Judge Cuts Child Rapist’s Sentence Because He Had Not Meant To Hurt The Toddler

Fact checked by The People's Voice Community
Judge Cuts Child Rapist’s Sentence Because He Had Not Meant To Hurt The Toddler

A California judge reduced a child rapist’s potential life sentence last week, saying the man had not meant to harm the three year old girl.

The Orange County Superior Court judge deviated from a mandated 25-year-to-life sentence for a man who sexually assaulted the toddler and sent him to prison for 10 years.

It was a rare legal move that Judge M. Marc Kelly employed Friday on Kevin Jonas Rojano, 20, who was convicted on Dec. 3 of sodomizing the child in his garage, according to the Orange County Register.

A petition has been set up calling on Judge Kelly to step down. If you want to read and sign, click HERE

Raw Story reports: Prosecutors said Rojano was playing video games June 4 in the garage of his Santa Ana home when a 3-year-old relative wandered in, and investigators said the man became sexually aroused by the child and assaulted her.

The girl’s mother was unable to get into the locked garage as she looked for the child, and prosecutors said Rojano covered the toddler’s mouth to keep her from yelling.

Rojano let the girl out of the garage, and her mother was unaware of the abuse until her daughter complained of pain.

“In looking at the facts of Mr. Rojano’s case, the manner in which this offense was committed is not typical of a predatory, violent brutal sodomy of a child case,” the judge claimed in his decision. “Mr. Rojano did not seek out or stalk (the victim). He was playing video games and she wandered into the garage. He inexplicably became sexually aroused but did not appear to consciously intend to harm (the victim) when he sexually assaulted her.”

Kelly also argued that Rojano, who had been abused as a child, said he regretted his crime.

“Although serious and despicable, this does not compare to a situation where a pedophilic child predator preys on an innocent child,” the judge argued. “There was no violence or callous disregard for (the victim’s) well-being.”

Prosecutors said they disagreed with the judge’s decision and may appeal the sentence.


Niamh Harris
About Niamh Harris 14879 Articles
I am an alternative health practitioner interested in helping others reach their maximum potential.