The FDA is quietly planning to replace most salt in America with a new synthetic ‘salt substitute’ produced by Bill Gates that will be laced with mRNA chemicals.
According to reports, the FDA is now advocating for a transition from traditional salt to Bill Gates’ fake salt, as outlined in their proposal, “Use of Salt Substitutes to Reduce the Sodium Content in Standardized Foods.”
The fake salt companies, such as Nu-Salt or Morton’s, are both funded by Bill Gates. These dangerous substitutes typically employ potassium chloride, MSG and other dangerous chemicals to mimic the flavor of real salt.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
In a collaborative letter dated August 8th, leading health organizations, including the American Association of Kidney Patients (AAKP), Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, and National Kidney Foundation (NKF), raised serious and urgent concerns over the FDA’s recent proposition to use Gates’ potassium-based fake salt substitutes in standardized foods.
Theepochtimes.com reports: The concerns revolve around the potential health risks to the 37 million Americans diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Many CKD patients, they note, are unable to adequately process excess potassium, making them susceptible to hyperkalemia, a dangerous condition that can lead to severe cardiac complications, and even sudden death.
While these organizations laud the FDA’s efforts to mitigate the high sodium consumption among Americans, they stress the need for a more cautious approach. The letter pointedly highlights that adding “hidden potassium” in foods, especially without clear labeling, could inadvertently imperil a significant portion of the population.
Potassium, crucial for muscle contraction, especially in the heart, must be carefully balanced. When this balance is disrupted, it can cause muscle malfunction, including in the heart. While kidneys manage about 80 percent of the potassium we consume, other organs like the adrenal glands and pancreas and many medications can also affect potassium levels.
Dr. Stephen Z. Fadem, Chair of AAKP’s Medical Advisory Board and Clinical Professor of Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, cautions against unchecked potassium in food products. “If potassium is indiscriminately added to foods, it will result in many patients ingesting more than their body can handle. This is ill-advised and against the US FDA’s mission of shepherding safe and effective care,” he told Epoch Times.
The letter further warns that the dangers extend beyond those with kidney disease. “Other populations vulnerable to excessive potassium and associated health risks, because they too are unable to normally excrete it, include those with heart failure, diabetes, adrenal insufficiency, and those taking medications that impair potassium excretion.”
The letter strongly urges the FDA to pivot towards alternate strategies in light of these potential health ramifications. This could include developing non-potassium-based flavor enhancers, intensifying public health education about safe sodium reduction, or enhancing food labeling. The collective plea underscores the need for both public safety and transparent communication in any forthcoming regulatory changes.
Paul Conway, Chair of Policy and Global Affairs for the AAKP highlighted the significant impacts of kidney disease on patients and the economy.
“Kidney disease is a healthcare and workforce issue because of the amount of disability it can create. Beyond the personal toll on patients and their families, it’s a financial strain, costing America $130 billion a year for kidney care. This figure doesn’t even account for the repercussions of disability, job loss, and unemployment due to the disease,” Conway told The Epoch Times.
Conway also took issue with the FDA’s approach to formulating its proposal, noting that crucial organizations, like his own, were sidelined from the outset, leading to a policy with unintended consequences.
“We should have been at the forefront of this policy. If you release regulations for public comment and are met with surprise feedback, you’ve gone about it wrong. We don’t always weigh in on such matters. When we do, our voice carries significant weight due to the severity of the disease we address and its associated mortality rates,” he shared.
Attempts by The Epoch Times to contact prominent health organizations, including the American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology, for their stance have yet to yield responses.
The Great Salt Debate
Salt, essential for our bodily functions, has long been a topic of debate among health experts.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) brought salt into sharp focus in 2001 with the DASH-sodium study, suggesting a connection between reduced sodium consumption and decreased blood pressure, leading to its cautionary positioning in America’s dietary guidelines.
Despite significant investments in research, definitive evidence remains hard to come by. The central question revolves around whether prolonged high salt intake, culminating in hypertension, ultimately escalates to graver health complications.
In a comprehensive study of over 28,000 high-risk individuals, researchers found a nuanced relationship between sodium and heart health. Elevated sodium levels were linked to a rise in cardiovascular risks, yet surprisingly, very low intakes were associated with an increased likelihood of cardiovascular mortality.
Adding complexity, a 2023 investigation revealed that heart failure patients consuming under 2.5 grams of sodium daily faced an 80 percent heightened mortality risk compared to their counterparts.
Anirudh Palicherla, MD, of Creighton University School of Medicine and the study’s lead researcher, stated, “Our findings showed that restricting dietary sodium below recommended levels was counterproductive in managing heart failure.” He further noted the importance of identifying a safe sodium consumption level.
Dr. Andrew Huberman, a distinguished neurobiology professor at Stanford University School of Medicine, highlights sodium’s pivotal role in cognitive and physical well-being. ‘I want to emphasize the possibility, that for some people, more salt might help them in terms of health, cognitive, and bodily functioning, and for other people, less salt is going to be better,” he commented in a recent podcast episode.
It’s worth noting that not all salt is created equal, recent research suggests. In a Stanford University study, rats fed natural sea salt displayed consistently lower blood pressure and fewer cardiac and kidney issues than their counterparts on refined salt, suggesting natural salts may have health benefits over their refined counterparts.
A Medical Perspective: Health Professional Weigh In
The call to cut sodium has sparked a spectrum of medical opinions. While many in the health care realm view this as an important step toward bolstering public health, the lurking hazards of high salt consumption remain ever-present.
“Lowering salt intake carries significant public health advantages, especially in reducing average blood pressure,” Dr. Richard J. Solomon, the Medical Director of Nephrology at the University of Vermont Medical Center, told The Epoch Times.
He underscores the urgent need for precise product labeling and robust public education. Solomon believes labels should indicate when foods contain potassium chloride—an essential warning for those with kidney issues. He advises the public to ‘consult with a physician’ before reaching for products laden with salt substitutes.
Nephrology specialist and dietician Desiree De Waal emphasizes the importance of clear labeling, akin to “added sugars.” However, she highlights pitfalls in potassium labeling. A label like “good source of potassium” aids those with kidney ailments, but poses risks for the unaware.
“Those uninformed of their kidney disease risk hyperkalemia, which can lead to cardiac arrest. I’ve seen many patients misled by this, with dangerously high potassium levels resulting in hospitalizations,” De Waal told The Epoch Times.
De Waal expressed concerns over the long-term risks food additives, especially harmful preservatives like phosphorus additives. She also critiqued societal salt inclinations, remarking, “We need to focus on herbs and spices. Our salt-centric society has lost the authentic taste of food,” she said.
Amid ongoing debates on salt substitutes, Dr. Fadem suggests a return to basics.
“People who eat more fresh foods will not only be healthier but will not have to rely on salt substitutes for flavor.”
This viewpoint underscores the idea that a return to natural, unprocessed foods may hold the key to navigating the contemporary salt dilemma—as well as the many health concerns tied to diets high in process and ultra-processed foods.
