight themselves into a state of complete exhaustion physically, mentally, spiritually and economically. Can any unbiased and reasoning person deny that the intrigue now going on in the Near, Middle, and Far East isn’t designed to accomplish this devilish purpose ?
      On August 15, 1871, Pike told Mazzini that after World War Three is ended, those who aspire to undisputed world domination will provoke the greatest social cataclysm the world has ever known. We quote his own written words (taken from the letter catalogued in the British
      Museum Library, London, Eng.) :
      “We shall unleash the Nihilists and Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will be from that moment without compass (direction), anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer brought finally out in the public view, a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”

    • We’ll bring back the GUILLOTINE and there’s a place in line for Soros behind Clintons and Obamr and so and so…fun times are comin

  4. I sure am glad all Americans are armed and ready. There are a lot of people who have no clue as to the will of freedom loving patriots.

    • Was out shooting the pistol and rifle yesterday!!!!!

      Cant be too prepared to take the fight for freedom to the door of the evil one!!!

  5. So they consulted with the CIA? that same CIA complicit in covering up sex trafficking over the last 20 years.. NICE move ladies.. you’re class act dimwits

  6. If this is true, and I think it is, all that will be needed is for John Roberts to make a ruling and he will have to rule against the women, lawyers, and CIA. The election is over and he swore in Donald Trump, The only way to ensure that Donald Trump is removed ASAP is to kill him and maybe Mike Pence too in order to ensure that Paul Ryan is the President. Then he will be killed off after Hillary is confirmed as his Vice President.

    Memo to any member of the FBI and Secret Service that reads this comment, I am personally not calling for the murder of anybody.

  7. Total crap. Proceed at your own risk. Any attempt to void the election of the duly elected president under these bogus claims is high treason.

  8. You don’t get to the supreme court unless you have exhausted all your appeals. And than only of the supremes decide to hear it. The process to get in front of the supreme Court takes years, not weeks. These clucks no where near getting a writ of certori. This is fake news and the writer should be slapped. “The not only heart (sic) it, they expedited our path” jeez, can’t you idiots even use a spell checker for your fake news?

  9. How can an allegation that the Russian’s “hacked” be allowed as “evidence”. Even if they used the CIA Report, the rules of evidence require that it be introduced by someone familiar with the production of the report (like the author), unless there is an consent by the opposing party to allow it as evidence. Would Trump consent without allowing lawyers to question the validity of the (fake) report? That any court would accept hearsay as evidence is mind boggling.

    • the CIA, NSA, and FBI; have all come out agreeing that the Russians interfered in our election..and the the proof has already been shown to both the Senate and the House. This is not a bunch of whackos coming up with this.. our own law enforcement, and other agencies that have no political agenda are backing this also,

      • There is not one shred of evidence contained in the intelligence agencies reports. It is all conjecture using catch words like “confident”, “highly likely” and other meaningless terms. All intelligence agencies have political agendas – the one to keep them in business by creating hysteria.

  10. Sounds like they are using the only avenues they have since Russia and Putin got involved in our somewhat Free elections. No complaints about DeVos buying her spot?

  11. The author is obviously a right wing hack and Trump puppet. The election should be nullified and held again, w/o the electoral college. Hillary will win AGAIN, by a landslide and the country will be saved from this orange walking disaster.

  12. These videos and articles being produced by far-left extremists attacking all Democrats as, “the establishment too disconnected from the working people,” is an insult to us [the people] personally. These Democrats have done more throughout their careers, than U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders has throughout his entire 35 long years as an establishment politician. Which, none can name any mentionable “revolutionary change” implemented by Sanders, which he speaks about ad nauseam.

    If we do not stand up for our leaders who have dedicated their lives in service to us, not all, but many who are under attack by false leftist “purity;” then the far-left will continue to divide our party and the left in general. We will be worse off in 2018, 2020, and beyond, than we ever were in 2016. Republicans will only become stronger [the exact desired outcome of this assault]. These extremists are driving us into a bleak future with their irrational demands, inept logic and reasoning, and refusal to acknowledge facts, only wishing to steer by emotion.

    I’m not saying many do not have great ideas, even Bernie. However, their bullying tactics to demand everything, and demand it “NOW,” is not how you govern 320 million individuals. All while refusing to collaborate or compromise. They have no desire to work with us, or our elected officials, they want to completely take over the Democratic Party. That cannot happen. They do not get to demand a seat at the table by forcing everyone, anyone, they wish to falsely label as “establishment” to vacate their seat. Either have a seat with us, or elsewhere.

    Hillary Clinton is not the establishment. She has dedicated her life to public service, has more accomplishments, incomparable to most, and is one of our greatest politicians of all time. She has a proven record based on fact and action, not rhetoric. She ran a 38 plus point platform that was inclusive to every single American citizen on the left, and to those on the right. Thirty-eight policy proposals spelled out in over 125,000 words, compared to Trump’s seven policies and just over 9,000 words; of which most were repetitive soundbites and catch phrases. We know them well, “build the wall” and “make America great again”. We all knew, and know where that is heading. Bernie on the other hand, not Clinton, was the flawed candidate. Opportunistic in every sense and incompetent to the point of embarrassment for someone with a career of 35 years in an elected public office.

    For those who call themselves “progressives and liberals” that wish to work with us, instead of attacking us, we should welcome them. For those who only wish to be divisive and destructive, we cannot afford to even entertain their irrational demands. The next four years will be a dark stain on our country’s history. If we do not demand the truth, the facts, and allow ourselves to succumb to extremism breeding on the left; we will continue to fail. We will find ourselves in a nationalistic theocracy, ruled by fascism.

    Those who refused to vote, voted third party, etc., are now watching all our progress being eroded in a single day. They are outraged over women’s rights; civil rights; LGBT rights; immigration; healthcare; responsible gun legislation; climate change; education/student debt; minimum wage; Flint, Michigan; Standing Rock; the Supreme Court; ethics; corruption; obstructionism; demagoguery; tyranny; etc. However, if they all would have meant their feel-good slogan of “#USNotMe, we would not be in this position.

    *Make no mistake, there is and will be from here on out, right-wing propagandists, even foreign influence trying to dictate the divide in hopes of growing nationalism and fascism. By an onslaught of trolls, fake news, and every means possible. Just as Russia has done in England [Brexit], recently here in the US [our election], now Germany [with their upcoming election], and all across the globe. This is not just the work of far-left fanatics, they are also being influenced unwillingly, unknowingly, and some even refusing to admit, by outside opposition.

    We have two years; not even. We must unite together for the greater good of our nation, and root ourselves back in reality. Not for the greater good of singular individuals, or groups, or issues. For all of us. It truly should be about “us, not me,” but we have to mean it and live by it. That will progress us towards Equality. Some will feel left out on the journey from time to time, as not everything will be resolved instantaneously. However, we will keep advocating these issues until they are resolved. Not overnight, not under one President, but together we can get there. Yes we can! Yes we will! #DemandTheTruth #FactsOnly #StrongerTogether

    • NowThisElection shared a video of #Republicans praising #BernieSanders for his “honesty”.

      That’s suspicious… until you research his hypocritical and contradictory record:

      -Voting for the same crime bill he attacks Hillary on, who did not have a vote.
      -The fact he voted against immigration reform.
      -Voted against same-sex marriage equality until fully supporting in 2009. As Mayor of Burlington, he signed off on an evangelical-led ‘We Believe in Marriage Week’ in 1982 – defining marriage as between a husband and wife.
      -Voted for the Commodity Futures Modernization Act.
      -Voted against auditing the Federal Reserve Bank.
      -Voted against Amber Alerts.
      -Voted against the Brady Bill five times.
      -Voted against CDC research on gun violence.
      -The fact that the NRA helped finance Bernie’s re-election campaign in Vermont.
      -Voted to dump nuclear waste in Sierra Blanca, Texas and Barnwell, South Carolina.
      -Jane Sanders sits on and profits from the Compact Commission that oversees the transfer of nuclear waste from Vermont to other states.
      -Voted for countless acts of war, including the bills that set up and financed the Iraq war (HR 1585) and continued financing (HR 4613, HR 563, HR 2863). Later approved increased troop deployments (HR 2647) that Hillary voted against. Approved of the summer long assault against Gaza (S 498). Voted for regime change in Libya (S Res. 85) . Bosnia troop deployment resolution (H Res 247). Voted for Iraqi Liberation Act (Saddam Hussein regime change) in 1998 (Hr 4655 and H J Res 114). Approves of air strikes against ISIS, etc. etc. etc.
      -Voted against the closure of Guantanamo Bay.
      -Voted YES on continuing intelligence gathering without civil oversight (HR 5020).
      -Has 6 SuperPACs backing his campaign (that we know of), of which 3 are GOP SuperPACs.
      -Implies Hillary has control over the SuperPACs backing her campaign, which is factually false and illegal for a campaign to coordinate with a SuperPAC. Same with those supporting Bernie’s campaign. A candidate has no control over SuperPACs, they are free to endorse and support any candidate they choose, even multiple.
      -The fact he does take corporate contributions and he has received millions from all the entities/and employees he attacks Hillary for.
      -Has been cited for campaign contribution violations three times by the FEC.
      -Claims endorsements that actually endorsed Hillary.
      -Bernie’s campaign has stolen campaign data from Hillary.
      -Filed a frivolous lawsuit against the DNC over the theft of data his campaign stole, which he admitted to and fired his campaign staffers involved; illegally broke the DNC rules and campaign laws.
      -Bernie’s campaign staff illegally posed as union workers in Nevada.
      -Inflates caucuses.
      -Wrote a rape fantasy essay.
      -Claims Donald Trump’s remarks on abortion and punishing women is a distraction from “real issues”.
      -Bernie claims to have a more progressive record advocating LGBT and Womens Rights, actual record and accomplishments prove otherwise, Hillary Clinton is more accomplished on both accounts.
      -Claims the Human Right’s Campaign and Planned Parenthood, even civil rights hero’s like Congressman John Lewis are the “establishment”.
      -Claims to poll better against GOP candidates than Hillary, rates claim as False.
      -Claims Hillary would lose to Donald Trump in the general election, shows this claim to be false by all reputable polls (over 20).
      -Claims he is the “People’s Choice” while Hillary is ahead in the popular vote by 3 MILLION votes.
      -Rails against Superdelegates as “establishment corruption,” in which his top advisor Tad Devine was the architect of the very Superdelegate system in the early 1980’s, then claims he will win by “persuading”/stealing said Superdelegates from Hillary.
      -Tad Devine also represented Monsanto, Phillip Morris, Pfizer, Verizon, Microsoft, as their attorney.
      -Pays his wife Jane Sanders YUGE for her work/role in campaign, while refusing to release tax returns as everything is in Jane’s name, not his.
      -Claims Hillary is dishonest, yet cannot provide a single example; has rated Hillary Clinton most honest candidate among all presidential hopefuls in 2016, including Bernie Sanders.
      -Claims Hillary is an establishment politician, while he has been in elected office for a total of 35 years, Hillary only 12.
      -Claims to be a candidate running on progressive, revolutionary change, however, throughout Bernie’s 35 long years in office there is no instance of revolutionary change. (And somehow he believes 35 years was not enough time to accomplish any of his current grandiose proposals, and believes he will be able to implement all of them in a short span of 4-8 years.)
      -Continuously references Denmark as an exemplary model for his proposals, yet Danes and the Danish Prime Minister reject his comparisons.
      -Grotesquely understates the cost of his proposals, as shown by all economists not directly involved in or sought out by the Sanders campaign.
      -Claims to be running a positive campaign, though is not.
      -Has a campaign that is fueled by hypocrisy and manipulation.
      -Uses regurgitated Republican propaganda, misinformation, and blatant lies as a campaign tactic against Hillary Clinton.

      Yes, Bernie is real “honest, transparent, and sincere!”

      Not to mention, when you have a horde of dishonest Republicans endorsing you, praising your “honesty,” it seems very disingenuous. LMAO. Every “liberal and progressive” commenting in the comment section of the above video, cheering their praise, has attacked each and every one of these Republicans as obstructionists, extremists, and terrorists. Though, of course, since it is praise towards Bernie Sanders they think these endorsements are “honorable.” Imagine for a moment what these same “liberals and progressives” would be saying and claiming if all these same Republicans praised- #HillaryClinton.

      Revolution? I want no part of this “revolution”.

  13. So how is it a free and fair election when both the CIA & FBI claim that Russia interfered on Trump’s behalf?!! If you’re ok with foreign intervention in our “free and fair” election, then it’s time for you to turn in your patriot card because you are NOT one.

  14. The elite are running this country right now! What is wrong with you people? It doesn’t get any more elitist than Donald Trump and his band of merry billionaires.


  16. It is funny (delusional) how this author assumes we would vote for Clinton and not Bernie.

  17. If this election is null and void, who would be president? Would it go back to Obama until another election or would the rightful winner, Hillary Clinton, take the oath if office? I do know, that the world would only accept one of those two. Hillary Clinton has a relationship with the world and has had it for many years and has the ability to save the face of America. Even with all the hacking, cheating, and everything else that Trump has done, Hillary Clinton still won by 3 million votes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.