The World Athletics international governing body has announced that it will not allow biological males to compete against biological women.
Lord Sebastian Coe, president of the body declared that as of March 31 no athlete who has gone through male puberty will be permitted to compete in female world ranking competitions.
BYPASS THE CENSORS
Sign up to get unfiltered news delivered straight to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
Summit.news reports: Coe noted that further research will be undertaken on the matter, saying “We’re not saying no forever,” adding that the decision for now has been “guided by the overarching principle which is to protect the female category.”
“The majority of those consulted stated that transgender athletes should not be competing in the female category,” Coe noted, adding “Many believe there is insufficient evidence that trans women do not retain advantage over biological women, and want more evidence that any physical advantages have been ameliorated before they are willing to consider an option for inclusion into the female category.”
Coe added that sports bodies must “try to strike a balance between inclusivity and making sure there is no unfair advantage,” labelling the issue as “thorny”.
The decision was taken after World Athletics consulted 40 member federations, athletes and coaches, UN experts, the IOC and Para Athletics. It is also reported that pro-trans groups were consulted.
The governing body also voted to reduce the testosterone threshold for athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD) to below 2.5 nanomoles per litre, down from 5, for all events in the female category.
Reacting to the announcement, Olympic swimming medalist Sharron Davies called it a victory for “fair sport.”
Davies has long campaigned for the protection of women’s rights in sports, which she says has prompted trans groups to make her life hell.
Last year, Swimming’s world governing body slapped a total ban on transgender athletes that have gone through any form of male puberty from taking part in women’s competitions.
The decision was made following controversy over transgender swimmer Lia Thomas, with doctors advising that the competitor still had an unfair advantage over biological females despite having undergone testosterone suppressing therapy.
Following the example of world swimming, Rugby’s international governing body also banned transgender athletes from competing in women’s matches.
Perhaps more sporting bodies will now take a look at what is happening within their competitions and follow these examples of restoring the rights of women to compete fairly.
Sean Adl-Tabatabai
Latest posts by Sean Adl-Tabatabai (see all)
- UK Gov’t Warns of Explosion in ‘Turbo Cancers’ Following Jab Rollout - December 2, 2023
- Children With Liberal Parents More Likely To Become Mentally Ill, Study Warns - December 2, 2023
- New Zealand Gov’t: ‘COVID Jabs Killed Over 20% of the Population’ - December 2, 2023
How on earth was this allowed to get started in the first place. follow the money all the way to the Rothschilds.
You really have problems dealing with reality don’t you.
you must be a rothschild
Typical. Filthy toad now just aiding the new world orders sanctuary cities get their hands on pre buscents. And I can see the mummies with sponsorship dollar signs in their eyes pushing their little kids down the path. And I’d the parents don’t know then whose paying the bills or is it all free for the little children
make some more groups for Whatever at whatever age or weight OR whatever.Putting people in the wrong groupings is like a 80 years old running at a college or a kiddy care kid playing profootball.