Barack Obama: “We Need Full-Blown Gov’t Censorship To Eradicate Independent Media”

Fact checked
Obama calls for full-blown government censorship to eradicate independent media from online spaces

Former President Barack Hussein Obama has urged the Biden regime to declare a national emergency and use its powers to eradicate all independent media online ahead of the 2024 election.

Speaking to CBS News on Tuesday, Obama warned that the mainstream media has lost its control over the narrative and said the only solution is for the U.S. government to step in and take drastic action.

“The thing that I’m most worried about is the degree to which we now have a divided conversation, in part because we have a divided media, right?” Obama told Nate Burleson.

“I’m much older than you… when I was coming up, you had three TV stations and people were getting a similar sense of what is true and what isn’t, what was real and what was not.”

“Today, what I’m most concerned about is because of the splintering of the media, we almost occupy different realities,” Obama said, adding “If something happens, in the past, everybody could say, all right, we may disagree on how to solve it, but at least we all agree that, yeah, that’s an issue.”

Infowars.com reports: Obama further complained that in this day and age some people refuse to believe media narratives.

“Now people will say, well, that didn’t happen, or I don’t believe that,” he complained, asserting that “one of, I think, the goals of the Obama Foundation, and one of the goals of my post-presidency, is how do we return to that common conversation? How can we have a common set of facts?”

Obama went on to talk about gun control as an example of one issue he wants to see Americans accept a “common set of facts” on.

“We may disagree on gun violence in terms of what the best prescriptions are, but we can’t deny the data that says the United States has levels of gun violence that are 5, 10, 15 times more than other countries,” he stated, adding “So if we say it is just a mental health problem, well, it’s not like there aren’t people with mental health problems in those other countries. What’s the difference? This is probably the difference. Now, we can have a debate. But at least we’ve agreed on some facts.”

Watch:

Is Obama concerned that the ‘reality’ we occupy is no longer forged by what the establishment media and their NFL players/comedians/entertainers turned ‘reporters’ are bought to push as the case by their corporate sponsors?

As the interview went on, Obama cited Australia as a model of gun control, noting that in that country there was “one mass shooting 50 years ago and they said, we’re not doing that anymore,” before outlawing all firearms.

“That is normally how you would expect a society to respond when your children are at risk,” Obama declared.

Many viewers refused to accept that ‘common set of facts’:

17 Comments

  1. This anti-American Marxist needs to be scrubbed from history. We need to regain the upper hand and push hard for our way of life; not theirs!

    • If We Don’t, We and Our Family Members Can Expect To Be A Victim Of ‘their’ Depopulation agenda Any time ‘they’ wish…

  2. I’m older than Barry the fraudster and my Elders had us listen to radio, including short-wave radio – Know it is out there but your IQ has to be adequate to learn Morse Code and such, back then but we had to learn to ‘do math, read & write’ as well… That generation knew the ‘mainstream’ was lying about ‘the iron-curtain’, Vietnam, Cuba, the Gold Standard, etc. and taught us what crooks were ‘in the house’ – Barry is a phony puppet dictator – godless, lawless and clueless – We the People and smarter than that!

  3. Just reverse his audio “yes we can” and you hear thank you satan. If you don’t believe it use an app and theeaning is simple evryone can say things in reverse you can test it, yourself but the high up people have all satanic agenda in reverse. They lie forward but backmasking revealed evrything. Don’t trust demonic “people “.

  4. He’s a despicable disgusting dishonest devious deceitful snake hissing in the grass IMO .THEY are a den of vipers IMO .Just as the unbelievable case if Martin Bryant is still as dubious az 9/11 imo ,but if course you can’t say that since only independent media would question the MSM narrative .And just as the complete absurdity of having 1 psychiatric patient ,let loose by his doctors ,to gun down all those kids being then blamed on every responsible gun owner requiring them to compliantly surrender their weapons, is a complete TRAVESTY of common sense ,so too was Obama’s cold blooded killing of the unarmed defensekess mother of the baby that he had shot to death and then had the media all silenced from investigating or reporting the truth about that too .

  5. I absolutely despise this phucking n i _ _ e r. He should be swinging from the gallows.

  6. Obama when born in 1961 was a British Subject via his British Subject father, per the British Nationality Act of 1948 which governed the status of children born to British Subjects. Obama thus was born with dual citizenship and allegiances and a foreign claim on his allegiance. Obama is not a natural born citizen of the USA and he is and was not eligible to be the President under Article II of Our U.S. Constitution. He is a Usurper.

    While a natural born Citizen is obviously a Citizen at birth, not all Citizens at birth are natural born Citizens at birth. The two legal terms of art are not identical and are not equal. All “natural born Citizens” are Citizens at birth but not all Citizens are “natural born Citizens” at birth. If you cannot grasp that logic concept then try this analogy, “all trees are plants but not all plants are trees”.

    There are five types of Citizenship mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. All Citizens have equal rights as a member of the society but not all Citizens have the privilege and legal eligibility requirements to be the President and Commander in Chief of the Military under Article II of our Constitution, the fundamental law of our nation.

    There is absolutely nothing in that U.S. Statute, USC Title 8 Section 1401 that addresses “natural born Citizenship”. The law addresses basic “Citizenship at Birth”, i.e., who is a “Citizen by Birth”, (which is needed under various situations and conditions of a child’s birth spelled out in Section 1401) which requires such a man-made act of law to grant the Citizenship by an act of Congress, i.e., naturalized at birth by act of Congress. USC 1401 does not grant “natural born Citizenship” to anyone. Natural born Citizens do not need man-made laws to grant them Citizenship. The facts of nature of their birth do that. The legal term of art “natural born Citizen” is not even mentioned in that law. USC Title 8 Section 1401 only determines by law who is a “Citizen” or a “National” of the U.S. at birth, i.e., a basic “Citizen at birth”, i.e., a person entitled to the rights and privileges of membership in the society of our nation under our Constitution, the supreme and fundamental law of our nation. The Section 1401 law is a naturalization law which grants citizenship by law, not by nature. The legal term of art “Citizen at birth” is not the same legally as the legal term of art “natural born Citizen”. Simply note that in one case we are talking about who is at least an ordinary, basic “Citizen” at birth with no adjectives in front of the word Citizen, and in the other case we have two very important adjectives placed in front of the word Citizen by the framers of the Constitution, i.e., “natural born” Citizen. Since that term was used in the Constitution only once in Article II for singular most powerful office in our new federal government, the framers intended that it have special meaning. And the source of that meaning is written down and well known by legal scholars. That specific type of citizenship and “legal term of art” natural born Citizen was codified by Vattel in his legal treatise “The Law of Nations and Principles of Natural Law”, published in 1758, in which he said that … a natural born citizen is a person born in the country to parents who are both citizens of the country. And this group or class of citizens are the most populous group of any nation. They do not need statutory law to be considered Citizens of the nation. Nature and the facts of their birth in the country to two Citizen parents granted that to them, not Congress.

    Most citizens of the USA are natural born citizens. Most citizens of the USA were born in the USA to two parents who were citizens of the USA. And that is the pool of citizens that must be chosen from for the singular most powerful office in Our nation, the President and Commander-in-Chief of Our military. Simple citizenship at birth by being born in the USA without regard to the citizenship status of both your parents … or by naturalization and swearing an Oath to this country and renouncing all allegiances foreign kings, princes, and potentates later as an adult, is adequate for the offices of Senator, Representative, or a Governor of a state. But it is not sufficient to be the President under Article II, to Constitutional Standards. Article II requires that the person to be eligible to be President Must be a “natural born Citizen”. And that means that person Must be born in the USA … AND … both his parents must be citizens of the USA.

    ALSO: Obama’s Lawyers Officially Admit Birth Certificate is Fake

    occupy

    corporatism

    dot

    com

  7. I cannot find the “quotes” at the top of the page in the article. I guess Obama didn’t say the government should use emergency powers (like what? Martial law?) to take over independent media after all.

    Clickbait.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.