NY Times: John Durham To Indict Clinton Lawyer

Fact checked
John Durham to indict Clinton lawyer

Special Counsel John Durham “will ask a grand jury to indict” former DNC/Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman for lying to the FBI, according to a bombshell report by the New York Times.

The false statement charges relate to a September 19, 2016 meeting FBI lawyer James Baker had with Sussman, where Sussman lied to the FBI by falsely claiming that the Trump Organization was communicating with Alfa Bank.

Per the New York Times:

Mr. Baker, the former F.B.I. lawyer, is said to have told investigators that he recalled Mr. Sussmann saying that he was not meeting him on behalf of any client.

The Reactionary reports: This was contradicted by (1) Sussman’s testimony to Congress; and (2) Sussman’s own billing records. Sussman’s lawyers acknowledged “they expected him to be indicted.”

As to Sussman’s testimony, here is a portion where he discusses the Alfa Bank information was given to him by a client.

As we have discussed, the New Yorker first reported back in 2020 that Durham had impaneled a grand jury relating to the false Alfa Bank/Trump Organization story. There is the potential that former Feinstein staffer Daniel Jones – as well as the researches behind the Alfa Bank matter – will also face charges of giving false information to federal officials.

More recently, we noted that Fusion GPS has been fighting to keep secret its communications about Trump/Alfa Bank secret in a civil suit. Court records we reviewed appear to show the degree with which Fusion GPS, Glenn Simpson, and their associates went in drafting and promoting the false Alfa Bank/Trump Organization story.

One court document of interest is this August 26, 2016 e-mail from Fusion GPS to Michael Sussman.

That Fusion GPS-Sussman correspondence occurred not long before Sussman met with FBI General Counsel James Baker weeks later.

The e-mails correspond to the dates the Alfa Bank/Trump Organization was getting media exposure. One has to wonder what other correspondence Sussman had with Fusion GPS.

Questions have long been asked about Sussman’s involvement in the potential cover-up of the DNC hack in 2016. It was Sussman who brought in CrowdStrike (given his close relationship with founder Shawn Henry) to look into the DNC hack. According to Politico:

In late April [2016], the DNC’s IT department noticed some suspicious behavior and contacted DNC chief executive officer Amy Dacey, according to a DNC official. Dacey reached out to DNC lawyer Michael Sussmann, a partner at the Perkins Coie law firm and a former federal prosecutor specializing in cybercrimes. Sussmann called Shawn Henry, the president of cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, to get his company’s help. 

This CrowdStrike/Perkins Coie links put into perspective this information in the the New York Times article, where Durham

has been pursuing a theory that the Clinton campaign used Perkins Coie to submit dubious information to the F.B.I. about Russia and Mr. Trump in an effort to gin up investigative activity to hurt his 2016 campaign.

If that is the case, then we doubt it would be limited to the Alfa Bank allegations.

Future Developments

We’ll be following the Sussman story closely and will post the charging documents and criminal information once – or if – Durham gets the indictment.


  1. Why announce this stuff to NYT and others. Just indict him already. Gotta let the swamp know what’s going down so they can cover their asses. What a joke, but it ain’t funny !!!!

  2. As we all knew, no big fish indicted. Just a token move to make it look like Durham did something.
    Our once great nation is lost. I recommend taking all your money out of stock market and bank. Buy small silver coins for bartering and trade. Load up on dry goods, rice, beans, etc. Try to find a home near fresh water and buy water purifying equipment. And, of course, stock up on ammo.
    It is over folks, the antichrist (the first beast of revelation) is about to rise to power.

  3. We need to see an awful lot of crooked lawyers and crooked cops taken to Court and the return of we the people, the democratic majority of the people as the Moral. Authority for the rule of law A genuine democratic majority Not at best one seventh of the peoples team.eader as the Rule of law.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.