Zelensky Boasts US Will ‘Definitely’ Keep Sending Billions To Ukraine No Matter Who Wins Election

Fact checked by The People's Voice Community

The US will continue sending billions to Ukraine regardless of who sits in the White House, in the same manner as Washington supports Israel, according Ukrainian President Voldymyr Zelensky.

A potential leadership change in the White House would not affect that commitment, the Ukrainian leader insisted.

During an interview with the 1+1 TV channel on Sunday, Zelensky outlined the security guarantees that Ukraine is seeking from the US and its allies on its “path to NATO.” Leaders of the US-led military bloc failed to offer Ukraine a roadmap to membership at a summit in Lithuania last month, although G7 nations promised continued assistance.

“We will definitely have an Israeli model, the one which has weapons, technologies, training, funding, etc,” Zelensky said.

Israel has been easily the largest recipient of US foreign aid since World War II, although annual allocations for Ukraine have surpassed those offered to West Jerusalem since hostilities between Moscow and Kiev erupted last year.

Israel is not part of NATO, meaning members of the bloc are not legally obliged to come to its defense in the event of attack. Washington, however, has described its commitments to Israeli security as “iron-clad.”

When asked by interviewer Natalia Moseichuk if Western security guarantees to Ukraine would survive a possible change of leadership in Washington, Zelensky was adamant that they would.

“Those are things that are voted for in the [US] Congress,” he said, adding that similar agreements with European countries would likewise be ratified by their national legislatures.

Leadership changes in the US have previously resulted in Washington abandoning international commitments. The administration of former President Donald Trump infamously pulled out of the JCPOA, an international agreement on Iran’s nuclear industry, which was widely considered a major diplomatic achievement under Trump’s predecessor, Barack Obama.

Western media have suggested in recent weeks that the US will not sustain its current level of support for Kiev next year, when Democratic leader Biden will be fighting for a second presidential term. Several Republican candidates have called for aid to Ukraine to be scrapped altogether, or at least reduced and subjected to stronger scrutiny. The list of critics includes Trump, who currently leads the race for the Republican nomination, according to opinion polls.

Baxter Dmitry
About Baxter Dmitry 5943 Articles
Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.

4 Comments

  1. Zelensky promised Peace with Russia. Look what happened when Zelensky rolled 200,000 Ukraine Troops up to the Donbas border to attack and murder Russians in Ukraine.

    Germany holds Elections in 2024. Watch a pro-Peace with Russia majority being elected ending Zelensky’s term in office.

  2. Russia is one 6 th of the world’s land mass and is worth zillions .That’s what they want as the Jewel in their Crown .They don’t give a crap about Ukraine or Ukrainians really but they want Russia for ever and ever Amon .And it isn’t for sale so wars the only way .Imo .

  3. IF it’s out of their own pockets, NOT Ours.

    Relating to Violations of the United States Constitution

    This Also Includes The Alleged Debt We Owe China – Trading With Our Enemies Is ‘Aiding & Abetting’ THUS TREASON – This, among other things were set into place to bring US to where We ARE Today – “Out Of Stock” & Depopulation…

    PUBLIC DEBT

    WE THE FREE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, by and through the Unalienable, Individual Rights Guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States of America, hereby Petition the President of the United States and the members of the House of Representatives and Senate of the United States Congress for Redress of our Grievances, to Honor their Oaths or Affirmations of Office and their Constitutional Obligations by responding to this Petition within forty (40) days, providing a formal acknowledgement of its receipt with a rebuttal of its legal arguments and statement of facts, or demonstrating a good faith effort to comply with its remedial instructions.

    WHEREAS, by the terms and conditions of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution for the United States of America, We the People have expressly established a Republican Form of Government, empowering it to act only in certain ways, while purposely and patently restricting and prohibiting it from acting in certain other ways without Amendment, and

    WHEREAS, the public debt is having a devastating, adverse impact on America’s economy and is contributing to the pauperization of Her People, and; WHEREAS, We the People are Entitled, By Right, to public debt that is Constitutionally valid, and;

    WHEREAS, a portion of the debt of the United States was incurred in violation of the principle of Enumerated Powers, and in violation of Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 and Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 of the Constitution for the United States of America, and

    WHEREAS, the First and Ninth Amendments to the Bill of Rights Guarantees to every American the Unalienable Right to hold the government (public servants) accountable to each and every principle, prohibition, restriction and mandate of The Declaration of Independence And Constitution for the United States of America, NOW THEREFORE:

    WE THE PEOPLE hereby seek the following Remedies and Instruct the President and the members of Congress to respond to this First Amendment Petition for Redress of Grievances as follows:

    1. Within forty (40) days following the service of this First Amendment Petition for Redress, the Congress of the United States, in the exercise of its power authorized by Article I, Section 7, Clause 1 of the Constitution for the United States of America, to originate “all bills for raising Revenue” and in the exercise of its power authorized by Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution for the United States of America “To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts…,” and in recognition of the prohibition in Article I, Section 9, Clause 6 of the Constitution for the United States of America that “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law,” and in recognition of the principle of “Enumerated Powers,” shall enact a statute:

    (a) establishing a National Advisory Commission on the validity of the Public Debt,
    and;
    (b) calling upon each of the several States to establish their own State Advisory Commission on the validity of the Public Debt, and;

    2. That the sole purpose of the said Advisory Commissions shall be to study, determine and quantify which part of the public debt is void and/or voidable under two principles of law, namely:

    (i) Under the doctrine of the Supreme Court’s decision in Craig v. Missouri, 29 U.S. (4 Peters) 410 (1830), all contracts, agreements, or other arrangements in which any part of the consideration consists or consisted of the emission of unconstitutional “bills of credit” through or under the auspices of any Federal Reserve Bank, “member bank,” or “depositary institution” within the (privately owned) Federal Reserve System are void ab initio and unenforceable in any court of Law of the United States or of any State, and;

    (ii) All alleged “public debts” of the United States, howsoever made and in whatever form, that have been incurred for the purpose of raising revenue to be expended from the general fund of the Treasury in payment of costs arising under a particular budget of the United States are void ab initio and unenforceable in any court of Law in the United States or of any State in the same percentage that the Unconstitutional programs, activities, or expenditures in that budget bear to the total programs, activities, or expenditures therein.

    Furthermore, every lender is legally presumed to know, and must bear full and individual responsibility for, prior to such lending, having performed adequate due diligence and challenging, where appropriate, the intended use of such funds and the Constitutional Limits regarding the bona fide, lawful expenditures of money the general government borrows, to the same extent that every official of such government knows and is bound by Law and the Constitution to those same limitations and restrictions of public use, and;

    Specially, if a lender extends a loan to public officials, knowing that his loan will be used for Unconstitutional purposes, or with willful blindness, reckless disregard or negligence regarding the Unconstitutionality of those purposes, the lender has thereby established himself as a participant in a fraud against the American People.

    For the repayment of the fraudulent portions of such loans, there is NO LAWFUL RECOURSE, and the American People cannot be held liable for such repayment in any court of Law.

    3. That said Advisory Commission shall be made up of persons selected by a Committee composed of: Dr. Edwin Vieira, Dr. Lawrence M. Parks, Judge Andrew Napolitano, G. Edward Griffin, Ronald Mann and William Bergman, and;

    4. That, within ninety (90) days from the effective date of the said statute, the National Advisory Commission shall submit to Congress a report containing complete and specific drafts of all such legislation as may be necessary and proper for Congress to enact in order to achieve the goals set out in Paragraph 2, ante, for the Government of the United States, and;

    5. That, within sixty (60) days of its receipt of the National Advisory Commission’s report pursuant to Paragraph 5, ante, Congress shall enact such legislation as will achieve the goals set out in Paragraph 2, ante, for the Government of the United States, and;

    6. The President shall cooperate with and assist the Congress and the National Advisory
    Commission in the performance of Paragraphs 1-5 above.

    The Supreme Court Committed Treason when they ruled Our Public servants do not have to respond to Our First Amendment Petitions of Grievances That Hold them Accountable.

    ALSO: Selling Our Land To Our Enemies IS A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT AND TREASON.

    The Authority We, The People LENT To Our Public servants To Serve US CONSTITUTIONALLY IS NULL & VOID DUE TO their TREASON – DO NOT OBEY YOUR ENEMY – YOU KNOW their agenda – they ARE THE NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT TO OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AND TO US PERSONALLY.

    • Regardless they made that judgement which you know they did invalidating all of that old stuff .And you know they always say everyone has to obey the rule of law ..Now what you don’t understand it seems is that Americans lost their government when they lost Common Law .Certain people are working hard to try to wake Americans up to the fact that they can restore it by using their Sheriff’s Office , bit they’re fighting a losing battle because most Americans are too stupid and to lazy and too apathetic to do anything but whine .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.